Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3 - Investigating Salespeople Turnover in a Dynamic<br />
Structural Framework<br />
Steven Lu, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, CNR Codrington and Rose Streets,<br />
Sydney, Australia, steven.lu@sydney.edu.au, Ranjit Voola<br />
Understanding the salespeople’s turnover process is critical in effective sales force<br />
management. However, to our knowledge there are no studies structurally modelling<br />
salespeople turnover. We develop a dynamic model to capture salespeople’s turnover<br />
decisions. Not surprisingly, sales force turnover, has been an important area <strong>of</strong> study<br />
in marketing research. Various antecedents to sales force turnover have been<br />
examined. In a meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> sales force turnover research, Lucas, Parasuraman,<br />
Davis and Enis (1987) highlight that sales force turnover is very difficult to forecast<br />
and suggest that a more comprehensive understanding <strong>of</strong> turnovers will allow for<br />
understanding cost reduction, better recruiting, job design and general management<br />
practices. Our goal in this study is to provide an assessment <strong>of</strong> the antecedents <strong>of</strong><br />
sales force turnover through structural dynamically modelling sales force turnover.<br />
Through the dynamic modelling, we also intend to contribute to the theoretical<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> sales force turnover, by generating insights into the process <strong>of</strong><br />
learning about person-job fit, performance and demographics and its impact on sales<br />
force turnover. Over time, sales people will learn about cognitive skills and<br />
capabilities required to do the job, which influence who they feel about good fit.<br />
■ FC12<br />
Champions Center II<br />
Word <strong>of</strong> Mouth and Marketing Strategy<br />
Contributed Session<br />
Chair: Yogesh Joshi, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, 3301 Van<br />
Munching Hall, Robert H. Smith <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, College Park, MD,<br />
20814, United States <strong>of</strong> America, yjoshi@rhsmith.umd.edu<br />
1 - Impact <strong>of</strong> Company Announcements on the Evolution <strong>of</strong> Online<br />
Word-<strong>of</strong>-mouth<br />
Omer Topaloglu, PhD Student <strong>of</strong> Marketing, Texas Tech University,<br />
Rawls College <strong>of</strong> Business Texas Tech Unv, MS 2101, Lubbock, TX,<br />
United States <strong>of</strong> America, omer.topaloglu@ttu.edu, Piyush Kumar,<br />
Dennis Arnett, Mayukh Dass<br />
Marketing and strategy literature present several studies on the relationship between<br />
corporate communications and market response. However, the interaction between<br />
corporate communications and consumers’ reactions manifested as electronic word<strong>of</strong>-mouth<br />
(eWOM) remains to be studied. Although the importance <strong>of</strong> eWOM as an<br />
antecedent <strong>of</strong> product sales, product awareness, buying intentions, subsequent<br />
reviews, and reliability <strong>of</strong> retailers has been widely explored, how companies tailor<br />
their marketing strategies to influence eWOM continues to be a challenge. In this<br />
paper, we investigate the effects <strong>of</strong> company announcements on the dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />
eWOM associated with a new product. Specifically, we examine how eWOM<br />
evolution in terms <strong>of</strong> its content, quantity, quality, and valence is affected by different<br />
types <strong>of</strong> announcements by the firms and their competitors. We draw implications<br />
from our results for managing the interaction between corporate communications<br />
and social media.<br />
2 - Antecedents and Consequences <strong>of</strong> Pre-release C2C Buzz Evolution:<br />
A Functional Analysis<br />
Guiyang Xiong, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Georgia, 148 Brooks<br />
Hall, Department <strong>of</strong> Marketing and Distribution, Athens, GA, 30606,<br />
United States <strong>of</strong> America, gyxiong@uga.edu, Sundar Bharadwaj<br />
This study focuses on the evolution pattern <strong>of</strong> online Customer-to-Customer (C2C)<br />
buzz over time prior to the launches <strong>of</strong> new products, or pre-release C2C buzz. Using<br />
functional data analysis method, we observe significant heterogeneity in pre-release<br />
C2C buzz evolution pattern across products. We also explore the underlying features<br />
and investigate the antecedents <strong>of</strong> the variability in pre-release C2C buzz evolution<br />
patterns, especially firm strategic behaviors such as Business-to-Business (B2B)<br />
relationships and advertising. Moreover, we demonstrate how pre-release C2C buzz<br />
evolution patterns influence new product success (sales and changes in firm stock<br />
market valuations upon new product introductions), as well as how this impact is<br />
complemented by traditional media and other firm controllable factors. The findings<br />
provide unique insights into how firms can strategically influence pre-release C2C<br />
buzz to enhance new product performance.<br />
3 - Underpromising and Overdelivering - Competitive Implications <strong>of</strong><br />
Word <strong>of</strong> Mouth<br />
Yogesh Joshi, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, 3301 Van<br />
Munching Hall, Robert H. Smith <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, College Park,<br />
MD, 20814, United States <strong>of</strong> America, yjoshi@rhsmith.umd.edu,<br />
Andrés Musalem<br />
Companies are routinely <strong>of</strong>fered the advice that when it comes to meeting customer<br />
expectations, they are better <strong>of</strong>f if they under-promise and over-deliver. By doing so,<br />
customers are delighted and spread positive word <strong>of</strong> mouth about the company. This<br />
argument, while sound at times, comes with two caveats. First, by under-promising,<br />
companies may actually discourage customers from initially trying out their product<br />
or service. Second, the benefit from delight may be moderated by degree to which<br />
MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011 FC13<br />
