18.06.2013 Views

Boundary Lyer Theory

Boundary Lyer Theory

Boundary Lyer Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

082<br />

XXII. Thc incomprm~il~lr L~lrbtrlolt bn~rndnry lnyrr<br />

wherc bhr following numerical vnlncs (cf. Table 22.2 - energy method) have been<br />

employed :<br />

b = 0.152; v' .= 80 v; with flq(rI) = v' {[U(r1)J2 R3(xl))lCb.<br />

(22.22 b)<br />

This explicit formula cont,nins only t.hr extmnal free-strcam vclocity U(x) which<br />

mny IIC known from pot,cnt,ial t.hcory or from mcasarement. The positmion .2: = xl<br />

constit.ntes t,he st.nrt,ing point for t,he calculation.<br />

Apart from the velocity U(xl), the constant of integrntion E3(rl) rontains also<br />

the encrgy thickness 63(.cl). If the station xl coincides with the point of transitmion<br />

the cnergy thickness should be ralc~llatcd over the laminar boundary layer in t.hc<br />

rangc 0 2 x xl Here x = 0 rlenotcx thc start of t,he boundary layer; for example,<br />

the leading edge of a plate or the stagnation point of a blunt body. It waa shown in<br />

11141 that eqn. (22.22a) is also valid for laminar boundary layers whenb = 1, vi =<br />

v/Q& = 0.91 7v and lC3(xl = 0) = 0 should be specificd. In this case, with a laminar<br />

starting length, the constant of integration becomes<br />

112<br />

(point of transition). (22.23)<br />

If the boundary lnyer drcntly is t,urbulent at z = XI, it is necessary to substitute<br />

into eqn. (22.22) for E3(z1) t,he local vnlue R3(x1) = n3(x1) U(xl)/v.<br />

In many practirnl npplicnt.ions it. is not enough to know the \)cl~aviour of t,hc<br />

boundary-layer thickness, lwre t,hc encrgy t.hickness &(x). This is the case wit,h<br />

ueparation-prone or separat,ctl boundary hyers. If, for example, it is necessary t,o<br />

makc n statcmcnt about t.he possibiliby of separation, it is necessary to know the<br />

velocity parameters along the wdl. All mct,hods discussed in Sec. XXIIbl provide<br />

procedures for t,he calouletion of sonir xhnpe fnctor in addition to tht of a boundarylayer<br />

t~liiclrncsx, such as the niomcnt,~~m thickness &(x) discussed t.here. The shapc<br />

factors nre defined differently in diff'rrent methods and different differential equations<br />

are specified for thcir ralrnlation. A revicw and intercomparison was given by J.C.<br />

Roth [85].<br />

l'hc diPFrrcwt,inl rq11r21~ion (22.!h, 1)) for t.hc shnpr. factors 1132(x) and Hz3(~) were<br />

obtained by tlic coupling of thc ~~ior~~rnturn-integral and energy-integrnl equnt.ions<br />

(22.78, b). Thc pereding dilTrrent,inl equntions det,ermine the shape factor in a unique<br />

way proviclrcl that onc-para~net~cr velocity profiles Hlz.= f(H32) or Hlz = f(Hm)<br />

nrc post,ulnt,ctl and npproxiniak cxprrsxions for t,he shear-stress coefficients CT and<br />

co are s~hst.itllt.c11 from rqn. (22.Rn, b). The dct,crmining equntion (22.11b) for thc<br />

shapr factor cnn br writ.tm in t,crms of thc naodijied shape lactor If = f(llzs) proposed<br />

by 15. l'r~~rlrcnl~rotlt.. l'ogcl.hcr with rqn. (22.11a), this relnt,ion forms a system of<br />

simultn.rous tliffrrrnhl equations for t,l~e Reync~lds number formed wit,h t,lte energy<br />

t,hickncss, Ra(:v). and for thc shapt factor 11(a)! According to Table 22.1 we must<br />

put TN -.- 2 =- const 1tr1 Ihr rnrlgy ntcthotl clisrussed herc 7'hc forms of the funrtions<br />

cl,3(RR, 11) nnd lli3(R3. If) arr lo Irr taltrll Irom thc same talrlc Rcference[ll4]summarizci<br />

cqns (22 1 I n) nntl (22 1 1 0) as follows :<br />

with<br />

and<br />

Z<br />

G1(x) = G(q) + j y' un-' dx,<br />

where n is listed in Tablc 22.2 (energy method). The correction function y'(x) =<br />

yf(R3, H) can be calculated with the aid of a(ll), b(H), u(H), /l(II), If12(x), 1fS2(H),<br />

as well as R3(2) and N(x).<br />

The correction y' differs by a larger or smaller amount from the value 1.0 in the<br />

case of a turbulent boundary layer, nnd cannot bc determined with an adrqunte<br />

degree of reliability. 13y way of approximation, we assume y'(x) = const = 1.0 and<br />

introducc a new quantity c = const = 4.0 in order further to simplify the analytic<br />

solution. The qunntily c has been. so dct~ermincd as to nchicve optimum ngrccmcnl<br />

between available measurements [64] and theoretical results; see also [114]. The<br />

modified shape factor is obtained from the equation<br />

which is the result of somc algchraic txansformations not reproduced Itcrc. llerc thc<br />

influence /unctions of the external velocity distribution are defined os<br />

The initial valuw, i.0. the constants of intcgration are<br />

We take the numerical constants as<br />

The integral expression (22.25) for the calculation of the shape factor contains<br />

only the external velocily distribution U(x), as was the case with the corresponding<br />

integral expression (22.22) for the calculation of the Rcynolds number. The detm-<br />

mination of the inllucncc function N(r) rcquircs thc pcrformnnco of n doublc inLc-<br />

gration with respect to x. The position x = xl once again represents the starting<br />

point of the calculation.<br />

The constants of integration G(s1) and N(xl) contain the shape factor lI(xl)<br />

in addition to the'velocity U(xl) and thc Reynolds number R3(xl). If the position<br />

xl coincides with the point. of transition, it, is necessary to require that the encrgy<br />

thickness of the laminar boundnry layer must be equal to that of the turbulent.<br />

boundary lnyer in accordance with eqn. (22.23). On the other hand, the shapc factor<br />

may change it.s value at the point of trnnsition. The numcricnl values of bl~c shapc<br />

fnctor lic in t,hc mngc 1.0 2 11 2 Ils = 0.723.<br />

2,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!