Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Conference Sessions - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ecoming more acceptable, the dilemma companies face is how to target this unique<br />
market without alienating the mainstream and possibly diminishing the perception <strong>of</strong><br />
their brand. For the academic community, this is a new and emerging area <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
While studies focusing on gay and lesbian imagery in advertisements first appeared<br />
15 years ago, these early studies used “fake print advertisements” and only surveyed<br />
a small heterosexual population. Our study adds to the existing research by using<br />
“real print advertisements” in addition to adding responses from the LGBT<br />
community. Over 125 respondents to a survey instrument indicate the inclusion <strong>of</strong><br />
gay and lesbian imagery would likely alienate straight men more so than any other<br />
demographic group. Additionally, the results suggest that the inclusion <strong>of</strong> gay and<br />
lesbian imagery may be more appropriate to use for services rather than products.<br />
Our results also indicate that marketers should consider using subtle gay and lesbian<br />
imagery and symbols (such as a rainbow), as opposed to explicit gay and lesbian<br />
imagery (such as obvious gay and lesbian interaction), in order to appeal to both the<br />
mainstream and LGBT markets.<br />
2 - Consumer Perceptions <strong>of</strong> Corporate Gay-friendly Activities:<br />
The Role <strong>of</strong> Gender and Gay Identity<br />
Gillian Oakenfull, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Marketing, Miami University,<br />
3038 Farmer <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, Oxford, OH, 45056,<br />
United States <strong>of</strong> America, oakenfg@muohio.edu<br />
Recent corporate recognition <strong>of</strong> the attractiveness <strong>of</strong> the $641 billion gay consumer<br />
market has lead to a dramatic increase in both gay-oriented marketing activities and<br />
corporate policies. Corporate spending within the gay community totaled over $231<br />
million in 2006 (Wilke, 2007). The most commonly employed gay-friendly activities<br />
include the provision <strong>of</strong> domestic partner benefits, corporate support <strong>of</strong> gay causes,<br />
company identification as gay-friendly in marketing communications, and advertising<br />
in both gay and mainstream media (Peñaloza, 1996; Oakenfull, 2000; Tuten, 2004,<br />
2006.) While academic research has <strong>of</strong>fered some theoretical discussions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
potential benefits <strong>of</strong> gay-friendly activities, little is known about factors that may<br />
influence gay consumers’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> the gay-friendliness <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> gayoriented<br />
activities. This research explores the influence <strong>of</strong> gay identity and gender on<br />
gay consumers’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> the gay-friendliness <strong>of</strong> gay-oriented corporate<br />
activities, both internal and external to the firm. The findings <strong>of</strong> this research suggest<br />
that it is important that companies avoid a treatment <strong>of</strong> gay consumers as a group<br />
with monolithic preferences and perceptions. An individual’s level <strong>of</strong> gay identity and<br />
gender have a significant impact on perceptions <strong>of</strong> the gay-friendliness <strong>of</strong> various<br />
corporate activities. An individual with a strong gay identity will tend to perceive all<br />
gay-oriented activities that are external to the company as more gay-friendly than<br />
will an individual with a weak gay identity. Lesbians’ more socio-political identity will<br />
lead them to consider activities that are perceived as playing a strong role in<br />
legitimizing the gay and lesbian movement in mainstream society as more gayfriendly<br />
than will gay males.<br />
3 - Attitude Towards Celebrity Endorsement and Brand Loyalty:<br />
Mediating Effect <strong>of</strong> Celebrity Credibility<br />
Debasis Pradhan, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor (Marketing), <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business<br />
& Human Resources, XLRI Jamshedpur, Circuit House Area (East),<br />
Jamshedpur, Jharkhand State, 831035, India, debasis@xlri.ac.in,<br />
Duraipandian Israel<br />
Globally, the dependence <strong>of</strong> marketers on celebrity endorsement is on the rise. Indian<br />
