Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FA06<br />
2 - Investigating the Relationship between R&D and Marketing in the<br />
New Product Development Process<br />
Suj Chandrasekhar, Principal, Strategic Insights Inc., 162 Collins Road<br />
NE, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52402, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />
suj@strategicinsights.com, Srinath Gopalakrishna<br />
In this research, the authors focus on the R&D/Marketing interface within<br />
organizations and investigate the different dimensions and levels <strong>of</strong> this relationship.<br />
Typically, the Marketing team is very concerned with new product launch deadlines<br />
and in many instances the expressed view is that meeting deadlines receive priority<br />
and resources at the expense <strong>of</strong> potential breakthrough concepts that require<br />
extended deliberation. Building on Kotler, Walcott and Chandrasekhar (2008), we<br />
explore this subject empirically by examining the quality <strong>of</strong> the working relationship<br />
between R&D and Marketing in several companies spanning several industries and<br />
countries. The data come from surveys <strong>of</strong> marketers, R&D personnel, engineers and<br />
product managers at senior and middle management levels via an online assessment<br />
questionnaire. Select executives were also interviewed. In this paper, we examine the<br />
perceived levels <strong>of</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> Marketing to NPD as well as the type <strong>of</strong><br />
relationship between R&D and Marketing. We account for company size, geographic<br />
region and industry variability while addressing the following questions: What are<br />
the reported levels <strong>of</strong> engagement between Marketing and R&D and how do they<br />
vary by company size and industry? What are the perceived contributions <strong>of</strong><br />
Marketing to the stages <strong>of</strong> the new product development process? What steps can a<br />
company take to improve the working relationship between R&D and Marketing? We<br />
report on Marketing’s contribution to NPD in four areas (ideation, early stage concept<br />
refinement, development, and launch/post-launch) and the types <strong>of</strong> relationship<br />
between the two functions.<br />
3 - Embedding Product Development Accelerations in<br />
Environmental Uncertainty<br />
Tao Wu, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, California State University,<br />
Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA, 90840,<br />
United States <strong>of</strong> America, twu5@csulb.edu<br />
Past new product development (NPD) research suggested that in uncertain<br />
environments, contingency planning, concurrent development, early customer<br />
feedback, and iterations improve firms’ cycle time and even product performance in<br />
general. However, a review <strong>of</strong> organizational learning literature reveals contradictory<br />
demands that these practices place on organizations’ information processing:<br />
Contingency planning and concurrent development require firms to have a relative<br />
clear understanding <strong>of</strong>, and be able to accurately predict, the future <strong>of</strong> the market,<br />
while early customer feedbacks and iterations are more effective when firms are<br />
vague in their perceptions <strong>of</strong> the market behaviors. In addition, these NPD practices<br />
have been examined mostly with the concept <strong>of</strong> environmental uncertainty as onedimensional,<br />
which precludes contextual understandings <strong>of</strong> the findings. This<br />
research is set out to further explore the impact <strong>of</strong> each aforementioned practice on<br />
NPD performance under different types <strong>of</strong> environmental uncertainty. It differentiates<br />
environmental uncertainty based on the degree to which companies understand<br />
and/or can accurately predict the future <strong>of</strong> the market. Through empirical<br />
examination <strong>of</strong> 164 product development firms, it proposes a typology <strong>of</strong> combining<br />
these practices in uncertain environments to maximize NPD performance.<br />
4 - Consumer Opinion <strong>of</strong> Product Design Dimensions<br />
Wooseong Kang, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, North Carolina State University,<br />
2332 Nelson Hall, Raleigh, NC, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />
Wooseong_Kang@NCSU.edu, Janell Townsend,<br />
Mitzi Montoya<br />
Product design is a critical component <strong>of</strong> brand strategy. We develop a conceptual<br />
framework illustrating how two critical design factors – form and function – impact<br />
consumer opinion, and delineate brand specific effects. We further identify nonmonotonic<br />
effects, as well as the interaction effects <strong>of</strong> the individual factors among<br />
the dimensions. A longitudinal model based on objective measures <strong>of</strong> form and<br />
function is tested with a data set we developed for models available in the U.S.<br />
automotive market from 1999 – 2007. The data include information on 16 firms, 32<br />
brands and 137 products. The results suggest form and function play a significant role<br />
in forming consumer opinions, but have diminishing returns. However, the results<br />
suggest brands may benefit from an extension <strong>of</strong> certain design factors. Trade-<strong>of</strong>fs<br />
between form factors generally moderate each other, but that does not appear to be<br />
so for function factors. The relationships between factors <strong>of</strong> form and function are<br />
multifarious and complex, but generally do not support the notion <strong>of</strong> trade-<strong>of</strong>fs<br />
between form and function as being a cause for changes in opinion.<br />
■ FA06<br />
Legends Ballroom VII<br />
Channels I: General<br />
Contributed Session<br />
Chair: Sudheer Gupta, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Simon Fraser University, 8888<br />
University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada, sudheerg@sfu.ca<br />
1 - Information Sharing and New Product Development in a<br />
Non-integrated Distribution Channel<br />
Shan-Yu Chou, National Taiwan University, 1 Sec. 4 Roosevelt Road,<br />
Taipei, Taiwan - ROC, chousyster@gmail.com<br />
A manufacturer, when developing new products, <strong>of</strong>ten faces high demand<br />
uncertainty. A retailer, closer to consumers, may possess superior information relative<br />
MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011<br />
38<br />
to the manufacturer about final demands <strong>of</strong> a new product. In this paper, we attempt<br />
