05.06.2013 Views

Williams-Climate-change-refugia-for-terrestrial-biodiversity_0

Williams-Climate-change-refugia-for-terrestrial-biodiversity_0

Williams-Climate-change-refugia-for-terrestrial-biodiversity_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Regional 3-second gridded models<br />

Four models of vascular plant species compositional turnover were developed <strong>for</strong> case<br />

study areas in eastern Australia (Figure 1) using 3-second gridded predictor data<br />

(Table 6). The larger number of sites associated with the floristic survey data compiled<br />

by NSW OEH required sampling of site-pairs <strong>for</strong> GDM analysis. Approximately 900,000<br />

site-pairs were applied in the final model. Data from the local case studies derived<br />

from CSIRO surveys were used with all site-pairs, after filtering by richness consistent<br />

with the restricted survey methodology.<br />

Geographic distance was a significant variable in all four models and proportionally<br />

more important in the model applied to NSW (Table 7). Forty-one of the candidate<br />

predictors were included in at least one model (Table 8). Monthly minimum<br />

temperature (TNI) was particularly important as a predictor in southeast NSW and<br />

maximum evaporation (EPX) <strong>for</strong> the model developed <strong>for</strong> the entire state. Among the<br />

substrate variables kaolinite clay minerals in the lower soil horizon (KAO80) was a<br />

significant predictor <strong>for</strong> the NSW model. The general structure of the fitted model <strong>for</strong><br />

each dataset is presented in Figure 17 and Figure 18.<br />

Table A7-13. Summary of GDM model fitting <strong>for</strong> eastern Australian case study<br />

areas using 3-sec gridded predictors.<br />

Study # site- %Deviance Intercept Summed<br />

# Richness<br />

dataset pairs Explained<br />

Coefficients predictors filter<br />

NSW OEH 885,376 45.78 1.12 14.00 20 None<br />

CSIRO SE<br />

NSW<br />

542,361 33.82 0.57 10.59 17 7 or more<br />

Table A7-14. Relative contribution of predictor variable groups (sum of<br />

coefficient values).<br />

Study dataset<br />

<strong>Climate</strong><br />

(including topoclimate)<br />

Substrate Land<strong>for</strong>m<br />

<strong>Climate</strong>,<br />

substrate and<br />

land<strong>for</strong>m<br />

Geographic<br />

Distance<br />

NSW OEH 6.78 3.79 0.70 11.27 2.74<br />

CSIRO SE NSW 5.70 1.65 1.67 9.02 1.57<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> <strong>refugia</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>terrestrial</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> 195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!