06.03.2013 Views

Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing: Behavioral ... - Arteimi.info

Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing: Behavioral ... - Arteimi.info

Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing: Behavioral ... - Arteimi.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

larger mental imageries than smaller ones [18]. The results, though argued by<br />

the contemporary psychologists, however, follow directly from intuition.<br />

Moyer’s view: Robert Moyer provided additional <strong>info</strong>rmation on the<br />

correspondence between the relative size of the objects <strong>and</strong> the relative size of<br />

their mental imagery. Moyer’s results were based on psychophysics, the<br />

branch of psychology engaged in measuring peoples’ reactions to perceptual<br />

stimuli [24]. In psychophysics, people take a longer time to determine which of<br />

the two almost equal straight lines is larger. Moyer thus stated that the<br />

reaction time to identify a larger mental image between two closely equal<br />

images is quite large.<br />

Peterson’s view: Unlike visual imagery, Intons-Peterson [28] experimented<br />

with auditory signals (also called images). She asked her students to first<br />

create a mental imagery of a cat’s purring <strong>and</strong> then the ringing tone of a<br />

telephone set. She then advised her students to move the pitch of the first<br />

mental imagery up <strong>and</strong> compare it with the second imagery. After many hours<br />

of experimentation, she arrived at the conclusion that people require quite a<br />

large time to compare two mental imageries, when they are significantly<br />

different. But they require less time to traverse the mental imagery when they<br />

are very close. For instance, the imagery of purring, being close enough to the<br />

ticking of a clock, requires less time to compare them.<br />

2.4.4 Imagery <strong>and</strong> Their Shape<br />

How can people compare two similar shaped imageries? Obviously the<br />

reasoning process looks at the boundaries <strong>and</strong> compares the closeness of the<br />

two imageries. It is evident from commonsense reasoning that two imageries of<br />

an almost similar boundary require a longer time to determine whether they are<br />

identical. Two dissimilar shaped imageries, however, require a little reaction<br />

time to arrive at a decision about their non-uniqueness.<br />

Paivio [26] made a pioneering contribution in this regard. He established the<br />

principle, stated above, by experiments with mental clock imagery. When the<br />

angle between the two arm positions in a clock is comparable with the same in<br />

another imagery, obviously the reaction time becomes large to determine which<br />

angle is larger. The credit to Paivio lies in extending the principle in a generic<br />

sense.<br />

2.4.5 Part-whole Relationship in Mental Imagery<br />

Reed was interested in studying whether people could determine a part-whole<br />

relationship of their mental image [20]. For instance, suppose one has saved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!