03.07.2013 Views

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 - Investigating Salespeople Turnover in a Dynamic<br />

Structural Framework<br />

Steven Lu, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, CNR Codrington and Rose Streets,<br />

Sydney, Australia, steven.lu@sydney.edu.au, Ranjit Voola<br />

Understanding the salespeople’s turnover process is critical in effective sales force<br />

management. However, to our knowledge there are no studies structurally modelling<br />

salespeople turnover. We develop a dynamic model to capture salespeople’s turnover<br />

decisions. Not surprisingly, sales force turnover, has been an important area <strong>of</strong> study<br />

in marketing research. Various antecedents to sales force turnover have been<br />

examined. In a meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> sales force turnover research, Lucas, Parasuraman,<br />

Davis and Enis (1987) highlight that sales force turnover is very difficult to forecast<br />

and suggest that a more comprehensive understanding <strong>of</strong> turnovers will allow for<br />

understanding cost reduction, better recruiting, job design and general management<br />

practices. Our goal in this study is to provide an assessment <strong>of</strong> the antecedents <strong>of</strong><br />

sales force turnover through structural dynamically modelling sales force turnover.<br />

Through the dynamic modelling, we also intend to contribute to the theoretical<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> sales force turnover, by generating insights into the process <strong>of</strong><br />

learning about person-job fit, performance and demographics and its impact on sales<br />

force turnover. Over time, sales people will learn about cognitive skills and<br />

capabilities required to do the job, which influence who they feel about good fit.<br />

■ FC12<br />

Champions Center II<br />

Word <strong>of</strong> Mouth and Marketing Strategy<br />

Contributed Session<br />

Chair: Yogesh Joshi, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, 3301 Van<br />

Munching Hall, Robert H. Smith <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, College Park, MD,<br />

20814, United States <strong>of</strong> America, yjoshi@rhsmith.umd.edu<br />

1 - Impact <strong>of</strong> Company Announcements on the Evolution <strong>of</strong> Online<br />

Word-<strong>of</strong>-mouth<br />

Omer Topaloglu, PhD Student <strong>of</strong> Marketing, Texas Tech University,<br />

Rawls College <strong>of</strong> Business Texas Tech Unv, MS 2101, Lubbock, TX,<br />

United States <strong>of</strong> America, omer.topaloglu@ttu.edu, Piyush Kumar,<br />

Dennis Arnett, Mayukh Dass<br />

Marketing and strategy literature present several studies on the relationship between<br />

corporate communications and market response. However, the interaction between<br />

corporate communications and consumers’ reactions manifested as electronic word<strong>of</strong>-mouth<br />

(eWOM) remains to be studied. Although the importance <strong>of</strong> eWOM as an<br />

antecedent <strong>of</strong> product sales, product awareness, buying intentions, subsequent<br />

reviews, and reliability <strong>of</strong> retailers has been widely explored, how companies tailor<br />

their marketing strategies to influence eWOM continues to be a challenge. In this<br />

paper, we investigate the effects <strong>of</strong> company announcements on the dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

eWOM associated with a new product. Specifically, we examine how eWOM<br />

evolution in terms <strong>of</strong> its content, quantity, quality, and valence is affected by different<br />

types <strong>of</strong> announcements by the firms and their competitors. We draw implications<br />

from our results for managing the interaction between corporate communications<br />

and social media.<br />

2 - Antecedents and Consequences <strong>of</strong> Pre-release C2C Buzz Evolution:<br />

A Functional Analysis<br />

Guiyang Xiong, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Georgia, 148 Brooks<br />

Hall, Department <strong>of</strong> Marketing and Distribution, Athens, GA, 30606,<br />

United States <strong>of</strong> America, gyxiong@uga.edu, Sundar Bharadwaj<br />

This study focuses on the evolution pattern <strong>of</strong> online Customer-to-Customer (C2C)<br />

buzz over time prior to the launches <strong>of</strong> new products, or pre-release C2C buzz. Using<br />

functional data analysis method, we observe significant heterogeneity in pre-release<br />

C2C buzz evolution pattern across products. We also explore the underlying features<br />

and investigate the antecedents <strong>of</strong> the variability in pre-release C2C buzz evolution<br />

patterns, especially firm strategic behaviors such as Business-to-Business (B2B)<br />

relationships and advertising. Moreover, we demonstrate how pre-release C2C buzz<br />

evolution patterns influence new product success (sales and changes in firm stock<br />

market valuations upon new product introductions), as well as how this impact is<br />

complemented by traditional media and other firm controllable factors. The findings<br />

provide unique insights into how firms can strategically influence pre-release C2C<br />

buzz to enhance new product performance.<br />

3 - Underpromising and Overdelivering - Competitive Implications <strong>of</strong><br />

Word <strong>of</strong> Mouth<br />

Yogesh Joshi, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, 3301 Van<br />

Munching Hall, Robert H. Smith <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, College Park,<br />

MD, 20814, United States <strong>of</strong> America, yjoshi@rhsmith.umd.edu,<br />

Andrés Musalem<br />

Companies are routinely <strong>of</strong>fered the advice that when it comes to meeting customer<br />

expectations, they are better <strong>of</strong>f if they under-promise and over-deliver. By doing so,<br />

customers are delighted and spread positive word <strong>of</strong> mouth about the company. This<br />

argument, while sound at times, comes with two caveats. First, by under-promising,<br />

companies may actually discourage customers from initially trying out their product<br />

or service. Second, the benefit from delight may be moderated by degree to which<br />

MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011 FC13<br />

59<br />

subsequent customers value customer feedback vis-a-vis their own beliefs about the<br />

product or service in their purchase decision. In this paper, we explore whether and<br />

when should firms under-promise or over-promise their quality to their customers,<br />

when customers have imperfect information regarding such quality in the<br />

marketplace. We show that it is not always optimal for a firm to under-promise and<br />

over-deliver. Specifically, in a market with two equally matched competitors,<br />

underpromising can be sustained only if consumers sufficiently weigh both: i) their<br />

initial beliefs about the firm’s quality and ii) any word <strong>of</strong> mouth about the firm that is<br />

inconsistent with the initial quality promises. As these weights decrease, we find that<br />

no more than one firm can use an underpromising strategy and for sufficiently low<br />

weights both firms prefer to overpromise. Finally, as the true quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

competitors increases, smaller weights on initial beliefs and positive word <strong>of</strong> mouth<br />

are required to sustain an underpromising strategy.<br />

■ FC13<br />

Champions Center III<br />

Financial Decision Making<br />

Contributed Session<br />

Chair: Carlos Lourenco, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Rotterdam <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam,<br />

3000DR, Netherlands, carlosjslourenco@gmail.com<br />

1 - What You Know, What You Do or Who You Know? A Model <strong>of</strong><br />

Individual Investor Returns<br />

Thomas Gruca, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, University <strong>of</strong> Iowa,<br />

S356 John Pappajohn Bus Bldg, The University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Iowa City, IA,<br />

52242-1994, United States <strong>of</strong> America, thomas-gruca@uiowa.edu,<br />

Sheila Goins<br />

Our focus is the behavior <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors. Economic changes mean that<br />

individuals have to take more responsibility for saving and investing. Most prior<br />

research on investor behavior involved concerns pr<strong>of</strong>essionals (e.g. fund managers)<br />

or Wall Street analysts. A continuing stream <strong>of</strong> research suggests that social networks<br />

affect consumer decision making. The question examined in this study is: How do<br />

social ties affect behavior <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors? In addition to social ties, we<br />

examine the influences <strong>of</strong> a trader’s knowledge and market strategy in two electronic<br />

futures markets with different levels <strong>of</strong> uncertainty. Under low levels <strong>of</strong> uncertainty,<br />

individual forecast accuracy determines outcomes. As well, a trader can leverage the<br />

information reflected in market prices. Network structure and the accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

network information influence both intent to participate and actual market activity<br />

levels. Traders with large redundant networks had more accurate forecasts and traded<br />

more actively. However, social networks do not have a significant direct or indirect<br />

effect on outcomes. In markets with high levels <strong>of</strong> uncertainty, we find similar<br />

network effects on private knowledge and trading activity. However, market success<br />

was determined by an accurate knowledge rather than trading activity. Our unique<br />

dataset sheds light on the interplay <strong>of</strong> private information, market actions and social<br />

networks on the success <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors. Our findings imply that<br />

investor activity and knowledge is contingent upon accuracy <strong>of</strong> information in their<br />

network. This can prove hazardous to individual investors making investment<br />

decisions where their network informational accuracy can’t be know a priori.<br />

2 - Investing for Retirement: The Moderating Effect <strong>of</strong> Fund Assortment<br />

Size on the 1/N Heuristic<br />

Jeff Inman, Frey Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh,<br />

356 Mervis Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

jinman@katz.pitt.edu, Susan Broniarczyk, Mimi Morrin<br />

Does the number <strong>of</strong> funds <strong>of</strong>fered in defined contribution plans such as 401(k)’s<br />

affect how many funds people choose to invest in or how they spread their dollars<br />

across their chosen funds? In this research, we examine the tendency to engage in<br />

the 1/n heuristic – investing one’s dollars evenly across all available investment<br />

options (Benartzi and Thaler 2001). We decompose this heuristic into its two<br />

underlying behavioral dimensions, the tendency to invest in all available funds and<br />

the tendency to spread the invested dollars evenly across the funds. We argue that,<br />

because choosing from a larger fund assortment size is cognitively depleting,<br />

increasing the fund assortment size will decrease the tendency to invest in all<br />

available funds (the first 1/n dimension), but increase the tendency to spread one’s<br />

dollars evenly among the chosen alternatives (the second 1/n dimension). Our thesis<br />

is supported across three experiments as well as in actual investment data obtained<br />

from a large financial services firm for actual mutual fund choices by new investors in<br />

defined contribution plans. Specifically, we consistently find that <strong>of</strong>fering a larger<br />

fund assortment reduces the proportion <strong>of</strong> funds invested in but increases the<br />

tendency to spread one’s dollars more evenly among the chosen funds. Supporting<br />

our cognitive depletion argument, Study 1 shows that number <strong>of</strong> thoughts mediates<br />

this process, while Study 2 shows that time spent per fund chosen for investment<br />

mediates the process. Study 3 introduces a cognitive load condition, which attenuates<br />

the effects observed in the first two studies. Study 4 shows that the predicted effects<br />

obtain among actual investors in 401k plans using data for several thousand plan<br />

participants across hundreds <strong>of</strong> defined contribution plans.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!