27.04.2013 Views

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L I I 1 I<br />

reductions <strong>from</strong> uncontrolled to RACT levels and the instal led capital<br />

costs and annualized costs <strong>of</strong> achieving RACT for the three polymers.<br />

The specific assumptions and breakdowns <strong>of</strong> capital and annual costs and<br />

recovery credits, where appropriate, are given for each model plant in<br />

the following sections. ,<br />

Three cost analyses were performed for each polymer. These analyses<br />

were made in order to reflect various control costs and emission<br />

reductions associated with applyi ng RACT at plants that have di f ferent<br />

existing 1 evels <strong>of</strong> control. The actual costs and emission reductions<br />

I<br />

will depend upon the actual exi sting control level, stream characteristics<br />

potential stream combination, and potential utilization <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

control devi ces.<br />

The first cost estimate is based on combining a1 1 continuous<br />

streams that were judged to be reasonable to contro'l and delivering the8<br />

combined stream to a single control device. Since the reduced cost <strong>of</strong> '<br />

piping will generally not <strong>of</strong>fset the increased cost <strong>of</strong> multiple control1<br />

equi pment units, the use <strong>of</strong> a single control device for a plant is<br />

usually the lower cost option open to a plant.<br />

The second cost estimate is based on combining a1 1 continuous<br />

I<br />

streams <strong>from</strong> one type <strong>of</strong> process section in a plant and delivering the '<br />

combined stream to a single control device. This analysis reflects,<br />

I<br />

I<br />

for example, a potential situation in which a plant may be control ling<br />

I<br />

all other emissions except those <strong>from</strong> product finishing and in order to<br />

control product finishing emissions a new control device is required.<br />

I<br />

The third cost estimate is, in a sense, a subset <strong>of</strong> the second<br />

cost estimate where a plant may be controlling, for example, product<br />

I<br />

I<br />

finishing emissions <strong>from</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the lines. This estimate reflects a<br />

'"orst case'' scenario in which a new control device is required to<br />

control the emissions <strong>from</strong> a single process section (e.g., product<br />

finishing) in a single process line.<br />

5.2.1 Polypropylene (PP)<br />

The first cost estimate was developed for 98 percent VOC destruction<br />

by both thermal incinerators and flare control <strong>of</strong> the combined continuous<br />

emission streams <strong>from</strong> the liquid-phase polypropylene process. The cost<br />

I<br />

analysis is based on a fluidized bed dryer with emissions <strong>of</strong> 0.6 kg<br />

1<br />

VOC/1000 kg <strong>of</strong> product. (Some other dryers are potentially larger<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!