10.06.2013 Views

Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

Tellurite And Fluorotellurite Glasses For Active And Passive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7. Surface properties; MDO 278<br />

It can be seen that the peak is highly asymmetric, incorporating higher energy shoulders<br />

at 532.4 eV (46.3 %), and 533.9 eV (7.2 %), to the main peak at 530.6 eV (46.5 %). This<br />

peak was asymmetric, with a higher bonding energy shoulder at 532.4 eV (17.5 %), to the<br />

main peak at 530.9 eV (82.5 %). Table (7.5) summarises the quantitative analysis for this<br />

glass from the high resolution scans.<br />

Table (7.5): Quantitative analysis from high resolution XPS scans of polished glass<br />

MOD015 (82.5TeO2-7.5WO3-10Nb2O5 mol. %), and theoretical peak positions and<br />

atomic % batched.<br />

XPS peak<br />

Theoretical<br />

Peak / eV At. %<br />

High resolution XPS scan<br />

Peak / eV At. % Wt. %<br />

O 1s 530.4 68.35 530.5 78.52 32.23<br />

Te 3d5/2 576.2 23.74 576.4 16.65 54.51<br />

W 4d5/2 248.0 2.16 247.1 0.75 3.55<br />

Nd 3d5/2 207.6 5.76 207.1 4.08 9.71<br />

It can be seen by comparing table (7.4) and (7.5), for the polished surface and cleave<br />

respectively, that the polished glass surface was relatively oxygen rich, and tellurium and<br />

tungsten deficient, compared to the batched and cleaved compositions (14.9 to 65.1 %<br />

variation from batched values).<br />

7.2.1.3. XPS of fluorotellurite glasses<br />

XPS spectra of two fluorotellurite glasses will be shown here, with varying melting time.<br />

The effect of this processing should be manifested in the ratio of F1s / O1s peaks in the<br />

XPS spectra.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!