05.06.2013 Views

Williams-Climate-change-refugia-for-terrestrial-biodiversity_0

Williams-Climate-change-refugia-for-terrestrial-biodiversity_0

Williams-Climate-change-refugia-for-terrestrial-biodiversity_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 1: (Left) The areas of Australia that have the greatest stability in<br />

temperature (the 10 th percentile of the minimum distance an organism would<br />

have to travel by 2085 to stay within 2 SDs of current norms are shown in blue);<br />

(Right) the areas with the greatest biotic <strong>refugia</strong> potential between now and 2085.<br />

The biotic <strong>refugia</strong> potential index (as shown in Figure 24) is the aggregation of the<br />

highest percentile <strong>for</strong> modelled incoming and lowest percentile <strong>for</strong> modelled outgoing<br />

species in each of the four taxonomic groups summed together. The darker colours<br />

indicate the highest score, which corresponds to the greatest overlap of indices. The<br />

two approaches give broadly concordant results. Increasing values on the scale bars<br />

indicate increasing climate stability and increasing biotic stability respectively.<br />

3.4.1 Environmental stability<br />

Here we investigated <strong>change</strong> in climate in the past as well as that of a projected future.<br />

We measured shift in climatic variables on both an absolute scale (<strong>for</strong> annual mean<br />

temperature), a proportional scale (proportional difference from current precipitation),<br />

and a relative scale (<strong>for</strong> both temperature and precipitation). The relative measure was<br />

the SD of current inter-annual variation in our climate metrics.<br />

When examining future climate projections, there is inevitable uncertainty, much of<br />

which is captured by variation across the various GCMs used to develop climate<br />

projections. There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>for</strong> all our inference about the future, we report results across<br />

the 18 GCMs under the RCP that we are most closely tracking (RCP 8.5, which is the<br />

IPCC’s worst- case scenario).<br />

The future climate projections show that here are very few parts of the Australian<br />

continent that will see temperature shifts less than two SDs above current conditions.<br />

The full range of outcomes across different RCPs and GCMs can be found in<br />

APPENDIX 2. <strong>Climate</strong> stability. These are shifts of similar magnitude (but opposite in<br />

direction) to those seen during the last ice age (<strong>change</strong>s which occurred over<br />

thousands of years, instead of the 72 years of our <strong>for</strong>ecast period).<br />

As well as assessing the projected climate <strong>change</strong>, we also assessed paleological<br />

climate <strong>change</strong>. The reason paleological climate <strong>change</strong> is important is because<br />

regions with little climate <strong>change</strong> in the past tend to be rich in endemic species and<br />

species that are less resilient to future climate <strong>change</strong>. By identifying areas with high<br />

paleological climate stability, we expect to identify areas where the largest number of<br />

endemic, low- resilience species are likely to live. If these areas are not the same as<br />

our <strong>refugia</strong> under climate <strong>change</strong>, then we are at increased risk of <strong>biodiversity</strong> loss.<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> <strong>refugia</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>terrestrial</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!