27.04.2013 Views

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

other dryers may have higher or lower emissions. The combi ned stream<br />

characteri sti cs were cal cul ated based on the indi vidual stream character-<br />

istics and compositions given in Table 2-6 and an assumed composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.7 percent isobutane in air (thus requiring no further dilution to<br />

reduce the lower heating value to below 25 percent <strong>of</strong> the lower explosive<br />

limit in order to prevent an explosion hazard). Because <strong>of</strong> the substantial<br />

VOC content <strong>of</strong> the combined waste gas stream, quench air is required to<br />

reduce the combustion temperature <strong>of</strong> the incinerator and no auxiliary<br />

natural gas is required for flaring,<br />

Table 5-10 summarizes the results <strong>of</strong> the cost analysis for the<br />

high-densi ty polyethylene model plant. Breakdowns <strong>of</strong> capital and operating<br />

costs are presented for both thermal incinerators and flare systems.<br />

The total installed capital cost estimated for RAC T is $557,400 for a<br />

thermal incinerator system and $54,500 for a flare system. The annualized<br />

RACT cost estimates are $166,000 for a thermal incinerator and $47,400<br />

for a flare system. As was done for the polypropy lene model plant,<br />

two additional cost analyses were undertaken, The results <strong>of</strong> these two<br />

analyses are summarized in Table 5-11.<br />

5.2.3 Polystyrene (PS)<br />

Costs <strong>of</strong> ach ievi ng RACT for polystyrene continuous processes were<br />

estimated based on further condensation <strong>of</strong> JOC emitted <strong>from</strong> the two<br />

vents <strong>from</strong> the system recovering unreacted styrene monomer: the styrene<br />

condenser vent and the styrene recovery unit condenser vent. The extruder<br />

quench vent, the other stream within the scope <strong>of</strong> this CTG, contains<br />

only a trace <strong>of</strong> styrene in steam and was not considered for control<br />

under RACT. The styrene emissions <strong>from</strong> the two streams were combined<br />

and cooled to reduce gaseous emissions to 0.12 kg VOC/1000 kg <strong>of</strong> product.<br />

Current industry control is in a transitional period in which vacuum<br />

pumps are replacing steam eductors to produce the required vacuum. This<br />

transition is taking place because <strong>of</strong> cost incentives to recover styrene<br />

as vacuum pumps' result in lower emissions <strong>of</strong> styrene to the atmosphere.<br />

Both an "uncontrolled" emission level <strong>of</strong> 3.09 kg VOC/1000 kg <strong>of</strong> product<br />

and an already relatively well-control led emission level <strong>of</strong> 0.20 kg<br />

VOC/1000 kg <strong>of</strong> product were examined in the cost basis, The higher level<br />

is based on one plant that is already in the process <strong>of</strong> reducing emissions to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!