03.07.2013 Views

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FD02<br />

■ FD02<br />

Legends Ballroom II<br />

UGC-IV (Content and Impact)<br />

Cluster: Internet and Interactive Marketing<br />

Invited Session<br />

Chair: Janghyuk Lee, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Korea University, Business<br />

<strong>School</strong>, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136701, Korea, Republic <strong>of</strong>,<br />

janglee@korea.ac.kr<br />

1 - Understanding the Dynamic Process <strong>of</strong> Online WOM: A HB Choice<br />

Model for Online Response Behavior<br />

Luping Sun, Doctoral Student <strong>of</strong> Marketing, Peking University,<br />

Guanghua <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management, Beijing, China,<br />

sunluping@gsm.pku.edu.cn, Ping Wang, Meng Su<br />

Online word-<strong>of</strong>-mouth (WOM) plays a critical role in reshaping consumers’ attitudes<br />

toward new products. Consumers consult online reviews to obtain others’ opinions <strong>of</strong><br />

the new product, and then form their own ones. In a standard review, one main<br />

message initiates the communication, followed by responses from many reviewers to<br />

express their attitudes. This dynamic interaction process may change consumers’<br />

original attitudes, and should be thoroughly studied to understand the dynamics. This<br />

research investigates how prior responses in a review and the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

current reviewer per se influence his or her attitude toward the new product. We<br />

collected 41 new product reviews from various websites and kept the first 40 to 50<br />

responses for each review, which resulted in 1824 observations (i.e., responses) in<br />

total. In order to capture the main message heterogeneity, we apply a Hierarchical<br />

Bayesian Ordinal Choice Model with MCMC method to estimate the parameters. We<br />

find that prior responses and the current reviewer’ characteristics significantly<br />

influence his or her attitude to the product, and the impacts <strong>of</strong> the two differ greatly<br />

across main messages. Another intriguing finding is that positive responses matter<br />

more than negative ones in reshaping the following reviewers’ attitude. Finally,<br />

theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.<br />

2 - User-generated Content in News Media<br />

T. Pinar Yildirim, University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, Katz <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business,<br />

249 Mervis Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

tyildirim@katz.pitt.edu, Esther Gal-Or, Tansev Geylani<br />

In this study, we investigate a newspaper’s decision to expand its product line by<br />

adding an online edition that incorporates user-generated content (UGC), and the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> this decision on its slanting <strong>of</strong> news. We assume that the capability <strong>of</strong><br />

online editions to <strong>of</strong>fer UGC is especially appreciated by readers who have extreme<br />

political opinions. We find that extension <strong>of</strong> the product mix is a dominant strategy<br />

for newspapers resulting in reduced bias <strong>of</strong> the print editions <strong>of</strong> the newspapers.<br />

When UGC is added by readers to the online editions, each newspaper is indirectly<br />

forced by subscribers to <strong>of</strong>fer two differentiated versions <strong>of</strong> its product. This extension<br />

<strong>of</strong> the product mix leads to reduced product differentiation and intensified<br />

competition on subscription fees. In addition, since the extent <strong>of</strong> slant <strong>of</strong> the online<br />

editions is partly determined by subscribers, the ability <strong>of</strong> the newspapers to extract<br />

consumer surplus via price discrimination is restricted. Due to these two effects,<br />

newspapers face reduced pr<strong>of</strong>itability in comparison to an environment where they<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer only print editions or where they have the exclusive right to choose the bias <strong>of</strong><br />

both editions.<br />

3 - Online Reviews and Consumers’ Willingness-to-pay:<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Uncertainty<br />

Yinglu Wu, PhD Candidate <strong>of</strong> Marketing, E. J. Ourso College <strong>of</strong><br />

Business, Louisiana State University, 3121 Patrick F. Taylor Hall, Baton<br />

Rouge, LA, 70803, United States <strong>of</strong> America, ywu3@tigers.lsu.edu,<br />

Jianan Wu<br />

Previous research studying the impact <strong>of</strong> online reviews on consumers’ willingnessto-pay<br />

(WTP) has focused on the valence and volume <strong>of</strong> online reviews. These<br />

studies theorized that both valence and volume took direct and independent roles in<br />

consumers’ uncertainty assessment <strong>of</strong> online purchases, thus their WTP. Results <strong>of</strong><br />

these studies showed that the valence <strong>of</strong> online reviews exhibited consistent positive<br />

impact on consumers’ WTP, but the volume did not. The literature rationalized these<br />

findings on the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> risk attitudes between consumers within the<br />

expected utility framework. Based on prospect theory and venture theory, we<br />

propose a new conceptual framework to study the relationship between online<br />

reviews and consumers’ WTP, in which we argue that the valence and volume <strong>of</strong><br />

online reviews play different roles in consumers’ uncertainty assessment. We posit<br />

