26.03.2013 Views

The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux

The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux

The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> costs and the benefits for the radial and mesh network designs are summarised in the<br />

Table 5-3 below. <strong>The</strong> differences are presented with reference to the radial case.<br />

<strong>The</strong> capital costs account for the majority of the total costs with the meshed capital costs<br />

being 5% lower than the radial capital costs. <strong>The</strong> variable operating and maintenance costs<br />

(VOM) show a similar result with Meshed VOM costs being 4% lower than the Radial VOM<br />

costs. Together, the total costs differ by 5%.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Production cost savings for both the Radial and Meshed scenarios are almost the<br />

same, differing by just under 0.5%. Consequently, the analysis of the costs and the<br />

benefits of the proposed network designs will be dictated by the differences in the total<br />

costs of the two network designs and not by the differences in the production cost<br />

savings.<br />

Table 5-3 Summary of Costs (excluding OWP connection costs) and Benefits for Radial and Meshed Designs<br />

A B<br />

Annualised<br />

Investment<br />

Cost excluding<br />

the radial<br />

OWPP<br />

connection<br />

costs<br />

Annual<br />

VOM<br />

Costs<br />

C<br />

= A+B<br />

Total Costs<br />

D<br />

Production<br />

Cost Savings<br />

E<br />

= D-C<br />

Net benefits<br />

F<br />

= E/C<br />

Net benefit<br />

related to<br />

total costs<br />

M€ p.a. M€ p.a. M€ p.a. M€ p.a. M€ p.a. [%]<br />

Radial 1,152 336 1,488 1,449 -39<br />

-2,6<br />

Meshed 1,096 322 1,418 1,456 38<br />

Difference<br />

Radial vs<br />

Meshed<br />

-56 -14 -70 7 77<br />

Based on the scenario considered and the assumptions made, the meshed network design<br />

has an annual net benefit of 38 M€ compared to the radial network design that has an<br />

annual net loss of 39 M€, representing 77 M€ per annum difference between them. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

net benefit or net loss values individually represent approximately 2.6% of the total costs<br />

and as such may not necessarily be seen as significant enough to distinguish the results<br />

from a net break-even result for either design.<br />

<strong>The</strong> difference between the two alternatives is relatively small and on a purely comparative<br />

basis - using the assumptions, data, methodologies and tools available - the meshed<br />

network design would be ranked ahead of the radial network design.<br />

+2,7<br />

Page 51 of 142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!