Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 - Social Ties and User Generated Content: Evidence from an Online<br />
Social Network<br />
Harikesh Nair, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Stanford University,<br />
518 Memorial Way, Stanford, CA, 94305, Uganda,<br />
harikesh.nair@stanford.edu, Reto H<strong>of</strong>stetter, Scott Shriver<br />
We use variation in wind speeds at surfing locations in Switzerland as exogenous<br />
shifters <strong>of</strong> usersÌpropensity to post content about their surfing activity onto an online<br />
social network. We exploit this variation to test whether users social ties on the<br />
network have a causal effect on their content generation, and whether content<br />
generation in turn has a causal effect on the users’ ability to form social ties.<br />
Economically significant causal effects <strong>of</strong> this kind can produce positive feedback that<br />
generate multiplier effects to interventions that subsidize tie formation. We argue<br />
these interventions can therefore be the basis <strong>of</strong> a strategy by the from to indirectly<br />
facilitate content generation on the site. The exogenous variation provided by wind<br />
speeds enable us to measure this feedback empirically and to assess the return on<br />
investment from such policies. We use a detailed dataset from an online social<br />
network that comprises the complete history <strong>of</strong> social tie formation and content<br />
generation on the site. The richness <strong>of</strong> the data enable us to control for several<br />
spurious confounds that have typically plagued empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> social<br />
interactions. Our results show evidence <strong>of</strong> significant positive feedback in user<br />
content generation. We discuss the implications <strong>of</strong> the estimates for the management<br />
<strong>of</strong> the content and the growth <strong>of</strong> the network. Finally, we also provide bounds for<br />
robust identification <strong>of</strong> causal social effects under weak identification conditions.<br />
■ FD14<br />
Champions Center VI<br />
Marketing Strategy I: General<br />
Contributed Session<br />
Chair: Neil Bendle, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Ivey<br />
<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, 1151 Richmond Street N, London, ON, N6A 3K7,<br />
Canada, nbendle@ivey.uwo.ca<br />
1 - Does Market Potential Always Attract New Market Entry?<br />
A Contingency View<br />
Namwoon Kim, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Hong Kong Polytechnic University,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Management and Marketing, Hung Hom, Kowloon,<br />
Hong Kong, Hong Kong - PRC, msnam@polyu.edu.hk, Ge Zhan,<br />
Sungwook Min<br />
Market potential, defined as the anticipated industry sales/customer population in the<br />
marketplace, has long been viewed in the literature as being related to market entry<br />
motivation (Fuentelsaz and Gomez 2006; Pennings 1982). While numerous findings<br />
identify market potential as the main incentive driving firms’ decisions to enter new<br />
markets (e.g., Baum and Korn 1996; Swaminathan 1998; Damar 2009), more than a<br />
few studies report a weak or even negative impact <strong>of</strong> market potential on such<br />
decisions (e.g., Bronnenberg and Mela 2004; Chesbrough 2003). In this regard, the<br />
emerging literature notes that entry into a new market is a complicated and multifaceted<br />
event that may be more influenced by other contextual factors such as<br />
industry background and the firm’s industry experience, as well as choice <strong>of</strong> targetmarket<br />
strategy (niche versus mass marketing). Based on a theoretical and integrative<br />
review <strong>of</strong> the existing literature on the relationship between market potential and<br />
market entry, this study provides a contingency framework to explain the conditions<br />
that strengthen or weaken this relationship. Using 187 parameter estimates from 38<br />
previous studies, our meta-analytic regression models have validated significant<br />
moderating effects for the market potential – market entry relationship. The<br />
moderating contexts are whether: (1) the new market is categorized as a high-tech or<br />
non-high-tech industry; (2) the entry is made by an established industry-incumbent<br />
or by a start-up; (3) the new market is a new-product market for the firm or a new<br />
geographic market; and (4) the new market entry targets a niche market or a mass<br />
market.<br />
2 - Repositioning via Abstraction Using Categorical Data<br />
Jonathan Lee, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, California State<br />
University-Long Beach, CBA 351 Dept <strong>of</strong> Marketing, 1250 Bellflower<br />
Blvd, Long Beach, CA, 90840-8501,<br />
United States <strong>of</strong> America, jlee6@csulb.edu, Heungsun Hwang<br />
Positioning is an essential strategic decision that represents a unique challenge for<br />
many marketers. While previous empirical models for positioning focus primarily on<br />
product features/attributes, we propose an abstraction framework (attributes-benefitsvalues)<br />
for the repositioning problem, arguing that consumer benefits and values can<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer more effective strategic options compared to an attribute-based perspective. We<br />
