27.04.2013 Views

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Manufacturing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

epresent excellent agreement for such "study" estimates.<br />

Because these cost factors vary so widely, it is more meaningful<br />

to compare the purchased or installed capital costs than the<br />

annual ized.<br />

The differences between the Polymers and Resins and Air<br />

Oxidation CTG design parameters are re1 atively small and<br />

impact the purchase costs only about 20 percent. (See<br />

Appendix B <strong>of</strong> Air Oxidation CTG and Appendix E <strong>of</strong> this CTG.)<br />

Moreover, the Enviroscience report "<strong>Control</strong> Device Evaluation<br />

for Thermal Oxidizers" (December 1979) states that a VOC<br />

control efficiency <strong>of</strong> 98 percent or greater is achievable<br />

with a 1,500°F combustion temperature, the basis for the<br />

GARD costs. Thus, it is likely, a1 though less certain than<br />

for 1600°F, that the GARD incinerator can also meet the<br />

98 percent emission reduction alternative listed in the CTG.<br />

summarize: The GARD and Enviroscience thermal incinerator<br />

costs can both meet the costing requirements <strong>of</strong> the CTG. The differences<br />

between the two sets <strong>of</strong> costs fall within the accuracy 1 imits <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CTG estimates. Further, the GARD data are as current and as well-founded<br />

as the Enviroscience costs. Because <strong>of</strong> this, it makes little technical<br />

difference which costs are used in the document. In deference to CMA,<br />

thermal incinerator costs in this version <strong>of</strong> the CTG are based on<br />

Envi roscience.<br />

C.4.2. Cost Effectiveness Calculations<br />

TCC noted that existing control levels for eight HDPE slurry and<br />

solution process plants varied <strong>from</strong> - 696 percent (already meeting<br />

RACT) to +92 percent <strong>of</strong> the uncontrolled emission rate for the model<br />

plants. TCC, therefore, questioned the validity <strong>of</strong> the cost effectiveness<br />

analyses, especially if the 98 percent reduction were based on uncontrolled<br />

model plant levels. Similarly, Monsanto was concerned that the cost<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> RACT for polystyrene would be unreasonably high for<br />

plants that were already well controlled.<br />

Response:<br />

TCC1s concern about the cost effectiveness <strong>of</strong> existing plants<br />

with varying degrees <strong>of</strong> control is unwarranted. The 98 percent reduction

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!