06.03.2013 Views

Volume 2 - LENR-CANR

Volume 2 - LENR-CANR

Volume 2 - LENR-CANR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The expression (45) was partially evaluated in a previous paper [7]; in fact, we were only<br />

interested in the dependence of the tunneling probability on impurities present within the<br />

lattice. Through the present work, we seek to examine the correlation between potential<br />

features and loading ratio. Some numerical results are showed in the paragraph 5.<br />

ii) β-phase<br />

Phase happens when x is higher than 0.1 but lower than 0.7. The interaction takes place<br />

among deuteron ions that oscillate between the following energy values:<br />

0.1 eV < ħ < 0.2 eV<br />

In this case W(t) is zero, we can express the potential as follows:<br />

2<br />

q J<br />

R <br />

V ( r)<br />

k <br />

V r <br />

<br />

M ( )<br />

(46)<br />

r r <br />

Comparing the expressions 45 and 46, it seems clear that the weight of impurities is more<br />

important in the -phase. Of course this conclusion relates to previous papers [7,8] in which we<br />

have studied the role of temperature on tunneling effect.<br />

iii) γ-phase<br />

Lastly, the deuteron-palladium system is in the phase when the loading ratio is higher than<br />

0.7.<br />

This is the most interesting case. The deuterons cross the screening through the d-electrons<br />

shell. In this respect, we did a numeric simulation where we supposed that the D-D potential<br />

must be computed on the assumption that the potential (37) well disappears because of the<br />

Morse contribution. In fact, if we use a classical plasma model where the D + ions are the<br />

positive charge and the d-electrons the negative one, it is very “realistic” to obtain the<br />

following potential:<br />

2<br />

q J<br />

R <br />

V ( r,<br />

t)<br />

k VM<br />

r<br />

Qt<br />

r <br />

( ) <br />

r <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

where Q(t) is an unknown perturbative potential. On this topic, we can also add that:<br />

Wmax<br />

Q( t)<br />

(48)<br />

t<br />

2<br />

In the next evaluation it is given as:<br />

Q( t)<br />

85eV<br />

(49)<br />

t<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

The aim of this section is to present the D-D fusion probability normalized to number of<br />

events per second regarding the D-D interaction in all different phases. More exactly, we seek<br />

to compare fusion probability in phases , and according to the variation of energy between<br />

568<br />

(47)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!