present a simultaneous two-way clustering approach using a mixture <strong>of</strong> Bayesian<br />
multiple correspondence analysis for repositioning to account for cluster-level<br />
MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011 FD14<br />
69<br />
heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> both consumers and variable categories using categorical data. The<br />
main objective is to obtain a positioning map that also accounts for the heterogeneity<br />
in consumer perceptions by identifying joint clusters, each consisting <strong>of</strong> a distinct<br />
subset <strong>of</strong> consumers and variable categories. A comprehensive view <strong>of</strong> repositioning<br />
through a joint mapping <strong>of</strong> consumers and attribute categories at each abstraction<br />
level adds row-dimension projections. Thus, repositioning strategy can be evaluated<br />
based on consumer demographic and/or psychographic characteristics in addition to<br />
attribute-level changes. We illustrate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the proposed theoretical<br />
framework and empirical model with consumer panel data for mid-sized sedan<br />
automobiles.<br />
3 - Business is in My Blood: Do Family Firms Outperform Non-family<br />
Firms During Economic Recessions?<br />
Saim Kashmiri, PhD Candidate, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Austin,<br />
1 University Station B6200, Austin, TX, 78712, United States <strong>of</strong><br />
America, saim.kashmiri@phd.mccombs.utexas.edu, Vijay Mahajan<br />
Family firms – firms owned and/or managed by founders or their families – play a<br />
critical role in the U.S. economy, making up about 35 percent <strong>of</strong> firms listed on the<br />
S&P 500 or Fortune 500 indices and contributing about 65 percent to the U.S. GDP.<br />
This research explores whether family firms exhibit unique strategic behavior during<br />
economic recessions and whether this behavior in turn helps them outperform nonfamily<br />
firms. Findings based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 428 U.S. publicly listed firms, over seven<br />
U.S. recessions between the years 1970 and 2008, reveals that family firms<br />
consistently outperform non-family firms during recessions. This superior<br />
performance is partially driven by founding families’ longer horizons while investing<br />
in such market-based assets as brand capital, social capital and human capital. Family<br />
firms do not decrease advertising as much as non-family firms do during recessions,<br />
thereby exhibiting higher levels <strong>of</strong> advertising intensity. Family firms also get<br />
involved in fewer social and employee-related unethical actions. Furthermore, family<br />
firms’ lower financial leverage helps minimize bankruptcy threat, also boosting these<br />
firms’ performance during recessions. These results underscore the benefits <strong>of</strong> a<br />
maintaining a conservative capital structure, and making consistent investments in<br />
market-based assets. These results also add to the scant family-firm literature,<br />
demonstrating family firm ownership to be an effective organizational structure<br />
during recessions.<br />
4 - Are Your Customers Crazy?<br />
Neil Bendle, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario,<br />
Ivey <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, 1151 Richmond Street N, London, ON, N6A<br />
3K7, Canada, nbendle@ivey.uwo.ca<br />
Contrary to Drucker’s (2007) advice marketing has enthusiastically embraced<br />
irrationality (Godin 2009, Cusick 2009). Writers draw upon behavioral economics<br />
(Kahneman 1994, Ariely 2008, 2010) where academics argue persuasively against<br />
Homo Economicus. Shugan (2006) however notes that conflating Homo Economicus<br />
- “adept optimizers” with “perfect foresight” who “never tire” - with rational is a<br />
marketing ploy by certain economists. Homo Economicus is but one, rather limited,<br />
view <strong>of</strong> rationality (Binmore 2009). Marketers can question the premise that Homo<br />
Economicus equals rational. Irrational is a pejorative term for customers while Homo<br />
Economicus diminishes our discipline by implying that marketing to “rational”<br />
customers is pointless. Furthermore given it is a reaction to the confused notion <strong>of</strong><br />
Homo Economicus irrational is itself ill defined. Instead <strong>of</strong> adopting Homo<br />
Economicus or embracing irrationality I recommend marketers articulate their own<br />
view <strong>of</strong> consumer rationality accepting consumers have, sometimes surprising,<br />
reasons for their actions. A marketer’s view <strong>of</strong> consumer rationality should answer<br />
simple questions such as: Are mistakes irrational? Choices based upon social<br />
preferences? I examine the connection between rationality assumptions and<br />
marketing strategy to show that a view <strong>of</strong> rationality should be the basis <strong>of</strong> a<br />
behavioral marketing strategy. For instance if needs are inherently unpredictable<br />
seeking to find and satisfy consumers’ current and future needs – a central pillar <strong>of</strong><br />
market orientation (Kohli & Jaworski 1990) – becomes a futile endeavor. Similarly<br />
advertising (including informative advertising) is pointless for those who accept<br />
Homo Economicus. A marketer’s conception <strong>of</strong> customer rationality is critical to<br />
determining marketing strategy.