advertising industry has seen a huge spurt <strong>of</strong> celebrity endorsement in the last decade<br />
as 60 % <strong>of</strong> Indian advertisements use celebrity endorsement. A celebrity can play<br />
multiple roles such as spokesperson, endorser, testimonial, and actor which may not<br />
be mutually exclusive. Traditionally, in extant literature three dimensions <strong>of</strong> source<br />
credibility has been taken such as attractiveness, expertise, and trustworthiness. The<br />
present study has taken an additional dimension called popularity to make it<br />
complete. While some studies have drawn inferences about the relationships between<br />
brand attitude and brand loyalty and some others about source credibility and brand<br />
attitude, the mediation effect <strong>of</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong> celebrity in the relationship between<br />
consumer’s attitude towards celebrity endorsement and brand loyalty has not<br />
received any attention. This paper makes a modest attempt to study this mediating<br />
role. The Barron & Kenny (1986) process has been used to measure the possible<br />
partial or full (if any) mediation effect <strong>of</strong> celebrity credibility. The relative impact <strong>of</strong><br />
dimensions <strong>of</strong> celebrity endorsements, along with the attitude <strong>of</strong> consumers towards<br />
celebrity endorsements on the brand loyalty has been studied. Role <strong>of</strong> gender has also<br />
been one <strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> our investigation which throws insights both for academician<br />
and practitioners in advertising field.<br />
■ FA12<br />
Champions Center II<br />
Aesthetics<br />
Contributed Session<br />
Chair: Elea McDonnell Feit, Research Director, Wharton Customer<br />
Analytics Initiative, 256 S. 37th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104,<br />
United States <strong>of</strong> America, efeit@wharton.upenn.edu<br />
1 - Inferring Color Preferences: A Utility Model Approach<br />
Seth Orsborn, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Bucknell University,<br />
121 Taylor Hall, Lewisburg, PA, 17837, United States <strong>of</strong> America,<br />
seth.orsborn@bucknell.edu, Peter Boatwright, Jonathan Cagan<br />
Although many quantitative methods have been developed for observable and<br />
discretely measurable product characteristics, there is much room to develop<br />
quantitative approaches for aesthetic preferences. Color, for example, affects<br />
MARKETING SCIENCE CONFERENCE – 2011 FA12<br />
41<br />
consumer product choices. Real estate agents routinely suggest that sellers make sure<br />
wall and floor colors are neutral in order to appeal to potential buyers, re-painting or<br />
re-carpeting if necessary. The availability <strong>of</strong> specific product colors has empirically<br />
been found to affect category sales as well, where the absence <strong>of</strong> certain previously<br />
stocked colors disproportionately reduced category sales volume [1]. The goal <strong>of</strong> this<br />
work is to develop an approach to include product color in a utility function in a way<br />
that allows managers to infer color preferences outside the discrete set <strong>of</strong> colors<br />
which were measured. Building on the continuity <strong>of</strong> color spectrum and on prior<br />
models in product forms and colors [2,3], we develop a model that allows retailers<br />
and manufacturers to use responses color swatches to infer a superior set <strong>of</strong> colors to<br />
produce and to stock. The results <strong>of</strong> this research are applicable to both<br />
manufacturers (new product decisions) and to retailers (decisions about which<br />
products to stock). [1] Boatwright, Peter, Sharad Borle, and Kirthi Kalyanam (2007),<br />
“Deconstructing Each Item’s Category Contribution,” Marketing Science, 26, 3 (May-<br />
June), 1-15. [2] Orsborn, S., Cagan, J. & Boatwright, P., 2009, “Quantifying Aesthetic<br />
Form Preference in a Utility Function”, ASME Journal <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Design, 131(6),<br />
061001. [3] Turner, H., Orsborn, S. and Grantham, K., 2009, “Quantifying Product<br />
Color Preference in a Utility Function,” Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 2009 ASEM, October 14-17,<br />
Springfield, MO, USA.<br />
2 - Product Aesthetics is Must or Plus? Trade-<strong>of</strong>fs Between Product<br />
Aesthetic and Functional Attributes<br />
Jesheng Huang, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Tamkang University, 151,<br />
