02.04.2013 Views

Managing Conservation Easements in Perpetuity - Environmental ...

Managing Conservation Easements in Perpetuity - Environmental ...

Managing Conservation Easements in Perpetuity - Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

All land trusts should review their<br />

state’s conservation easement<br />

enabl<strong>in</strong>g statute to <strong>in</strong>form the<br />

contents of their easement amendment<br />

policies and procedures.<br />

166<br />

another piece of unprotected land (such amendments are discussed<br />

further <strong>in</strong> this chapter and are considered by some experts as extremely<br />

risky). Your land trust should determ<strong>in</strong>e if your state attorney general<br />

has issued an op<strong>in</strong>ion on this issue, or if it has been addressed by a<br />

state court.<br />

Where governmental approval is required, even if the statute does not<br />

expressly limit the government’s discretion to act, the governmental<br />

entity must still abide by certa<strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples. If the oversee<strong>in</strong>g agency<br />

is a municipality, some state laws permit aggrieved taxpayers to challenge<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> acts. In addition, under the “doctr<strong>in</strong>e of public trust,”<br />

the misuse of important public resources by government officials is<br />

subject to legal challenge by the public. In most states, the public trust<br />

doctr<strong>in</strong>e allows the general public to file a lawsuit to stop a government<br />

action that would destroy or dim<strong>in</strong>ish a public resource, such as<br />

parkland. Public officials charged with easement oversight and land<br />

trust officials should justify their amendment decisions <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

demonstrate that the public <strong>in</strong>terest will not be harmed.Typically, land<br />

trusts document their amendment decision by recitations <strong>in</strong> the actual<br />

amendment. These recitations can take the form of an <strong>in</strong>troductory<br />

background statement, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the context of the amendment, the<br />

essential facts and circumstances, any approval the land trust obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

and so forth.The object of the background statement is to show transparency<br />

of the process, adherence to land trust policy and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

and cont<strong>in</strong>ued permanence of the public benefit of the conservation<br />

easement.The board resolution approv<strong>in</strong>g the amendment should also<br />

document these same po<strong>in</strong>ts.The basel<strong>in</strong>e documentation supplement<br />

likewise would also document the preservation of the purposes of the<br />

conservation easement and cont<strong>in</strong>ued public benefit, as well as adherence<br />

to the orig<strong>in</strong>al grantor’s <strong>in</strong>tentions to the extent known.<br />

State easement enabl<strong>in</strong>g statutes typically have significant variation.<br />

The Uniform <strong>Conservation</strong> Easement Act (UCEA) seeks to reduce<br />

that variation.The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform<br />

State Laws studies state laws to determ<strong>in</strong>e which areas of law should<br />

be uniform and promotes the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of uniformity by draft<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and propos<strong>in</strong>g specific statutes <strong>in</strong> areas of the law <strong>in</strong> which uniformity<br />

is desirable, such as the UCEA. The commissioners can only<br />

propose changes — no uniform law is effective until a state legislature<br />

adopts it. The commissioners approved the orig<strong>in</strong>al UCEA <strong>in</strong> 1981,<br />

and the UCEA has been adopted, <strong>in</strong> some form as of the review on<br />

January 1, 2009, by 27 states, the District of Columbia and the Virg<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Manag<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Easements</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Perpetuity</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!