03.07.2013 Views

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SA14 MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011<br />

■ SA14<br />

Champions Center VI<br />

Marketing Strategy II: Firm Performance<br />

Contributed Session<br />

Chair: Soumya Sarkar, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Calcutta, D H<br />

Road, Joka, Kolkata, 700104, India, soumya07@iimcal.ac.in<br />

1 - Various Strategic Orientations: Theoretical Comparison, Construct<br />

Refinement and Empirical Analyses<br />

Christian Hoops, Research Associate, TU Dortmund University,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Marketing, Vogelpothsweg 87, Dortmund, Germany,<br />

christian.hoops@tu-dortmund.de, Michael Bücker<br />

Many researchers argue that market, entrepreneurial and learning orientation are the<br />

three major strategic orientations which affect organizational performance (Hurley/<br />

Hult 1998, Lumpkin/ Dess 1996). However, only a few studies have investigated the<br />

antecedents, moderators and consequences <strong>of</strong> interaction orientation. This study fills<br />

the gap and compares various orientations with each other. According to Ramani/<br />

Kumar (2008), interaction orientation reflects the ability <strong>of</strong> a company to interact<br />

with the individual customer and to gather information from successful interactions.<br />

The authors identify four dimensions <strong>of</strong> the construct: customer concept, interaction<br />

response capacity, customer empowerment and customer value management.<br />

Exploratory depth interviews concluded that there is another sub-construct<br />

conceptualized as the understanding <strong>of</strong> the customer’s problem. Our factor analysis<br />

shows that indeed a fifth dimension exists. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> all verified and many new antecedents <strong>of</strong> interaction orientation,<br />

categorized into seven groups. Different regression analyses show that the<br />

organizational culture has the greatest impact on this orientation. The first notable<br />

finding is that B2B firms exhibit a greater degree <strong>of</strong> interaction orientation than B2C<br />

firms. Ramani and Kumar hypothesized that in their study. We show that there are<br />

B2C industries such as financial services, whose companies also have a greater<br />

interaction orientation. This could be the reason why the authors could not prove<br />

their hypothesis. Finally, this study examines the influence <strong>of</strong> strategic orientations<br />

on organizational performances such as product innovation or effectiveness and<br />

rejects synergetic effects between interaction and market orientation.<br />

2 - Effect <strong>of</strong> Advertising Capital and R&D Capital on Sales Growth, Pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

Growth and Market Value Growth<br />

Gautham Vadakkepatt, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Central<br />

Florida, Department <strong>of</strong> Marketing, College <strong>of</strong> Business Administration,<br />

Orlando, FL, 32816, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

gvadakkepatt@bus.ucf.edu, Venkatesh Shankar, Rajan Varadarajan<br />

There is mounting pressure on firms to exhibit organic (due to internal efforts)<br />

growth in sales, pr<strong>of</strong>it, and market value. Unfortunately, there is a limited<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the drivers <strong>of</strong> organic growth. In this research, we examine the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> advertising capital and R&D capital on sales growth, pr<strong>of</strong>it growth, and<br />

market value growth. We also examine how interactions between these two strategic<br />

variables and their interactions with environmental contingency factors <strong>of</strong> dynamism,<br />

munificence, and complexity impact these performance measures. Using dynamic<br />

panel data analysis <strong>of</strong> 185 firms over an eight-year period (2000-2007), we uncover a<br />

nuanced understanding <strong>of</strong> how advertising capital and R&D capital affect firm<br />

growth. Our results show that both R&D capital and advertising capital directly affect<br />

sales growth, but neither has a direct impact on pr<strong>of</strong>it growth. Furthermore, R&D<br />

capital has a direct impact on market value growth. We also find that while the<br />

interaction <strong>of</strong> advertising capital and R&D capital does not directly affect sales growth<br />

or market value growth, it has a positive direct impact on pr<strong>of</strong>it growth. Finally, we<br />

find that environmental contingencies matter. For instance, environmental dynamism<br />

negatively (positively) moderates the relationship between R&D (advertising) capital<br />

and sales growth.<br />

3 - Influence <strong>of</strong> Market Orientation on Corporate Brand Performance:<br />

