03.07.2013 Views

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 - Social Ties and User Generated Content: Evidence from an Online<br />

Social Network<br />

Harikesh Nair, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Stanford University,<br />

518 Memorial Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, Uganda,<br />

harikesh.nair@stanford.edu, Reto H<strong>of</strong>stetter, Scott Shriver<br />

We use variation in wind speeds at surfing locations in Switzerland as exogenous<br />

shifters <strong>of</strong> usersÌpropensity to post content about their surfing activity onto an online<br />

social network. We exploit this variation to test whether users social ties on the<br />

network have a causal effect on their content generation, and whether content<br />

generation in turn has a causal effect on the users’ ability to form social ties.<br />

Economically significant causal effects <strong>of</strong> this kind can produce positive feedback that<br />

generate multiplier effects to interventions that subsidize tie formation. We argue<br />

these interventions can therefore be the basis <strong>of</strong> a strategy by the from to indirectly<br />

facilitate content generation on the site. The exogenous variation provided by wind<br />

speeds enable us to measure this feedback empirically and to assess the return on<br />

investment from such policies. We use a detailed dataset from an online social<br />

network that comprises the complete history <strong>of</strong> social tie formation and content<br />

generation on the site. The richness <strong>of</strong> the data enable us to control for several<br />

spurious confounds that have typically plagued empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> social<br />

interactions. Our results show evidence <strong>of</strong> significant positive feedback in user<br />

content generation. We discuss the implications <strong>of</strong> the estimates for the management<br />

<strong>of</strong> the content and the growth <strong>of</strong> the network. Finally, we also provide bounds for<br />

robust identification <strong>of</strong> causal social effects under weak identification conditions.<br />

■ FD14<br />

Champions Center VI<br />

Marketing Strategy I: General<br />

Contributed Session<br />

Chair: Neil Bendle, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Ivey<br />

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, 1151 Richmond Street N, London, ON, N6A 3K7,<br />

Canada, nbendle@ivey.uwo.ca<br />

1 - Does Market Potential Always Attract New Market Entry?<br />

A Contingency View<br />

Namwoon Kim, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Hong Kong Polytechnic University,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Management and Marketing, Hung Hom, Kowloon,<br />

Hong Kong, Hong Kong - PRC, msnam@polyu.edu.hk, Ge Zhan,<br />

Sungwook Min<br />

Market potential, defined as the anticipated industry sales/customer population in the<br />

marketplace, has long been viewed in the literature as being related to market entry<br />

motivation (Fuentelsaz and Gomez 2006; Pennings 1982). While numerous findings<br />

identify market potential as the main incentive driving firms’ decisions to enter new<br />

markets (e.g., Baum and Korn 1996; Swaminathan 1998; Damar 2009), more than a<br />

few studies report a weak or even negative impact <strong>of</strong> market potential on such<br />

decisions (e.g., Bronnenberg and Mela 2004; Chesbrough 2003). In this regard, the<br />

emerging literature notes that entry into a new market is a complicated and multifaceted<br />

event that may be more influenced by other contextual factors such as<br />

industry background and the firm’s industry experience, as well as choice <strong>of</strong> targetmarket<br />

strategy (niche versus mass marketing). Based on a theoretical and integrative<br />

review <strong>of</strong> the existing literature on the relationship between market potential and<br />

market entry, this study provides a contingency framework to explain the conditions<br />

that strengthen or weaken this relationship. Using 187 parameter estimates from 38<br />

previous studies, our meta-analytic regression models have validated significant<br />

moderating effects for the market potential – market entry relationship. The<br />

moderating contexts are whether: (1) the new market is categorized as a high-tech or<br />

non-high-tech industry; (2) the entry is made by an established industry-incumbent<br />

or by a start-up; (3) the new market is a new-product market for the firm or a new<br />

geographic market; and (4) the new market entry targets a niche market or a mass<br />

market.<br />

2 - Repositioning via Abstraction Using Categorical Data<br />

Jonathan Lee, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, California State<br />

University-Long Beach, CBA 351 Dept <strong>of</strong> Marketing, 1250 Bellflower<br />

Blvd, Long Beach, CA, 90840-8501,<br />

United States <strong>of</strong> America, jlee6@csulb.edu, Heungsun Hwang<br />

Positioning is an essential strategic decision that represents a unique challenge for<br />

many marketers. While previous empirical models for positioning focus primarily on<br />

product features/attributes, we propose an abstraction framework (attributes-benefitsvalues)<br />

for the repositioning problem, arguing that consumer benefits and values can<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer more effective strategic options compared to an attribute-based perspective. We<br />

present a simultaneous two-way clustering approach using a mixture <strong>of</strong> Bayesian<br />

multiple correspondence analysis for repositioning to account for cluster-level<br />

MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011 FD14<br />

69<br />

heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> both consumers and variable categories using categorical data. The<br />

main objective is to obtain a positioning map that also accounts for the heterogeneity<br />

in consumer perceptions by identifying joint clusters, each consisting <strong>of</strong> a distinct<br />

subset <strong>of</strong> consumers and variable categories. A comprehensive view <strong>of</strong> repositioning<br />

through a joint mapping <strong>of</strong> consumers and attribute categories at each abstraction<br />

level adds row-dimension projections. Thus, repositioning strategy can be evaluated<br />

based on consumer demographic and/or psychographic characteristics in addition to<br />

attribute-level changes. We illustrate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the proposed theoretical<br />

framework and empirical model with consumer panel data for mid-sized sedan<br />

automobiles.<br />

3 - Business is in My Blood: Do Family Firms Outperform Non-family<br />

Firms During Economic Recessions?<br />

Saim Kashmiri, PhD Candidate, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Austin,<br />

1 University Station B6200, Austin, TX, 78712, United States <strong>of</strong><br />

America, saim.kashmiri@phd.mccombs.utexas.edu, Vijay Mahajan<br />

Family firms – firms owned and/or managed by founders or their families – play a<br />

critical role in the U.S. economy, making up about 35 percent <strong>of</strong> firms listed on the<br />

S&P 500 or Fortune 500 indices and contributing about 65 percent to the U.S. GDP.<br />

This research explores whether family firms exhibit unique strategic behavior during<br />

economic recessions and whether this behavior in turn helps them outperform nonfamily<br />

firms. Findings based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 428 U.S. publicly listed firms, over seven<br />

U.S. recessions between the years 1970 and 2008, reveals that family firms<br />

consistently outperform non-family firms during recessions. This superior<br />

performance is partially driven by founding families’ longer horizons while investing<br />

in such market-based assets as brand capital, social capital and human capital. Family<br />

firms do not decrease advertising as much as non-family firms do during recessions,<br />

thereby exhibiting higher levels <strong>of</strong> advertising intensity. Family firms also get<br />

involved in fewer social and employee-related unethical actions. Furthermore, family<br />

firms’ lower financial leverage helps minimize bankruptcy threat, also boosting these<br />

firms’ performance during recessions. These results underscore the benefits <strong>of</strong> a<br />

maintaining a conservative capital structure, and making consistent investments in<br />

market-based assets. These results also add to the scant family-firm literature,<br />

demonstrating family firm ownership to be an effective organizational structure<br />

during recessions.<br />

4 - Are Your Customers Crazy?<br />

Neil Bendle, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario,<br />

Ivey <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, 1151 Richmond Street N, London, ON, N6A<br />

3K7, Canada, nbendle@ivey.uwo.ca<br />

Contrary to Drucker’s (2007) advice marketing has enthusiastically embraced<br />

irrationality (Godin 2009, Cusick 2009). Writers draw upon behavioral economics<br />

(Kahneman 1994, Ariely 2008, 2010) where academics argue persuasively against<br />

Homo Economicus. Shugan (2006) however notes that conflating Homo Economicus<br />

- “adept optimizers” with “perfect foresight” who “never tire” - with rational is a<br />

marketing ploy by certain economists. Homo Economicus is but one, rather limited,<br />

view <strong>of</strong> rationality (Binmore 2009). Marketers can question the premise that Homo<br />

Economicus equals rational. Irrational is a pejorative term for customers while Homo<br />

Economicus diminishes our discipline by implying that marketing to “rational”<br />

customers is pointless. Furthermore given it is a reaction to the confused notion <strong>of</strong><br />

Homo Economicus irrational is itself ill defined. Instead <strong>of</strong> adopting Homo<br />

Economicus or embracing irrationality I recommend marketers articulate their own<br />

view <strong>of</strong> consumer rationality accepting consumers have, sometimes surprising,<br />

reasons for their actions. A marketer’s view <strong>of</strong> consumer rationality should answer<br />

simple questions such as: Are mistakes irrational? Choices based upon social<br />

preferences? I examine the connection between rationality assumptions and<br />

marketing strategy to show that a view <strong>of</strong> rationality should be the basis <strong>of</strong> a<br />

behavioral marketing strategy. For instance if needs are inherently unpredictable<br />

seeking to find and satisfy consumers’ current and future needs – a central pillar <strong>of</strong><br />

market orientation (Kohli & Jaworski 1990) – becomes a futile endeavor. Similarly<br />

advertising (including informative advertising) is pointless for those who accept<br />

Homo Economicus. A marketer’s conception <strong>of</strong> customer rationality is critical to<br />

determining marketing strategy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!