03.07.2013 Views

View/Open - Naval Postgraduate School

View/Open - Naval Postgraduate School

View/Open - Naval Postgraduate School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Frac requiring rework (Frw )<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

Project Degrades<br />

F RW = 1/(s nt + 1)<br />

Project Improves Unstable Equilibrium<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Add New Tasks Strength (snt )<br />

Figure 9. Basic Project Tipping Point Conditions<br />

Figure 9 can be used to intuitively explain the behavior of projects near the tipping point.<br />

The total backlog of projects to the lower left of the solid line decreases, and the project<br />

improves. The total backlog of projects to the right of the solid line increases, and the project<br />

degrades. The solid line represents possible tipping point conditions. A project can only remain<br />

at a tipping point if the loop B1 completes work at exactly the rate as loop R1 adds work to the<br />

project backlog (Eq. 2). In the absence of forces to keep the project stagnate, small digressions<br />

from the tipping point conditions in either direction will cause the project to improve or degrade.<br />

If either loop dominates, total backlogs will increase (R1 dominates) to project failure or<br />

decrease (B1 dominates) to project completion. Therefore, the tipping point is an unstable<br />

equilibrium.<br />

Project conditions that move across the tipping point conditions shown in Figure 9<br />

experience a change in project behavior mode from increasing to decreasing or vice versa. The<br />

shape of Figure 9 reveals intuitive insights about project conditions that generate tipping point<br />

dynamics. The negative slope of the tipping point conditions line indicates that projects that<br />

have low add-new-task strength (snt) can tolerate a higher fraction of rework (FRW) before<br />

degrading and projects with low rework fractions can tolerate higher add-new-tasks strengths.<br />

However, the tipping point relationship between add-new-tasks strength and rework fraction is<br />

not linear. A small increase in add-new-tasks strength greatly reduces the tolerable rework<br />

fraction. But as add-new-task strength increases, the tolerable rework fraction decreases more<br />

slowly, asymptotically toward a value of zero.<br />

Project Trajectory Reversal and Schedule Pressure<br />

We next investigate projects that begin on one side of the tipping point but, due to<br />

endogenous or exogenous influences, are pushed past the tipping point and reverse their<br />

behavior mode from improving to degrading or visa versa. As used here, project trajectory<br />

reversal is when the status of a project initially improves but later degrades and eventually fails<br />

=<br />

=<br />

==================^Åèìáëáíáçå=oÉëÉ~êÅÜW=ÅêÉ~íáåÖ=ëóåÉêÖó=Ñçê=áåÑçêãÉÇ=ÅÜ~åÖÉ=======- 352 -<br />

=<br />

=

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!