03.07.2013 Views

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FA06<br />

2 - Investigating the Relationship between R&D and Marketing in the<br />

New Product Development Process<br />

Suj Chandrasekhar, Principal, Strategic Insights Inc., 162 Collins Road<br />

NE, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52402, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

suj@strategicinsights.com, Srinath Gopalakrishna<br />

In this research, the authors focus on the R&D/Marketing interface within<br />

organizations and investigate the different dimensions and levels <strong>of</strong> this relationship.<br />

Typically, the Marketing team is very concerned with new product launch deadlines<br />

and in many instances the expressed view is that meeting deadlines receive priority<br />

and resources at the expense <strong>of</strong> potential breakthrough concepts that require<br />

extended deliberation. Building on Kotler, Walcott and Chandrasekhar (2008), we<br />

explore this subject empirically by examining the quality <strong>of</strong> the working relationship<br />

between R&D and Marketing in several companies spanning several industries and<br />

countries. The data come from surveys <strong>of</strong> marketers, R&D personnel, engineers and<br />

product managers at senior and middle management levels via an online assessment<br />

questionnaire. Select executives were also interviewed. In this paper, we examine the<br />

perceived levels <strong>of</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> Marketing to NPD as well as the type <strong>of</strong><br />

relationship between R&D and Marketing. We account for company size, geographic<br />

region and industry variability while addressing the following questions: What are<br />

the reported levels <strong>of</strong> engagement between Marketing and R&D and how do they<br />

vary by company size and industry? What are the perceived contributions <strong>of</strong><br />

Marketing to the stages <strong>of</strong> the new product development process? What steps can a<br />

company take to improve the working relationship between R&D and Marketing? We<br />

report on Marketing’s contribution to NPD in four areas (ideation, early stage concept<br />

refinement, development, and launch/post-launch) and the types <strong>of</strong> relationship<br />

between the two functions.<br />

3 - Embedding Product Development Accelerations in<br />

Environmental Uncertainty<br />

Tao Wu, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, California State University,<br />

Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA, 90840,<br />

United States <strong>of</strong> America, twu5@csulb.edu<br />

Past new product development (NPD) research suggested that in uncertain<br />

environments, contingency planning, concurrent development, early customer<br />

feedback, and iterations improve firms’ cycle time and even product performance in<br />

general. However, a review <strong>of</strong> organizational learning literature reveals contradictory<br />

demands that these practices place on organizations’ information processing:<br />

Contingency planning and concurrent development require firms to have a relative<br />

clear understanding <strong>of</strong>, and be able to accurately predict, the future <strong>of</strong> the market,<br />

while early customer feedbacks and iterations are more effective when firms are<br />

vague in their perceptions <strong>of</strong> the market behaviors. In addition, these NPD practices<br />

have been examined mostly with the concept <strong>of</strong> environmental uncertainty as onedimensional,<br />

which precludes contextual understandings <strong>of</strong> the findings. This<br />

research is set out to further explore the impact <strong>of</strong> each aforementioned practice on<br />

NPD performance under different types <strong>of</strong> environmental uncertainty. It differentiates<br />

environmental uncertainty based on the degree to which companies understand<br />

and/or can accurately predict the future <strong>of</strong> the market. Through empirical<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> 164 product development firms, it proposes a typology <strong>of</strong> combining<br />

these practices in uncertain environments to maximize NPD performance.<br />

4 - Consumer Opinion <strong>of</strong> Product Design Dimensions<br />

Wooseong Kang, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, North Carolina State University,<br />

2332 Nelson Hall, Raleigh, NC, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

Wooseong_Kang@NCSU.edu, Janell Townsend,<br />

Mitzi Montoya<br />

Product design is a critical component <strong>of</strong> brand strategy. We develop a conceptual<br />

framework illustrating how two critical design factors – form and function – impact<br />

consumer opinion, and delineate brand specific effects. We further identify nonmonotonic<br />

effects, as well as the interaction effects <strong>of</strong> the individual factors among<br />

the dimensions. A longitudinal model based on objective measures <strong>of</strong> form and<br />

function is tested with a data set we developed for models available in the U.S.<br />

automotive market from 1999 – 2007. The data include information on 16 firms, 32<br />

brands and 137 products. The results suggest form and function play a significant role<br />

in forming consumer opinions, but have diminishing returns. However, the results<br />

suggest brands may benefit from an extension <strong>of</strong> certain design factors. Trade-<strong>of</strong>fs<br />

between form factors generally moderate each other, but that does not appear to be<br />

so for function factors. The relationships between factors <strong>of</strong> form and function are<br />

multifarious and complex, but generally do not support the notion <strong>of</strong> trade-<strong>of</strong>fs<br />

between form and function as being a cause for changes in opinion.<br />

■ FA06<br />

Legends Ballroom VII<br />

Channels I: General<br />

Contributed Session<br />

Chair: Sudheer Gupta, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Simon Fraser University, 8888<br />

University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada, sudheerg@sfu.ca<br />

1 - Information Sharing and New Product Development in a<br />

Non-integrated Distribution Channel<br />

Shan-Yu Chou, National Taiwan University, 1 Sec. 4 Roosevelt Road,<br />

Taipei, Taiwan - ROC, chousyster@gmail.com<br />

A manufacturer, when developing new products, <strong>of</strong>ten faces high demand<br />

uncertainty. A retailer, closer to consumers, may possess superior information relative<br />

MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011<br />

38<br />

to the manufacturer about final demands <strong>of</strong> a new product. In this paper, we attempt<br />

to analyze how information sharing influences new product development in a nonintegrated<br />

channel. We build a game-theoretic model where the retailer facing two<br />

segments <strong>of</strong> consumers, has private information about the final demand <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

product, while it is the manufacturer that makes the new product investment before<br />

demand realization. We obtain the following results. (i)The value <strong>of</strong> information<br />

sharing depends on the positioning <strong>of</strong> the new product item relative to the<br />

manufacturer’s current product item. Under some regularity conditions, when the<br />

new product that the manufacturer is considering to develop is a high-end item, the<br />

manufacturer cannot benefit from information sharing from the retailer. (ii) On the<br />

other hand, when the new product that the manufacturer is considering to develop is<br />

a low-end item and when it is sufficiently costly to increase the success rate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

new product, information sharing helps both the manufacturer and the retailer. (iii)<br />

However, when it is not very costly to increase the success rate for the new product,<br />

information sharing from the retailer to the manufacturer reduces the retailer’s pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

more than it increases the manufacturer’s pr<strong>of</strong>it. In the absence <strong>of</strong> information<br />

sharing, the manufacturer in a non-integrated channel will still develop the new<br />

product and make an efficient investment that maximizes channel pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />

2 - Distributor Support in New Product Launch<br />

Wei Guan, Linköping University, IEI 581 83, Linköping, Sweden,<br />

wei.guan@liu.se, Jakob Rehme<br />

Many companies usually commit to develop and produce new products and delegate<br />

the selling aspects to distributors. It is recognized that distributors play an important<br />

role in bringing products to customers and that distributors have their own business<br />

objectives. Despite its importance, research regarding distributor support in the new<br />

product launch is few in number. This paper seeks to fill the gaps by empirically<br />

analyzing how distributors support is obtained for new products. The first purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

this paper is to investigate how distributors’ selling effort, advertising and technical<br />

support are organized for new products and how these differ from more established<br />

items. The second objective is to examine the consequent demands and requirements<br />

posed to suppliers. The third objective is to explore insights into potential areas for<br />

future product or service innovation. This study takes an exploratory, case study<br />

research approach. Multiple cases regarding innovative products or solutions recently<br />

came out to the British building material market were studied. Data is collected<br />

through in depth interviews using an open-ended format. Findings Distributors are<br />

starting to understand that they can not make successful new product launch at the<br />

store level without a well functioning supplier operations. New product sales <strong>of</strong><br />

distributors is more and more relying on suppliers in aspects <strong>of</strong> logistics, commercial<br />

and technology. Marketing support regarding pricing, promotion and merchandising<br />

from suppliers is extremely important for distributors in selling new products.<br />

Previous new product launch studies focus primarily on strategic and tactical<br />

decisions made by suppliers, this paper emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> distributor<br />

support.<br />

3 - Long-term Asymmetric Buyer-seller Relationship:<br />

An Empirical Study<br />

Yuying Shi, PhD Student, University <strong>of</strong> Florida, Warrington College <strong>of</strong><br />

Business, 211 Bry, Gainesville, FL, 32606, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

sunnyshi@ufl.edu, Qiong Wang, Bart Weitz<br />

Long-term relationships between buyers and suppliers have obtained substantial<br />

attention in the past decades. Although much as been written about the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

such relationships to firms, little is known about the nature <strong>of</strong> such relationships. In<br />

this study, we empirically assess one type <strong>of</strong> long-term relationships composed <strong>of</strong><br />

suppliers and their major buyers, in particular those retailers who purchase at least<br />

10 percent <strong>of</strong> the total sales <strong>of</strong> these suppliers. Using cross-sectional and longitudinal<br />

data over a 20-year period, we find that suppliers may benefit from having major<br />

retailers in terms <strong>of</strong> their financial performance despite <strong>of</strong> the power asymmetry.<br />

Specifically, the retailers’ relative sizes, R&D and advertising investments, and the<br />

lengths <strong>of</strong> relationships with suppliers may moderate the influence <strong>of</strong> major retailers<br />

onto suppliers. Our study sheds lights on why and how a firm develops long-term<br />

relationships with major buyers. We conclude this study with a discussion <strong>of</strong><br />

implications and future research, specifically the demonstrated importance <strong>of</strong><br />

investigating asymmetric buyer-seller relationships.<br />

4 - Inventories, Incentives, and Channel Structure<br />

Sudheer Gupta, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Simon Fraser University, 8888<br />

University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada, sudheerg@sfu.ca<br />

A well-known result in channels literature states that competing manufacturers may<br />

have an incentive to decentralize downstream retailing to buffer from intense price<br />

competition when products are substitutable. We explore this effect in a dynamic<br />

setting where retailers can carry inventories forward. We show that retailers will<br />

always carry inventories as a credible source <strong>of</strong> competition for the manufacturers,<br />

even in the absence <strong>of</strong> traditional reasons for inventories. The presence <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />

inventories in dynamic intra-channel relations counters the benefits <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />

decentralization as a buffer against competition. We establish equilibrium outcomes<br />

for competing manufacturers selling differentiated products over two periods, and<br />

show how degree <strong>of</strong> product differentiation and the ease <strong>of</strong> carrying inventories<br />

forward affect prices, pr<strong>of</strong>its and equilibrium channel structure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!