to analyze how information sharing influences new product development in a nonintegrated<br />
channel. We build a game-theoretic model where the retailer facing two<br />
segments <strong>of</strong> consumers, has private information about the final demand <strong>of</strong> the new<br />
product, while it is the manufacturer that makes the new product investment before<br />
demand realization. We obtain the following results. (i)The value <strong>of</strong> information<br />
sharing depends on the positioning <strong>of</strong> the new product item relative to the<br />
manufacturer’s current product item. Under some regularity conditions, when the<br />
new product that the manufacturer is considering to develop is a high-end item, the<br />
manufacturer cannot benefit from information sharing from the retailer. (ii) On the<br />
other hand, when the new product that the manufacturer is considering to develop is<br />
a low-end item and when it is sufficiently costly to increase the success rate <strong>of</strong> the<br />
new product, information sharing helps both the manufacturer and the retailer. (iii)<br />
However, when it is not very costly to increase the success rate for the new product,<br />
information sharing from the retailer to the manufacturer reduces the retailer’s pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
more than it increases the manufacturer’s pr<strong>of</strong>it. In the absence <strong>of</strong> information<br />
sharing, the manufacturer in a non-integrated channel will still develop the new<br />
product and make an efficient investment that maximizes channel pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />
2 - Distributor Support in New Product Launch<br />
Wei Guan, Linköping University, IEI 581 83, Linköping, Sweden,<br />
wei.guan@liu.se, Jakob Rehme<br />
Many companies usually commit to develop and produce new products and delegate<br />
the selling aspects to distributors. It is recognized that distributors play an important<br />
role in bringing products to customers and that distributors have their own business<br />
objectives. Despite its importance, research regarding distributor support in the new<br />
product launch is few in number. This paper seeks to fill the gaps by empirically<br />
analyzing how distributors support is obtained for new products. The first purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
this paper is to investigate how distributors’ selling effort, advertising and technical<br />
support are organized for new products and how these differ from more established<br />
items. The second objective is to examine the consequent demands and requirements<br />
posed to suppliers. The third objective is to explore insights into potential areas for<br />
future product or service innovation. This study takes an exploratory, case study<br />
research approach. Multiple cases regarding innovative products or solutions recently<br />
came out to the British building material market were studied. Data is collected<br />
through in depth interviews using an open-ended format. Findings Distributors are<br />
starting to understand that they can not make successful new product launch at the<br />
store level without a well functioning supplier operations. New product sales <strong>of</strong><br />
distributors is more and more relying on suppliers in aspects <strong>of</strong> logistics, commercial<br />
and technology. Marketing support regarding pricing, promotion and merchandising<br />
from suppliers is extremely important for distributors in selling new products.<br />
Previous new product launch studies focus primarily on strategic and tactical<br />
decisions made by suppliers, this paper emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> distributor<br />
support.<br />
3 - Long-term Asymmetric Buyer-seller Relationship:<br />
An Empirical Study<br />
Yuying Shi, PhD Student, University <strong>of</strong> Florida, Warrington College <strong>of</strong><br />
Business, 211 Bry, Gainesville, FL, 32606, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />
sunnyshi@ufl.edu, Qiong Wang, Bart Weitz<br />
Long-term relationships between buyers and suppliers have obtained substantial<br />
attention in the past decades. Although much as been written about the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
such relationships to firms, little is known about the nature <strong>of</strong> such relationships. In<br />
this study, we empirically assess one type <strong>of</strong> long-term relationships composed <strong>of</strong><br />
suppliers and their major buyers, in particular those retailers who purchase at least<br />
10 percent <strong>of</strong> the total sales <strong>of</strong> these suppliers. Using cross-sectional and longitudinal<br />
data over a 20-year period, we find that suppliers may benefit from having major<br />
retailers in terms <strong>of</strong> their financial performance despite <strong>of</strong> the power asymmetry.<br />
Specifically, the retailers’ relative sizes, R&D and advertising investments, and the<br />
lengths <strong>of</strong> relationships with suppliers may moderate the influence <strong>of</strong> major retailers<br />
onto suppliers. Our study sheds lights on why and how a firm develops long-term<br />
relationships with major buyers. We conclude this study with a discussion <strong>of</strong><br />
implications and future research, specifically the demonstrated importance <strong>of</strong><br />
investigating asymmetric buyer-seller relationships.<br />
4 - Inventories, Incentives, and Channel Structure<br />
Sudheer Gupta, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Simon Fraser University, 8888<br />
University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada, sudheerg@sfu.ca<br />
A well-known result in channels literature states that competing manufacturers may<br />
have an incentive to decentralize downstream retailing to buffer from intense price<br />
competition when products are substitutable. We explore this effect in a dynamic<br />
setting where retailers can carry inventories forward. We show that retailers will<br />
always carry inventories as a credible source <strong>of</strong> competition for the manufacturers,<br />
even in the absence <strong>of</strong> traditional reasons for inventories. The presence <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />
inventories in dynamic intra-channel relations counters the benefits <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />
decentralization as a buffer against competition. We establish equilibrium outcomes<br />
for competing manufacturers selling differentiated products over two periods, and<br />
show how degree <strong>of</strong> product differentiation and the ease <strong>of</strong> carrying inventories<br />
forward affect prices, pr<strong>of</strong>its and equilibrium channel structure.