The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux
The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux
The North Seas Countries' Offshore Grid Initiative - Initial ... - Benelux
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CAPEX [€'m]<br />
14,000<br />
12,000<br />
10,000<br />
8,000<br />
6,000<br />
4,000<br />
2,000<br />
-<br />
BE DE DK FR GB IE LU NL NO SE<br />
Terminal HVDC 362 2,096 623 637 3,440 271 - 1,835 272 259<br />
Station AC 58 - 10 - 630 20 13 - - -<br />
Line HVDC OFFshore 245 535 220 875 3,227 682 - 1,112 579 93<br />
Line AC OFFshore 244 - - 1,915 2,764 335 - 532 - -<br />
Line HVDC Onshore - - - 1,486 - - - - - -<br />
Line AC ONshore 343 176 751 1,461 1,736 99 - 620 276 20<br />
Figure 5-6 Radial <strong>Grid</strong> New Circuit Investment Costs for 2030 Reference Scenario (additional to TYNDP<br />
projects)<br />
<strong>The</strong> total of the investment costs of the optimised 2030 meshed grid design is 30 €bn.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se costs are displayed by country and asset type in Figure 5-7. In this case the Great<br />
Britain share of the costs is reduced to about 33%, while the German and French<br />
investment costs have increased. <strong>The</strong> changes in total cost for each country are displayed<br />
in Figure 5-8. While the positions of individual countries change between the two designs,<br />
the important point to note is that the overall costs are somewhat lower for the meshed<br />
case indicating a potential benefit to the region of such meshed design. However, the<br />
difference in overall costs is relatively small compared to the overall capital costs<br />
reflecting the limited amount of meshing proposed in the meshed case for this Reference<br />
Scenario.<br />
Page 40 of 142