27.04.2013 Views

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Test Results - VOC destruction efficienc,~ was determined at<br />

two different temperatures. Table D-6 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> these<br />

test results. Efficiency was found to increase with temperature. At<br />

(800°C) 1475"F, the efficiency was well above 99 percent. These tests<br />

were, again, for residence times greater than 0.75 second. However,<br />

theoretical calculations show that even greater ef'f iciency would be<br />

achieved at 870°C (1600°F) and 0.75 second than at the longer residence<br />

times but lower temperatures represented in these tests.<br />

A1 1 actual measurements were made as parts<br />

propane with the other units reported derived fr<br />

values. The values were measured by digital integration.<br />

The incinerator combustion temperature for the first six runs was<br />

about 630°C (1160°F). Runs 7 through 9 were made at an incinerator<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> about 800°C (1475°F). Only during Run 3 was the acrolein<br />

process operating. The higher temperature caused most <strong>of</strong> the compounds<br />

heavier than propane to drop below the detection limit due to the wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> attenuations used, nearby obscuring peaks, and base1 ine noise<br />

variations. The detection 1 imit ranges <strong>from</strong> about 10 parts per bill i ~ n<br />

(ppb) to 10 ppm, generally increasing during the chromatogram, and<br />

I<br />

especially near 1 arge peaks. Several <strong>of</strong> the mi nor peaks were di ff icul t<br />

to measure. However, the compounds <strong>of</strong> interest, methane, ethane,<br />

ethylene, propane, propylene, acetal dehyde, acetone, acrol ein, and<br />

acrylic a&d, dominate the chromatograms.<br />

I<br />

detected Sn any sample.<br />

Only &tic"acid bas never<br />

I I<br />

The probable reason for negative destruction efficiencies for<br />

several light components is generation by pyr om other com~on~ents<br />

For instance, the primary pyrolysis products <strong>of</strong> acrolein are carbon<br />

monoxide and ethylene. Except for methane and, to a much lesser<br />

extent, ethane and propane, the fuel gas cannot contribute hydrocarbons<br />

- *<br />

to the outlet samples.<br />

I<br />

A sample taken <strong>from</strong> the inlet line knockout trap showed 6 mg/g <strong>of</strong><br />

acetaldehyde, 25 mg/g <strong>of</strong> butenes, and 100 mg/g <strong>of</strong> acetone when analyzed<br />

I<br />

by gas chromatography/flame ionization detection (GC/FID) .<br />

0.2.3 Chemical Company Air Oxidation Unit Test D i 3<br />

These data are <strong>from</strong> tests performed by chemical companies on<br />

incinerators at two air oxidation units: the Petro-Tex oxidative<br />

- B ><br />

I I<br />

I<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!