Yingzhuan Rd., Danshui Dist., New Taipei Cit, Taiwan - ROC,<br />
iamjesheng@gmail.com, Chia Ming Hu<br />
Previous research has shown that consumer preferences have both hedonic and<br />
utilitarian dimensions. The aesthetic aspect <strong>of</strong> a product is normally taken as a source<br />
<strong>of</strong> hedonic consumption. What we are mostly interested in is whether the product<br />
aesthetic attribute will dominate consumer choice rather than product functional<br />
attributes? And how a preference <strong>of</strong> product aesthetic attribute will evoke the critical<br />
justification effect on hedonic consumption? Based on the research on loss aversion<br />
that demonstrates an asymmetry in evaluations depending on the direction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
proposed trade, the authors predict that differential loss aversion for product<br />
attributes may be a function <strong>of</strong> attribute importance for consumer. Therefore, this<br />
article conducted some trade-<strong>of</strong>f decision tasks under the condition <strong>of</strong> given same<br />
price for each pair <strong>of</strong> comparable aesthetic-functional attributes, in order to examine<br />
which <strong>of</strong> both opposite attributes consumer will forfeiture under the price and other<br />
attributes equals. The authors chose mp3 players as the experiment target, and design<br />
four pairs <strong>of</strong> hypothetical products, focusing on salient aesthetic versus salient<br />
functional attribute respectively, namely push button with planer vs. convex style,<br />
USB connector is hided vs. exposed, with speaker vs. non, and with touch screen vs.<br />
non. In addition, due to different aesthetic acumens among consumers, the authors<br />
clustered respondents into several groups based on the measurement <strong>of</strong> the centrality<br />
<strong>of</strong> visual product aesthetic (CVPA). The findings indicate that this aesthetic-functional<br />
trade-<strong>of</strong>fs design can derive the asymmetry in preferences <strong>of</strong> relative loss aversion<br />
between product aesthetic and functional attributes, which has significant<br />
heterogeneities among consumers with different CVPA.<br />
3 - Shaping Product Perceptions<br />
Tanuka Ghoshal, Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Indian <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, Indian<br />
<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business, AC-2 #2114, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, AP, 500032,<br />
India, tanuka_ghoshal@isb.edu, Peter Boatwright<br />
In this research we investigate the role <strong>of</strong> (aesthetically appealing) product shape in<br />
influencing product preference and perceptions. We firstly investigate whether<br />
individuals have preferences for certain kinds <strong>of</strong> shapes (curvilinear versus angular)<br />
across a range <strong>of</strong> products. We then study whether superior functional and/or<br />
hedonic benefits are attributed to aesthetically preferred shapes, for products where<br />
shape should not be associated with functionality. We finally investigate how product<br />
shape influences perceptions, and explore whether the impact occurs at a conscious<br />
or non-conscious level. We find that for common hedonic and utilitarian products<br />
(car, teapot, mp3 player, external hard drive, sports bottle etc.) the curvilinear form is<br />
preferred over the angular form by a vast majority. “Visual pleasure” is the most<br />
common spontaneous reason provided for the preference. We have preliminary<br />
evidence that visually appealing shapes may be associated with perceived superior<br />
functional benefits (example, a curvilinear external hard drive is perceived to have<br />
more capacity than an angular shaped one), and/or perceived superior hedonic<br />
benefits (example, a curvilinear teapot perceived to be “better suited for party”). We<br />
additionally find that shape can subtly impact at a non-conscious level, wherein<br />
certain functional product attributes are accorded higher (lower) importance when<br />
they are associated with a more (less) aesthetically shaped product. The importance<br />
<strong>of</strong> product design as a tool for differentiation has been <strong>of</strong>t- reiterated, however, there<br />
is little to no work isolating and examining the specific role <strong>of</strong> product shape in<br />
impacting perceived functionality, underlining the contribution <strong>of</strong> this research.