11.06.2013 Views

Self-Assembly of Synthetic and Biological Polymeric Systems of ...

Self-Assembly of Synthetic and Biological Polymeric Systems of ...

Self-Assembly of Synthetic and Biological Polymeric Systems of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

exhibit an important contrast imaging effect, which confirms<br />

their potential use as MRI contrast agents. Future work will<br />

involve the refinement <strong>of</strong> the synthetic process to achieve<br />

perfect control <strong>of</strong> magnetic coverage, <strong>and</strong> thus hybrid fibril<br />

widths, magnetic nanowire lengths, population distribution<br />

<strong>and</strong> in vivo assays.<br />

Experimental Section<br />

Materials: Human serum albumin, lysozyme, FeCl2 <strong>and</strong> FeCl3 were obtained<br />

from Sigma Chemical. Proteins were used after further purification<br />

by liquid chromatography over a Superdex 75 column equilibrated<br />

with phosphate (0.01 m). All other chemicals were <strong>of</strong> the highest purity<br />

available. Experiments were carried out with doubly distilled, deionised<br />

<strong>and</strong> degassed water.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> HSA <strong>and</strong> lysozyme fibril solutions: Protein fibril solutions<br />

were prepared by well-established protocols. [16] Briefly, HSA fibril stock<br />

solution was made by dissolving the protein to a final concentration typically<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2 mg mL 1 in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, ionic strength 10 mm)<br />

<strong>and</strong> brought to pH 2.0 by addition <strong>of</strong> HCl. Lysozyme fibrils were obtained<br />

by forming a stock solution (2 mg mL 1 ) in glycine buffer (pH 2.0,<br />

ionic strength 10 mm). Both protein stock solutions were dialysed extensively<br />

against pure buffer. Protein concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically,<br />

with use <strong>of</strong> molar absorption coefficients <strong>of</strong> 35219<br />

<strong>and</strong> 37 609 m 1 cm 1 at 280 nm for HSA <strong>and</strong> Lys, respectively. [40] Before incubation,<br />

the solutions were filtered through a 0.2 mm filter into sterile<br />

test tubes. Samples were incubated at 65 8C in a reactor under reflux for<br />

10 <strong>and</strong> 3 days for HSA <strong>and</strong> Lys, respectively.<br />

Characterisation <strong>of</strong> the fibrils: Protein suspensions were applied to<br />

carbon-coated copper grids, blotted, washed, negatively stained with<br />

phosphotungstic acid (2%, w/v), air dried <strong>and</strong> then examined with a Phillips<br />

CM-12 transmission electron microscope operating at an accelerating<br />

voltage <strong>of</strong> 120 kV. Samples were diluted 20–200-fold when needed prior<br />

to deposition on the grids.<br />

Magnetic nanowire synthesis: A stock solution (typically 2 g L 1 ) <strong>of</strong><br />

either lysozyme or HSA fibrils was diluted 600-fold to avoid the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> undesired aggregates during the synthesis <strong>of</strong> the magnetite nanowire.<br />

Different [Fe]/ACHTUNGTRENUNG[protein] molar ratios (10:1, 25:1 50:1, 100:1, 200:1 <strong>and</strong><br />

400:1) <strong>and</strong> sequential additions (one to five) <strong>of</strong> the iron salts were tested<br />

to enable the formation <strong>of</strong> magnetite nanoparticles on the biotemplate<br />

surface <strong>and</strong> to ensure full coverage <strong>of</strong> the fibril surface. In a typical synthesis,<br />

an aliquot (100 mL) <strong>of</strong> lysozyme fibril solution (2 gL 1 , 1.34 ”<br />

10 4 m) was placed in a flask reactor <strong>and</strong> diluted with doubly distilled, deionised<br />

water (60 mL). Fibril solution was left to incubate at 65 8C for 1 h<br />

with magnetic stirring. Separately, two aqueous solutions containing<br />

FeCl2 (25.4 mg, 0.1 m) <strong>and</strong> FeCl3, respectively, (64.9 mg, 0.1 m) were prepared<br />

<strong>and</strong> mixed in a 1:2 molar ratio. After the incubation period at<br />

658C, the temperature <strong>of</strong> the fibril solution was raised to 80 8C, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

specific volume <strong>of</strong> the iron salt mixed solution suitable to get the desired<br />

[Fe]/ACHTUNGTRENUNG[protein] molar ratio was then added under nitrogen. The solution<br />

was left to incubate for 3 h before the addition <strong>of</strong> NH4OH (1.5 m, 2 mL);<br />

the resulting solution was allowed to react for an additional 1 h <strong>and</strong> allowed<br />

to cool to room temperature. Stabilisation <strong>of</strong> the nanowires was<br />

additionally achieved by addition <strong>of</strong> sodium citrate solution (10 mm,<br />

1 mL) to the resulting nanowires at 80 8C <strong>and</strong> allowing to incubate for<br />

90 min. The resulting biohybrid solution was dialysed through a dialysis<br />

membrane (SpectraPor, Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, 100 kDa) to remove remaining iron<br />

salts, NH4OH <strong>and</strong> sodium citrate. If required, fresh additions <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> Fe salt solutions were carried out under the same conditions<br />

as previously specified to ensure the full magnetic coverage <strong>of</strong> fibrils <strong>and</strong><br />

to create a nanowire.<br />

Characterisation <strong>of</strong> magnetic 1D assemblies <strong>and</strong> nanowires: TEM images<br />

were obtained with a transmission electron microscope (Phillips CM-12)<br />

operating at an accelerating voltage <strong>of</strong> 120 kV as previously described.<br />

