28.03.2013 Views

Summary of Rubber Modified Asphalt Product Specifications around ...

Summary of Rubber Modified Asphalt Product Specifications around ...

Summary of Rubber Modified Asphalt Product Specifications around ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2 Material Property Testing <strong>of</strong> Terminal Blends<br />

For Ontario, the specification requires terminal blend asphalt cement to meet the Type III asphalt<br />

rubber binder according to ASTM D6114 as well as PGAC grade specified.<br />

In California, terminal blend asphalt cement shown in Table 3 is comparable with polymer<br />

modified asphalts. It basically requires the Superpave performance grade specified with some<br />

modifications highlighted in Table 3. Compared with conventional asphalt cements, the<br />

solubility requirement is reduced from 99% to 97.5% for terminal blends with an increase in the<br />

requirement on phase angle at the high temperature and percent recovery from elastic recovery<br />

testing results.<br />

Since terminal blends are similar to polymer modified asphalt, they can be used in any hot mix or<br />

surface treatment application where polymer modified asphalts are used.<br />

5.0 <strong>Asphalt</strong> <strong>Rubber</strong> Field Blend Mix <strong>Specifications</strong><br />

<strong>Asphalt</strong> rubber field blends have high viscosity and are more effective when used with gap-<br />

graded or open- graded mixes. In 2011, Ontario built several pilot projects using the asphalt<br />

rubber with gap- graded hot mix asphalt (Tabib et. al. 2012). The following sections present a<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> specifications for using asphalt rubber field blend with gap - or open – graded<br />

mixes from various agencies.<br />

5.1 <strong>Rubber</strong>ized Hot Mix <strong>Asphalt</strong> Gap-Graded<br />

<strong>Rubber</strong> <strong>Modified</strong> <strong>Asphalt</strong> gap-graded mixes consist <strong>of</strong> mixing gap-graded aggregate and field<br />

blended rubberized asphalt cement and then spreading and compacting the mix to satisfy an<br />

agency’s specification. Most agencies have a similar requirement in their specifications. The<br />

following shows some differences among agencies.<br />

5.1.1 Mix Design Aspect<br />

Not all agencies surveyed used gap-graded asphalt rubber mix. As shown in Table 4, the binder<br />

content <strong>of</strong> Ontario mix design is on the lower side <strong>of</strong> that used by other agencies. For California,<br />

the asphalt cement content should not be less than 7% or higher than 9%. In California, the<br />

Contractor provides the Engineer a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

constituent components <strong>of</strong> the asphalt-rubber binder, for the completed mixture <strong>of</strong> asphaltrubber<br />

binder and for the Type G rubberized asphalt concrete. This should be done in Ontario as<br />

well to make sure there are no deleterious particles in the asphalt cement. The warm mix<br />

technologies may be able to help Ontario with cold temperature paving.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!