59<br />
subsequent customers value customer feedback vis-a-vis their own beliefs about the<br />
product or service in their purchase decision. In this paper, we explore whether and<br />
when should firms under-promise or over-promise their quality to their customers,<br />
when customers have imperfect information regarding such quality in the<br />
marketplace. We show that it is not always optimal for a firm to under-promise and<br />
over-deliver. Specifically, in a market with two equally matched competitors,<br />
underpromising can be sustained only if consumers sufficiently weigh both: i) their<br />
initial beliefs about the firm’s quality and ii) any word <strong>of</strong> mouth about the firm that is<br />
inconsistent with the initial quality promises. As these weights decrease, we find that<br />
no more than one firm can use an underpromising strategy and for sufficiently low<br />
weights both firms prefer to overpromise. Finally, as the true quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
competitors increases, smaller weights on initial beliefs and positive word <strong>of</strong> mouth<br />
are required to sustain an underpromising strategy.<br />
■ FC13<br />
Champions Center III<br />
Financial Decision Making<br />
Contributed Session<br />
Chair: Carlos Lourenco, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Rotterdam <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam,<br />
3000DR, Netherlands, carlosjslourenco@gmail.com<br />
1 - What You Know, What You Do or Who You Know? A Model <strong>of</strong><br />
Individual Investor Returns<br />
Thomas Gruca, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, University <strong>of</strong> Iowa,<br />
S356 John Pappajohn Bus Bldg, The University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Iowa City, IA,<br />
52242-1994, United States <strong>of</strong> America, thomas-gruca@uiowa.edu,<br />
Sheila Goins<br />
Our focus is the behavior <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors. Economic changes mean that<br />
individuals have to take more responsibility for saving and investing. Most prior<br />
research on investor behavior involved concerns pr<strong>of</strong>essionals (e.g. fund managers)<br />
or Wall Street analysts. A continuing stream <strong>of</strong> research suggests that social networks<br />
affect consumer decision making. The question examined in this study is: How do<br />
social ties affect behavior <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors? In addition to social ties, we<br />
examine the influences <strong>of</strong> a trader’s knowledge and market strategy in two electronic<br />
futures markets with different levels <strong>of</strong> uncertainty. Under low levels <strong>of</strong> uncertainty,<br />
individual forecast accuracy determines outcomes. As well, a trader can leverage the<br />
information reflected in market prices. Network structure and the accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />
network information influence both intent to participate and actual market activity<br />
levels. Traders with large redundant networks had more accurate forecasts and traded<br />
more actively. However, social networks do not have a significant direct or indirect<br />
effect on outcomes. In markets with high levels <strong>of</strong> uncertainty, we find similar<br />
network effects on private knowledge and trading activity. However, market success<br />
was determined by an accurate knowledge rather than trading activity. Our unique<br />
dataset sheds light on the interplay <strong>of</strong> private information, market actions and social<br />
networks on the success <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors. Our findings imply that<br />
investor activity and knowledge is contingent upon accuracy <strong>of</strong> information in their<br />
network. This can prove hazardous to individual investors making investment<br />
decisions where their network informational accuracy can’t be know a priori.<br />
2 - Investing for Retirement: The Moderating Effect <strong>of</strong> Fund Assortment<br />
Size on the 1/N Heuristic<br />
Jeff Inman, Frey Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh,<br />
356 Mervis Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />
jinman@katz.pitt.edu, Susan Broniarczyk, Mimi Morrin<br />
Does the number <strong>of</strong> funds <strong>of</strong>fered in defined contribution plans such as 401(k)’s<br />
affect how many funds people choose to invest in or how they spread their dollars<br />
across their chosen funds? In this research, we examine the tendency to engage in<br />
the 1/n heuristic – investing one’s dollars evenly across all available investment<br />
options (Benartzi and Thaler 2001). We decompose this heuristic into its two<br />
underlying behavioral dimensions, the tendency to invest in all available funds and<br />
the tendency to spread the invested dollars evenly across the funds. We argue that,<br />
because choosing from a larger fund assortment size is cognitively depleting,<br />
increasing the fund assortment size will decrease the tendency to invest in all<br />
available funds (the first 1/n dimension), but increase the tendency to spread one’s<br />
dollars evenly among the chosen alternatives (the second 1/n dimension). Our thesis<br />
is supported across three experiments as well as in actual investment data obtained<br />
from a large financial services firm for actual mutual fund choices by new investors in<br />
defined contribution plans. Specifically, we consistently find that <strong>of</strong>fering a larger<br />
fund assortment reduces the proportion <strong>of</strong> funds invested in but increases the<br />
tendency to spread one’s dollars more evenly among the chosen funds. Supporting<br />
our cognitive depletion argument, Study 1 shows that number <strong>of</strong> thoughts mediates<br />
this process, while Study 2 shows that time spent per fund chosen for investment<br />
mediates the process. Study 3 introduces a cognitive load condition, which attenuates<br />
the effects observed in the first two studies. Study 4 shows that the predicted effects<br />
obtain among actual investors in 401k plans using data for several thousand plan<br />
participants across hundreds <strong>of</strong> defined contribution plans.