HR-TEM images <strong>and</strong> SAED patterns were obtained with a transmission<br />

7372<br />

electron microscope (Carl-Zeiss Libra 200 FE-EFTEM) operating at<br />

200 kV. X-ray diffraction experiments were carried out with a rotating<br />

anode X-ray generator (Siemens D5005). Twin Gçbel mirrors were used<br />

to produce a well-collimated beam <strong>of</strong> CuKa radiation (l = 1.5418 A). Xray<br />

diffraction patterns were recorded with an imaging plate detector<br />

(AXS F.Nr. J2–394). FTIR spectra <strong>of</strong> HSA in aqueous solutions were determined<br />

with a FTIR spectrometer (model IFS-66v from Bruker) with a<br />

horizontal ZnS ATR accessory. The spectra were obtained at a resolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2 cm 1 <strong>and</strong> generally 200 scans were accumulated to provide a reasonable<br />

signal-to-noise ratio. Magnetic susceptibility measurements were carried<br />

out with a SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design MPMS5, San<br />

Diego, CA). Iron concentrations <strong>of</strong> each sample for SQUID, relaxivity<br />

<strong>and</strong> MRI were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission<br />

spectroscopy (ICP-AES, Varian).<br />

Magnetic resonance measurements <strong>and</strong> MRI imaging: Transverse <strong>and</strong><br />

longitudinal relaxation times were also measured at 9.4 T (400 MHz) <strong>and</strong><br />

378C with a Bruker Biospin USR94/20 instrument (Ettlingen, Germany).<br />

An inversion-recovery pulse sequence was used to measure the longitudinal<br />

relaxation times with 16 inversion recovery times logarithmically<br />

spaced. Both Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) <strong>and</strong> spin-echo pulse<br />

sequences were used to measure transverse relaxation times. MRI phantoms<br />

were constructed in agarose solutions (Sigma–Aldrich, 4%, w/v),<br />

heated <strong>and</strong> stirred at 80 8C until complete solution <strong>of</strong> the solid agarose.<br />

Then, with the system still remaining fluid, six HPLC vials (Cromlab,<br />

Spain, 250 mL) were filled with the agarose solution (100 mL) <strong>and</strong> allowed<br />

to cool to room temperature. Protein solution (5, 10, 15, 25, 50 or<br />

100 mL) was then deposited over the surfaces <strong>of</strong> the agarose gels, <strong>and</strong> distilled<br />

water (49, 45, 40, 35, 25 <strong>and</strong> 0 mL, respectively) was added to the<br />

solutions to make the final volumes even at 150 mL per vial. After a waiting<br />

period <strong>of</strong> at least 30 min, most <strong>of</strong> the deposited fluid had been absorbed<br />

by the agarose gels, after which semi-gelificated agarose solution<br />

(50 mL, 10 %, w/v, heated to 80 8C for solution <strong>and</strong> cooled to about 40–<br />

508C before addition) was added to each phantom to seal them. Imaging<br />

<strong>of</strong> the phantoms was performed with the previously described Bruker<br />

Biospin system with 440 mT m 1 gradients. A 3D-Gradient Echo image<br />

was acquired (T2*-weighting) with the following parameters: field <strong>of</strong><br />

view: 28.8 ”19.2 ”2 mm, matrix size: 288 ” 192 ”40 points giving a spatial<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> 100 ”100 ”200 mm, echo time TE = 8 ms, repetition time<br />

TR=100 ms <strong>and</strong> flip angle = 30.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

P. Taboada et al.<br />

The authors thank the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN) for<br />

research project MAT 2010–17336, the Xunta de Galicia for research<br />

project INCITE09206020PR <strong>and</strong> for European Regional Development<br />

Funds (research project 2010/50), <strong>and</strong> the Fundación Ramón Areces for<br />

additional financial support. We acknowledge the contributions <strong>of</strong> B. Argibay,<br />

P. Ramos-Cabrer <strong>and</strong> J. Castillo from the Clinical Neurosciences<br />

Research Laboratory <strong>of</strong> the Clinical Hospital <strong>of</strong> Santiago de Compostela<br />

for the MR images acquired with the 9.4 T MR system.<br />

[1] Y. N. Xia, P. D. Yang, Y. G. Sun, Y. Y. Wu, B. Mayers, B. Gates,<br />

Y. D. Yin, F. Kim, Y. Q. Yan, Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 353 – 389.<br />

[2] a) C. Ross, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2001, 31, 203 –235; b) J. M. Kinsella,<br />

A. Ivanisevic, J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 3191 –3193; c) C.<br />

Goubault, P. Jop, M. Fermigier, J. Baudry, E. Bertr<strong>and</strong>, J. Bibetter,<br />

Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 260 802; d) J.-H. Park, G. von Maltzahn, L.<br />

Zhang„ M. P. Schwartz, E. Ruoslathi, S. N. Bathia, M. J. Sailor, Adv.<br />

Mater. 2008, 20, 1630 –1635.<br />

[3] S. Minko, A. Kiriy, G. Gorodyska, M. Stamm, J. Am. Chem. Soc.<br />

2002, 124, 10192.<br />

[4] a) N. Duxin, F. T. Liu, H. Vali, A. Eisenberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc.<br />

2005, 127, 10063 – 10069; b) Y. Piao, J. Kim, H. B. Na, D. Kim, J. S.<br />

Baek, M. K. Ko, J. H. Lee, M. Shokouhimehr, T. Hyeon, Nat. Mater.<br />

2008, 7, 242 –247.<br />

www.chemeurj.org 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7366 – 7373

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!