The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux
The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux
The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> costs and the benefits for the radial and mesh network designs are summarised in the<br />
Table 5-3 below. <strong>The</strong> differences are presented with reference to the radial case.<br />
<strong>The</strong> capital costs account for the majority of the total costs with the meshed capital costs<br />
being 5% lower than the radial capital costs. <strong>The</strong> variable operating and maintenance costs<br />
(VOM) show a similar result with Meshed VOM costs being 4% lower than the Radial VOM<br />
costs. Together, the total costs differ by 5%.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Production cost savings for both the Radial and Meshed scenarios are almost the<br />
same, differing by just under 0.5%. Consequently, the analysis of the costs and the<br />
benefits of the proposed network designs will be dictated by the differences in the total<br />
costs of the two network designs and not by the differences in the production cost<br />
savings.<br />
Table 5-3 Summary of Costs (excluding OWP connection costs) and Benefits for Radial and Meshed Designs<br />
A B<br />
Annualised<br />
Investment<br />
Cost excluding<br />
the radial<br />
OWPP<br />
connection<br />
costs<br />
Annual<br />
VOM<br />
Costs<br />
C<br />
= A+B<br />
Total Costs<br />
D<br />
Production<br />
Cost Savings<br />
E<br />
= D-C<br />
Net benefits<br />
F<br />
= E/C<br />
Net benefit<br />
related to<br />
total costs<br />
M€ p.a. M€ p.a. M€ p.a. M€ p.a. M€ p.a. [%]<br />
Radial 1,152 336 1,488 1,449 -39<br />
-2,6<br />
Meshed 1,096 322 1,418 1,456 38<br />
Difference<br />
Radial vs<br />
Meshed<br />
-56 -14 -70 7 77<br />
Based on the scenario considered and the assumptions made, the meshed network design<br />
has an annual net benefit of 38 M€ compared to the radial network design that has an<br />
annual net loss of 39 M€, representing 77 M€ per annum difference between them. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
net benefit or net loss values individually represent approximately 2.6% of the total costs<br />
and as such may not necessarily be seen as significant enough to distinguish the results<br />
from a net break-even result for either design.<br />
<strong>The</strong> difference between the two alternatives is relatively small and on a purely comparative<br />
basis - using the assumptions, data, methodologies and tools available - the meshed<br />
network design would be ranked ahead of the radial network design.<br />
+2,7<br />
Page 51 of 142