Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing
Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing
Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Canpany and Lo~catio~n<br />
Arco Polymers<br />
Deer Park, TX<br />
Table D-3. SUMRY OF THERMAL INCINERATOR EMISSION TEST RESULTS<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Prodluct<br />
Polypropylene<br />
Waste Incinerated<br />
Waste as^<br />
Waste as^<br />
Atactic wastea<br />
Temp.<br />
(OF)<br />
1600<br />
1800<br />
1600<br />
uasiaence<br />
Time<br />
(secondg)<br />
1.5<br />
1.5<br />
1.5<br />
ttticiency,<br />
by weight<br />
(XI<br />
99.83, b<br />
99.77<br />
99.9~~<br />
EPA<br />
Sanpling<br />
Runs<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Atactic wastea 1800 1.5 99.9~5~ 3<br />
Atactic wastea 2000 1.5 99.986 1<br />
Waste Gas + Atactic wastea 1600 1.5 99.995C 2<br />
Waste Gas + Atactic waste: 1800 1.5 99.997C 2 -<br />
Waste Gas + Atactic Waste 20100 1.5 99.996' 2<br />
Denka, Maleic Anhydride Waste as^ EPA 5<br />
Houston, TX<br />
Rohm & Haas<br />
Deer Park, TX<br />
Union Carbide Corp,,<br />
Taft, LA<br />
Petro-tex Chemical Corp.,<br />
Houston, TX<br />
Acrylic Acid &<br />
Esters<br />
Acrylic Acid 8<br />
Acrylate Esters<br />
d<br />
Waste Gasd<br />
Waste Gasd<br />
Waste Gas<br />
Waste as^<br />
Waste h as^<br />
EPA 3<br />
4<br />
Butadiene Waste c as^ Petro-tex 2 sets<br />
Wonsanto Chemical Acryloni trile Waste as^ Confidential Confidential 99 Monsanto 2 units<br />
Intermediates, Co.,<br />
Alvin, TX<br />
a~upplemented with natural gas to improve combustion.<br />
b~verage <strong>of</strong> mean test results maasured by each <strong>of</strong> four methods: proposed EPA Method 18 (on-site) for total hydrocarbons, proposed EPA Method 18 (<strong>of</strong>f-site<br />
for individual hydrocarbons, Byron Instruments Models 90 and 401 in combination for total hydrocarbons, and Byron Instruments Models 90 and 401 for<br />
total nonmethane hydrocarbons.<br />
'~vera~e<strong>of</strong> mean test results measured by each <strong>of</strong> three methods: proposed EPA Method 18 (on-site) for total hydrocarbons, Byron Instruments Models 90 and<br />
401 i n combination for total hydrocarbons, and Byron Instruments Models 90 and 401 for total nonmethane hydrocarbons.<br />
*supplemented with gas to improve combustion.<br />
e~verage efficiency for tests after completion <strong>of</strong> major modifications to improve mixing.<br />
EPA<br />
.<br />
6<br />
3
Change language