03.07.2013 Views

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 - Data or Structure? Using a Field Experiment to Assess the<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> Counterfactual Demand Predictive Performance<br />

Manuel Hermosilla, PhD Student, Kellogg <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Managment,<br />

Northwestern University, 2001 Sheridan Road, Room 474, Evanston,<br />

IL, 60208, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

m-hermosilla@kellogg.northwestern.edu, Yi Qian, Eric Anderson<br />

We evaluate the roles <strong>of</strong> microeconomic/statistical structure and experimental data as<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> counterfactual demand predictive performance. The specific<br />

structures under evaluation are those developed by Berry (1994) and Berry et al.<br />

(1995). Experimental demand data is obtained from a large-scale field experiment<br />

that specified several price conditions for various products <strong>of</strong> a retail category.<br />

Counterfactual demand scenarios arose in some <strong>of</strong> these conditions because<br />

experimental prices substantially departed from those observed in a subsample with<br />

non-experimental historical data. By re-estimating structural and structure-free<br />

econometric models with varying amounts <strong>of</strong> the experimental data, we are able to<br />

isolate the contribution <strong>of</strong> each source <strong>of</strong> identification on counterfactual demand<br />

predictive performance. Our results show that both experimental data and<br />

microeconomic/statistical assumptions (as given by the considered models), provide<br />

advantages in counterfactual demand prediction. These results are robust to different<br />

measures, and in general, suggest that the key driver <strong>of</strong> predictive performance in<br />

counterfactual demand scenarios is the quality <strong>of</strong> the data used for estimation.<br />

Results thus suggest that (i) if the goal is to generate predictions <strong>of</strong> counterfactual<br />

demand scenarios, it might not be worth the while to undergo the costly process <strong>of</strong><br />

specification and estimation <strong>of</strong> a structural econometric model <strong>of</strong> demand, and (ii) if<br />

the goal is to understand the fundamentals <strong>of</strong> consumers’ choice, parameter estimates<br />

<strong>of</strong> a structural demand model can be reliably used for counterfactual prediction.<br />

3 - Estimation <strong>of</strong> Willingness to Pay Intervals by Discrete<br />

Choice Experiments<br />

Christian Schlereth, Goethe University Frankfurt, Grueneburgplatz 1,<br />

Frankfurt, 60323, Germany, schlereth@wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de,<br />

Christine Eckert, Bernd Skiera<br />

Knowledge about consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) is essential for a pr<strong>of</strong>itmaximizing<br />

price management. This willingness to pay has always been regarded as a<br />

point estimate, typically as the price that makes the consumer indifferent between<br />

buying and not buying the product. In contrast, this paper uses discrete choice<br />

experiments and a scale adjusted latent class model to estimate willingness-to-pay as<br />

an interval. The mid value <strong>of</strong> this interval corresponds to the traditional WTP point<br />

estimate and depends on the deterministic utility, while the range <strong>of</strong> the interval is<br />

influenced by the price sensitivity as well as the error variance (scale) that determines<br />

the random utility for a product. This error variance, i.e. the degree <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in<br />

consumers’ choices has strong implications for firms competing in the market. Those<br />

firms with more fa-vorable products should target consumers with low scale (high<br />

certainty), while the other firms should target those with high scale (low certainty).<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> our empirical study demonstrate that such knowledge about individual<br />

intervals <strong>of</strong> willingness to pay enables better segmenting customers. The results<br />

further show that the sizes <strong>of</strong> the will-ingness-to-pay intervals can be large and that<br />

ignoring these sizes may lead to non-optimal pricing decisions.<br />

■ FC02<br />

Legends Ballroom II<br />

UGC-III (Content and Impact)<br />

Cluster: Internet and Interactive Marketing<br />

Invited Session<br />

Chair: Raji Srinivasan, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Austin,<br />

1 University Station, Austin, TX, 78712, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

Raji.Srinivasan@mccombs.utexas.edu<br />

1 - Bimodal Distribution <strong>of</strong> Emotional Content in Customer Reviews:<br />

Emotional Biases in Online Customer Reviews<br />

Wonjoon Kim, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, KAIST, Guseong-dong, Yuseonggu,<br />

Daejeon, 305701, Korea, Republic <strong>of</strong>, wonjoon.kim@kaist.ac.kr<br />

Word-<strong>of</strong>-mouth (WOM), most visibly encountered in the form <strong>of</strong> online customer<br />

reviews in recent times, has received considerable attention <strong>of</strong> late by academics and<br />

practitioners alike. While a number <strong>of</strong> studies have examined the phenomenon’s<br />

frequency and distribution patterns to understand its characteristics and the<br />

motivation behind it, WOM contents across its distribution have remained underexplored.<br />

To fill this important gap in the literature, we analyzed WOM contents<br />

using Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods, which are used to study the<br />

intersection <strong>of</strong> computers and human language. Using this approach, we find that<br />

more extreme reviews have a greater proportion <strong>of</strong> emotional content than less<br />

extreme reviews, revealing a bimodal distribution <strong>of</strong> emotional content as in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> WOM distribution; we refer to this as emotional bias. Second, we find that reviews<br />

have more positive emotional content toward positive extreme ratings than negative<br />

MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011 FC02<br />

53<br />

emotional content toward negative extreme ratings, falling into a J-shaped<br />

distribution (self-selection bias). Lastly, we find that uncertainty related to product<br />

quality before consumption is associated with more emotional words across different<br />

product categories (uncertainty bias). However, in this context the amount <strong>of</strong> positive<br />

emotional content is higher than that <strong>of</strong> negative content, suggesting a J-shaped<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> emotional content. Furthermore, we find that search goods are<br />

associated with the lowest amount <strong>of</strong> expressed emotion, followed by experience<br />

goods, and then credence goods. Our findings enhance our understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

motivation behind WOM and related consumer behavior in the context <strong>of</strong> product<br />

sales.<br />

2 - Ad Revenue and Content Commercialization: Evidence from Blogs<br />

Monic Sun, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Stanford University,<br />

518 Memorial Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

monic@stanford.edu, Feng Zhu<br />

Many scholars are concerned about the impact <strong>of</strong> ad-sponsored business models on<br />

content providers. They argue that content providers, when incentivized by ad<br />

revenue, are more likely to tailor their content to attract “eyeballs,” and as a result,<br />

popular content may be excessively supplied. We empirically test this prediction by<br />

taking advantage <strong>of</strong> the launch <strong>of</strong> an ad revenue-sharing program initiated by a<br />

major Chinese portal site in September 2007. Participating bloggers allow the site to<br />

run ads on their blogs and receive 50% <strong>of</strong> the revenue generated by these ads. After<br />

analyzing 4.4 million blog posts, we find that compared to nonparticipants, the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> popular content increases by about 13% on the participants’ blogs after<br />

the program takes effect. More than 50% <strong>of</strong> this increase can be attributed to topics<br />

shifting towards three domains: stock market, salacious content, and celebrities. We<br />

also find evidence that, relative to nonparticipants, the participants’ content quality<br />

increases after the program takes effect.<br />

3 - Does Advertising Affect Chatter? - Assessing the Dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

Advertising on Online Word-<strong>of</strong>-mouth<br />

Seshadri Tirunillai, University <strong>of</strong> Southern California, Los Angeles,<br />

CA, United States <strong>of</strong> America, tirunill@usc.edu, Gerard J. Tellis<br />

Despite the increased importance <strong>of</strong> consumer media, the factors influencing the<br />

User-Generated Content (UGC) have seen limited research. In this study, we<br />

investigate the effect <strong>of</strong> corporate advertising on UGC using a natural experiment in a<br />

time series setting. We seek to answer the following questions: 1) If there does exist a<br />

relation, can we establish the direction <strong>of</strong> causality? 2) Among the various metrics <strong>of</strong><br />

UGC, which metrics are influenced by advertising and how are they affected? 3)<br />

What are the dynamics <strong>of</strong> such a relationship in terms <strong>of</strong> growth, persistence and<br />

decays? We use big budget corporate advertising campaigns to assess the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

the campaign on the different metrics <strong>of</strong> UGC (e.g. overall volume, negative and<br />

positive UGC) <strong>of</strong> the target firm and the competitors. We try to assess the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

advertising on firms by assessing the differential impact on the UGC metrics. We also<br />

analyze the dynamics <strong>of</strong> advertisement on the metrics UGC using multivariate time<br />

series. We find that after the introduction <strong>of</strong> the advertising campaign, the chatter <strong>of</strong><br />

the target firm increased by about 27% relative to the control firms that did not<br />

undertake any major brand campaign during this period. While we find that the<br />

positive chatter increases markedly as compared to the synthetic control, there was<br />

no systematic decrease in negative chatter during the time period. There is also a<br />

spillover <strong>of</strong> advertising across firms in a market.<br />

4 - Social Influence in the Evolution <strong>of</strong> Online Ratings <strong>of</strong> Service Firms<br />

Raji Srinivasan, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Austin,<br />

1 University Station, Austin, TX, 78712, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

Raji.Srinivasan@mccombs.utexas.edu<br />

Online consumer review websites prominently display consumers’ online ratings <strong>of</strong><br />

service firms, which influence other consumers’ purchase decisions. Yet there are few<br />

insights on the factors influencing online ratings <strong>of</strong> service firms. The authors develop<br />

hypotheses <strong>of</strong> how other consumers’ online ratings <strong>of</strong> the service firm moderate the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> a reviewer’s service encounter characteristics – valence <strong>of</strong> the service<br />

encounter, occurrence <strong>of</strong> service failure, and service recovery effort – on the<br />

reviewer’s online rating <strong>of</strong> the service firm. They test the hypotheses using an ordered<br />

probit model with data from 7,499 online reviews <strong>of</strong> hotels in Boston and Honolulu<br />

between 2006 and 2010. The results support the hypotheses <strong>of</strong> the moderating effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> social influence on a reviewer’s online rating <strong>of</strong> the service firm. The authors<br />

decompose the effects <strong>of</strong> service encounter characteristics on online ratings <strong>of</strong> service<br />

firms into ‘service encounter’ and ‘social influence’ components, a novel contribution<br />

to the marketing literature in services. From a managerial perspective, when a service<br />

failure occurs in a service firm with a high online rating, the decrease in the firm’s<br />

long-term rating is more than when it has a low online rating. The opposite is true<br />

when a service recovery effort is attempted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!