27.03.2013 Views

The history of King Philip's War

The history of King Philip's War

The history of King Philip's War

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[ i» ]<br />

But the Generals great importunity again perfwaded him,<br />

to accompany him in a long March, into the Nipmiick Country,<br />

141 tho' he had then Tents in his Wounds, and fo Lame<br />

as not able to Mount his Horfe without two Mens affiftance.<br />

In this March the firft thing remarkable was, they came<br />

to an Indian Town, 142 where there were many Wigwams<br />

p<strong>of</strong>e that Church here refers to an expe-<br />

dition into the Nipmuck country in<br />

March, 1676, which no other chronicler<br />

had noticed. As Church dictated his<br />

narrative, the chronology was correct.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fight was on the 19th <strong>of</strong> December.<br />

It was probably feveral days after that<br />

date before Church, with the wounded,<br />

was got over to Rhode-Illand. <strong>The</strong><br />

Conn, forces foon went home to recruit,<br />

but the Mafs. and Plym. troops remained<br />

in garrifon at Wickford, and<br />

were re-enforced from B<strong>of</strong>ton, Jan. 10.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Conn, forces (fee Maj. Palmes's<br />

letter, Conn. Col. Rec. ii : 402) appear<br />

to have reached Wickford again, 27<br />

Jan., when the whole army feems to<br />

have ftarted for the Nipmuck country<br />

(whither the enemy were underftood to<br />

have fled), 1600 ftrong. This corref-<br />

ponds, very accurately, with the<br />

month's interval <strong>of</strong> which Church<br />

fpeaks, if he accompanied Gov. Winflow<br />

on this firft march, in force, from<br />

Wickford. Hubbard's account implies<br />

that our men ftarted from Wickford, 27<br />

Jan. [Hubbard's Narrative, 58, 60;<br />

Arnold's Hijl. R.-I. i : 406 ; Drake's<br />

Church., 65.]<br />

141 Nipmuck \_Nip>iet~] was a name<br />

given to the petty tribes, or clans, <strong>of</strong><br />

inland Indians fcattered over a large<br />

61<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> country, in Windham and<br />

Tolland Counties in Connecticut, Wor-<br />

cefter and Hampden Counties in Mafia-<br />

chufetts, and the northern part <strong>of</strong><br />

Rhode-Ifland ; but their principal feat<br />

was at, or near, the great ponds in<br />

Oxford (Webfter), Mafs. From thefe<br />

ponds they probably derived their name<br />

<strong>of</strong> "Pond" or " Frelh-water " (jiippe,<br />

nip) Indians. If the two names, or<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> the name, are not identical<br />

in origin, Nipnct belongs to the territory,<br />

i.e. "at the frelb-water pond";<br />

Nipmuck, to the tribe, (iiip-amaug)<br />

"they fiih in frelh water"; but p<strong>of</strong>fibly<br />

" a frelh water filhing-place." This<br />

diftinguilhed them from the Shore In-<br />

dians, and the River Indians <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Connecticut Valley ; their neighbors on<br />

the weft. Snipjic (corrupted from<br />

MiJJicnipf-ci) Pond, in Ellington, Conn.,<br />

was the bound where the country <strong>of</strong><br />

the Nipmucks joined that <strong>of</strong> the River<br />

Indians on the weft, and the Mohcgan<br />

north-weft angle.<br />

142 Supp<strong>of</strong>ed to be Pumham's town<br />

(fee note 127, ante) in a rocky fwamp<br />

in <strong>War</strong>wick, R.-I., — <strong>War</strong>wick then embracing<br />

m<strong>of</strong>t <strong>of</strong> what is now <strong>War</strong>wick<br />

and Coventry. <strong>The</strong> diftance is ftated<br />

as 20 miles from Smith's. [Baylies'<br />

Mem. Plym. Col. iii : 104.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!