You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
[ i» ]<br />
But the Generals great importunity again perfwaded him,<br />
to accompany him in a long March, into the Nipmiick Country,<br />
141 tho' he had then Tents in his Wounds, and fo Lame<br />
as not able to Mount his Horfe without two Mens affiftance.<br />
In this March the firft thing remarkable was, they came<br />
to an Indian Town, 142 where there were many Wigwams<br />
p<strong>of</strong>e that Church here refers to an expe-<br />
dition into the Nipmuck country in<br />
March, 1676, which no other chronicler<br />
had noticed. As Church dictated his<br />
narrative, the chronology was correct.<br />
<strong>The</strong> fight was on the 19th <strong>of</strong> December.<br />
It was probably feveral days after that<br />
date before Church, with the wounded,<br />
was got over to Rhode-Illand. <strong>The</strong><br />
Conn, forces foon went home to recruit,<br />
but the Mafs. and Plym. troops remained<br />
in garrifon at Wickford, and<br />
were re-enforced from B<strong>of</strong>ton, Jan. 10.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Conn, forces (fee Maj. Palmes's<br />
letter, Conn. Col. Rec. ii : 402) appear<br />
to have reached Wickford again, 27<br />
Jan., when the whole army feems to<br />
have ftarted for the Nipmuck country<br />
(whither the enemy were underftood to<br />
have fled), 1600 ftrong. This corref-<br />
ponds, very accurately, with the<br />
month's interval <strong>of</strong> which Church<br />
fpeaks, if he accompanied Gov. Winflow<br />
on this firft march, in force, from<br />
Wickford. Hubbard's account implies<br />
that our men ftarted from Wickford, 27<br />
Jan. [Hubbard's Narrative, 58, 60;<br />
Arnold's Hijl. R.-I. i : 406 ; Drake's<br />
Church., 65.]<br />
141 Nipmuck \_Nip>iet~] was a name<br />
given to the petty tribes, or clans, <strong>of</strong><br />
inland Indians fcattered over a large<br />
61<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> country, in Windham and<br />
Tolland Counties in Connecticut, Wor-<br />
cefter and Hampden Counties in Mafia-<br />
chufetts, and the northern part <strong>of</strong><br />
Rhode-Ifland ; but their principal feat<br />
was at, or near, the great ponds in<br />
Oxford (Webfter), Mafs. From thefe<br />
ponds they probably derived their name<br />
<strong>of</strong> "Pond" or " Frelh-water " (jiippe,<br />
nip) Indians. If the two names, or<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> the name, are not identical<br />
in origin, Nipnct belongs to the territory,<br />
i.e. "at the frelb-water pond";<br />
Nipmuck, to the tribe, (iiip-amaug)<br />
"they fiih in frelh water"; but p<strong>of</strong>fibly<br />
" a frelh water filhing-place." This<br />
diftinguilhed them from the Shore In-<br />
dians, and the River Indians <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Connecticut Valley ; their neighbors on<br />
the weft. Snipjic (corrupted from<br />
MiJJicnipf-ci) Pond, in Ellington, Conn.,<br />
was the bound where the country <strong>of</strong><br />
the Nipmucks joined that <strong>of</strong> the River<br />
Indians on the weft, and the Mohcgan<br />
north-weft angle.<br />
142 Supp<strong>of</strong>ed to be Pumham's town<br />
(fee note 127, ante) in a rocky fwamp<br />
in <strong>War</strong>wick, R.-I., — <strong>War</strong>wick then embracing<br />
m<strong>of</strong>t <strong>of</strong> what is now <strong>War</strong>wick<br />
and Coventry. <strong>The</strong> diftance is ftated<br />
as 20 miles from Smith's. [Baylies'<br />
Mem. Plym. Col. iii : 104.]