Evidences from Indian B2B Firms<br />

Soumya Sarkar, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Calcutta,<br />

D H Road, Joka, Kolkata, 700104, India, soumya07@iimcal.ac.in,<br />

Prashant Mishra<br />

Organizational buyers perceive corporate brands, radiating from the firms’ culture,<br />

value propositions, and stakeholder relations, as specific cues for information,<br />

promises, and quality. Effectively managing the brands acquires a strategic dimension<br />

since it leads to a sustainable competitive advantage - brand equity. It is an indicator<br />

<strong>of</strong> the performance <strong>of</strong> the brand, and in turn, <strong>of</strong> the firm performance. Studies have<br />

revealed positive correlation <strong>of</strong> market orientation with both financial and marketbased<br />

performance parameters, but have not contemplated corporate brand<br />

performance as an outcome <strong>of</strong> market orientation. The absence <strong>of</strong> corporate brand<br />

performance is a fundamental lacuna in market orientation - performance<br />

relationship literature. Also not much research has happened on emerging economy<br />

firms, their adoption <strong>of</strong> market orientation, and its impact on firm performance. This<br />

study, still in its working stages, is situated in those above-mentioned hiatuses to<br />

study the impact market orientation creates on corporate brand performance <strong>of</strong><br />

business-to-business firms. This is its prime contribution to literature. The other<br />

noteworthy contribution it makes emanates from the methodology. Our distinct<br />

research design stands out from the common practice <strong>of</strong> acquiring judgmental<br />

performance data from the respondents to market orientation instruments. Instead<br />

we cover both ends <strong>of</strong> individual B2B marketer-customer dyads. The personnel in<br />

strategic marketing positions <strong>of</strong> selling firms provide the market orientation data. At<br />

the other end, purchasers/users from the buyer organisations indicate the perceived<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> the marketer brands, assessing the firm performance.<br />

78<br />

■ SA15<br />

Champions Center V<br />

CRM VII: Customer Equity<br />

Contributed Session<br />

Chair: Anita Basalingappa, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Mudra Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Communications (MICA), Shela, Ahmedabad, 380058, India,<br />

anitab55@gmail.com<br />

1 - The Formation <strong>of</strong> Impulse Buying: A Perspective on Self-control<br />

Failure <strong>of</strong> Consumer Behavior in CRM<br />

Kok Wei Khong, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University <strong>of</strong> Nottingham<br />

Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, 43500 Semenyih, Selangor Darul<br />

Ehsan, Malaysia, khong.kokwei@nottingham.edu.my, Hui-I Yao<br />

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) has become the principal modern<br />

marketing approach in both research and practice. One <strong>of</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> CRM is to<br />

manage customer relationships proactively in the long run. However, evidence shows<br />

that impulse buying is a hefty chuck <strong>of</strong> spending. This study reviews the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

impulse buying in consumer behavior. Three major ingredients, standards, a<br />

monitoring process, and the capability to modify one’s behavior, contribute to selfcontrol<br />

failure, which leads to impulse buying that probably generates purchase<br />

regret as well as harming a firm’s reputation. Implications for CRM <strong>of</strong> insights into<br />

impulse buying are discussed.<br />

2 - Monetizing UGC: A Hybrid Content Approach<br />

Theodoros Evgeniou, INSEAD, Blvd de Constance, Fontainebleau,<br />

77300, France, theodoros.evgeniou@insead.edu, Kaifu Zhang,<br />

Paddy Padmanabhan, Inyoung Chae<br />

The monetization <strong>of</strong> User-Generated Content (UGC) continues to be a challenge for<br />

