27.04.2013 Views

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

has acknowledged after discussion with vendors. A1 so, Petro-tex<br />

increased the efficiency <strong>of</strong> control 1 ing emissions <strong>from</strong> its 0x0 Butadiene<br />

process <strong>from</strong> 70 percent to over 98 percent through relatively low cost<br />

(in comparison to total capital cost) modifications that improved<br />

mixing. Although the air oxidation process emission test data are <strong>of</strong><br />

value in assessing incineration capabilities in general, it is true I<br />

that they do involve other chemicals and processes, some <strong>of</strong> which,<br />

however, would be expected to be more, not less, difficult to control .)<br />

Since the May 1982 draft was published, final results became available<br />

for EPA emissions testinq at a polypropylene facility. The results <strong>of</strong><br />

this studv ~rosram showed VOC destruction efficiencies <strong>of</strong> mixtures <strong>of</strong><br />

1<br />

gaseous, 1 iquid, and sol id wastes greater than 99 .71'p$rcent' for '<br />

temperatures <strong>of</strong> 1,600°F and greater and 1.5 seconds residence time.<br />

Therefore, 98 percent should be readily attainable for 0.75 seconds<br />

I<br />

residence time since kinetic studies show that residence time is<br />

beyond 0.5 to 0.75 sec is not a determining factor <strong>of</strong> reduction efficiency<br />

I<br />

(see p. D36).<br />

In order to ensure that RACT is readily achievable at a reasonable<br />

cost, and to avoid giving a competitive disadvantage to a1 ready welli-<br />

control led facil ities (another concern <strong>of</strong> the TCC) , existing incinerators<br />

and flares will be considered to achieve RACT without the need for<br />

modification or replacement. Also, in order to prevent a potential<br />

safety hazard (<strong>from</strong> cornbusting high-oxygen content streams) and a -<br />

potentially unreasonable cost effectiveness, RACT for product finishing<br />

and product storage operations was changed <strong>from</strong> 98 percent to 0.35 kg<br />

VOC/Mg product <strong>from</strong> the extruder on in the manufacturing process<br />

(e .g ., pel1 etizing and product storage).<br />

Regarding CMA's comment that RACT is not consistent with the<br />

other VOC regulations under development: RACT is not more stringenk<br />

than the NSPS for PP liquid phase and HDPE liquid phase slurry. The<br />

only difference with the SOCrlI Distil 1 ation NSPS, besides the SOCMI<br />

Distil 1 ation NSPS's anticipation <strong>of</strong> the joint CMA/EPA flare testing<br />

results is the use <strong>of</strong> a total resource effectiveness (TRE) index. the<br />

SOCHI Air Oxidation CTG also employs a TRE index and exempted'streams<br />

a1 read-Y control 1 ed by a thermal incinerator. The Polymers and Resins<br />

CTG allows States to decide whether to require testing and subsequdnt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!