that the valence <strong>of</strong> reviews, which estimates the probability <strong>of</strong> an outcome (i.e., risk),<br />

plays a direct role while the volume <strong>of</strong> reviews, which assesses the uncertainty about<br />

such probability (i.e., ambiguity), plays an indirect role. A consumer may tend to 1)<br />

overweight small probabilities and underweight large probabilities, and 2)<br />

overweight/underweight more when ambiguity is high, rendering the consumer’s<br />

preference <strong>of</strong> smaller review volume when valence is low, but larger review volume<br />

when valence is high. As such, the impact <strong>of</strong> review volume on consumers’ WTP may<br />

vary within consumers, depending upon the review valence. We test our framework<br />

using data from a controlled experiment and from an online market.<br />

MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011<br />

62<br />

4 - Failed Diffusion on Weak Tie Bridges<br />

Janghyuk Lee, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Korea University, Business <strong>School</strong>,<br />

Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136701, Korea,<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong>, janglee@korea.ac.kr, Seok-Chul Baek, Jonghoon Bae,<br />

Sukwon Kang, Hyung Noh<br />

In this research we examine whether successful diffusion draws on weak-tied bridges,<br />

i.e., the weak ties hypothesis (Granovetter 1973). By analyzing 411,078 Web blog<br />

posts created by 61,980 bloggers in June, 2006, we show that strong-tied bridges<br />

facilitate successful diffusion in terms <strong>of</strong> distance measured as maximum path length<br />

and volume measured as total number <strong>of</strong> scraps. Our findings suggest three different<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> diffusion in blog sphere: public announcement, weak-tied non-bridges,<br />

and strong-tied bridges. When diffusion via public and direct announcement is<br />

excluded, the findings <strong>of</strong> this paper demonstrate that information will successfully<br />

diffuse via strong-tied dyads and that the sender with bridge position will diffuse his<br />

or her information more successfully when he or she is embedded in strong-tied<br />

dyads.<br />

■ FD03<br />

Legends Ballroom III<br />

Online Search<br />

Cluster: Internet and Interactive Marketing<br />

Invited Session<br />

Chair: Alan Montgomery, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, Carnegie<br />

Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213,<br />

United States <strong>of</strong> America, alan.montgomery@cmu.edu<br />

1 - Consumer Search and Propensity to Buy<br />

Ofer Mintz, University <strong>of</strong> California, Paul Merage <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business,<br />

Irvine, CA, 92697-3125, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

omintz07@exchange.uci.edu<br />

This article investigates the association between consumers’ pattern <strong>of</strong> information<br />

search and their propensity to buy in a field setting. We expect that a consumer<br />

whose information search pattern is skewed towards alternative-based search will<br />

have a greater propensity to buy than a consumer whose search pattern is skewed<br />

towards attribute-based search. In addition, we expect that the price category selected<br />

by a consumer influences their subsequent pattern <strong>of</strong> search. To test these<br />

expectations, we develop a conceptual framework and consider several choice models<br />

that allow us to account for endogeneity and simultaneity in the relationship<br />

between pattern <strong>of</strong> information search and propensity to buy. The models are fit to a<br />

unique database which recorded the search and propensity to buy <strong>of</strong> 920 shoppers at<br />

a global computer manufacturer’s website. The results confirm our expectations. The<br />

implication is that a manager can now identify a consumer who has a higher<br />

propensity to buy while that consumer engages in information search prior to a<br />

purchase commitment, an important first step in targeting decisions.<br />

2 - Return on Quality Improvements in Search Engine Marketing<br />

Nadia Abou Nabout, Goethe University, Gruneburgplat 7 1, Frankfurt,<br />

60629, Germany, abounabout@wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de, Bernd Skiera<br />

In search engine marketing, such as on Google, advertisements’ ranking and prices<br />

paid per click result from generalized, second-price, sealed bid auctions that weight<br />

the submitted bids for each keyword by the quality <strong>of</strong> an advertisement.<br />

Conventional wisdom and statements by Google suggest that advertisers can only<br />

benefit from improving their advertisement’s quality. With an empirical study, this<br />

article shows the fallacy <strong>of</strong> this statement; 25 % <strong>of</strong> all quality improvements to an<br />

advertisement lead to higher prices (measured by price per click) per keyword, 70 %<br />

to higher costs for search engine marketing, and 47 % to lower pr<strong>of</strong>its. Quality<br />

improvements lead to higher weighted bids, which only lower prices if they do not<br />

improve the ranking <strong>of</strong> the advertisement. Otherwise, better ranks likely to lead to<br />

higher prices. A decomposition method can disentangle these effects and explain their<br />

joint effect on search engine marketing costs and pr<strong>of</strong>its. Finally, the results indicate<br />

that advertisers benefit if they adjust their bids after improvements to advertising<br />

quality.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!