many websites. Many advertisers are hesitant to embrace UGC-based advertising<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the large uncertainty about content quality. In this paper, we investigate<br />

the emergent Hybrid Content Strategy, wherein a firm hosts both UGC and<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional-Generated Content (PGC). We argue that the firm can explore the<br />

synergy between two types <strong>of</strong> content in order to better monetize both. For example,<br />

the firm can utilize UGC mainly for consumer retention or mainly for consumer<br />

acquisition, while generating advertising revenue from PGC - or vice versa. The firm<br />

can in general shift customers between UGC to PGC. Data from a large portal that has<br />

both PGC and UGC are used. We also discuss how a firm should balance its UGC and<br />

PGC audiences to optimize acquisition, retention, and revenue generation.<br />

3 - Competitiveness <strong>of</strong> Customer Relationship Management:<br />

Does Pr<strong>of</strong>itability Really Matter?<br />

Tae Ho Song, Visiting Researcher, UCLA Anderson <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Management, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, 90095,<br />

United States <strong>of</strong> America, ducktwo@korea.com, Sang Yong Kim<br />

Although the vast majority <strong>of</strong> researchers and practitioners in marketing supports<br />

that long-term performance orientation such as customer relationship management<br />

has been regarded as the better strategy than short-term performance orientation,<br />

some have raised the doubts about optimality <strong>of</strong> customer relationship management<br />

in the competitive environment (e.g. , Boulding et al 2005; Shugan 2005; Villanueva<br />

et al 2007; Musalem and Joshi 2009). In this research, we investigated the source <strong>of</strong><br />

competitiveness <strong>of</strong> customer relationship management strategy. We set up the<br />

competitive market structure between customer equity maximization strategy (for<br />

customer relationship management) and short-term pr<strong>of</strong>it maximization (for noncustomer<br />

relationship management), and did the game theoretical analysis using<br />

simulation methods. The results show the long-term pr<strong>of</strong>it when both <strong>of</strong> two<br />

competing firms choose the strategy <strong>of</strong> short-term pr<strong>of</strong>it maximization can be greater<br />

than when both choose the customer equity maximization strategy in the equilibrium<br />

status. Interestingly, it is inconsistent with the conventional wisdom. With the<br />

different standpoint <strong>of</strong> view, our results also mean that the customer equity<br />

maximization is better risk-aversive strategy than short-term pr<strong>of</strong>it maximization<br />

since our results imply that the short-term pr<strong>of</strong>it maximization is the pay<strong>of</strong>fdominant<br />

equilibrium and the customer equity maximization is the risk-dominant<br />

equilibrium. Thus, we propose the long-term performance orientation such as the<br />

strategies <strong>of</strong> customer relationship management or customer equity maximization is<br />

the strategy for avoiding the risk and uncertainty caused by market competition<br />

rather than the strategy for maximizing the long-term performance itself.<br />

4 - Differential Influences <strong>of</strong> Market Structures on Cognition and Affect<br />

Anita Basalingappa, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Mudra Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Communications (MICA), Shela, Ahmedabad, 380058, India,<br />

anitab55@gmail.com, M. S. Subhas<br />

This paper explores the influences <strong>of</strong> market structure on Cognition and Affect. This<br />

has been done keeping in mind the generalizations that can be applied while<br />

developing customer acquisition and customer retention efforts for any firm in a<br />

particular market structure. The questions addressed in this paper are: Can we<br />

generalize certain kind <strong>of</strong> consumer attitude across firms in a particular market<br />

structure? Does market structure have an influence over consumer attitude? The<br />

paper limits its scope to cognition and affect stages <strong>of</strong> the Tri-component model.<br />

Three product markets in the Transportation sector in India were chosen to make<br />

possible the comparison <strong>of</strong> the three market structures from a common base – which<br />

is the transportation sector. (Imperfect monopoly – Railways; Oligopolistic market –<br />

Airways; and Monopolistic market – Road transport).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!