The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux
The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux
The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 0-6 Meshed <strong>Grid</strong> Design for 2030, Reference Scenario<br />
Based on the NSCOGI 2011 forecasts of generation and demand in the Reference scenario,<br />
the analysis carried out for this study showed that there may be slight a preference for<br />
adopting a meshed approach to grid design by 2030.<br />
<strong>The</strong> radial and meshed designs generate an annual saving in overall production costs<br />
across the NSCOGI region of 1,449 M€ at annual costs of 1,488 M€ for the radial design,<br />
and of 1,456M€ at annual costs of 1,418 M€ for the meshed design. Thus, the meshed<br />
design provides economically the slightly better solution for the region on the basis of the<br />
assumptions made. However, the significance of these differences has to be tested with<br />
further analysis and other generation mix scenarios.<br />
In addition, there are other less quantifiable implications of both approaches including<br />
challenges and possible advantages of a meshed grid:<br />
Challenges: the added complexity associated with designing and building a<br />
meshed grid, increased technology and operational risk and the need for<br />
regulatory clarification, which has already been started within NSCOGI WG2 .<br />
Possible advantages: the increased operational flexibility provided by the meshed<br />
network with greater resilience for individual <strong>Offshore</strong> wind power plant (OWPP). In<br />
addition, reduced environmental impact should be expected with the potential for<br />
larger cables and fewer landing points.<br />
Page 1-7