03.07.2013 Views

View/Open - Naval Postgraduate School

View/Open - Naval Postgraduate School

View/Open - Naval Postgraduate School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

etc. (Figure 1) (Kraljik, 1983). <strong>View</strong>ed through another lens, the first variable (importance of<br />

purchasing) translates to profit impact. One can view the second variable (complexity of<br />

supply market) as supply risk.<br />

Importance of<br />

Purchasing<br />

Criteria:<br />

- cost of materials<br />

- total costs<br />

- value-added profile<br />

- profitability profile<br />

- etc.<br />

high<br />

low<br />

Materials<br />

Management<br />

Focus: Leverage Items<br />

Focus: Strategic Items<br />

Key Performance Criteria: Key Performance Criteria:<br />

- Cost/price<br />

- Materials flow mngt<br />

- long-term availability<br />

Purchasing<br />

Management<br />

Focus: Non-critical Items<br />

Supply<br />

Management<br />

Sourcing<br />

Management<br />

Focus: Bottleneck Items<br />

Key Performance Criteria: Key Performance Criteria:<br />

- Functional efficiency -Cost management<br />

- reliable short-term<br />

sourcing<br />

low<br />

Complexity of<br />

supply market<br />

Criteria:<br />

- commodity availability<br />

- market structure<br />

- entry barriers<br />

- etc.<br />

Figure 1. Sourcing Strategies (Kraljik, 1983)<br />

As a commodity group, leverage items typically represent approximately 70% of a<br />

company’s total expenditures (Gabbard, 2004). Within this segment, the market has large<br />

capacity and offers many alternatives and many sources. Additionally, the confluence of<br />

high purchasing volume and market availability position the procurement organization in a<br />

much better negotiating position. Items in this sector are, therefore, often exploitable and<br />

offer higher profitability profiles (higher potential of returns) than items in the lower sectors.<br />

Strategic items also offer the potential for high payback. These items are vital to the<br />

ongoing operations of the company and represent approximately 20% of the dollars<br />

expended by a company (Gabbard, 2004). Compared to leverage-item purchases, though,<br />

there are fewer, large expenditure transactions for these items. Procurement experts<br />

characterize this segment as one with greater supply risk as there are fewer suppliers<br />

available and often barriers to entry (Kraljik, 1983).<br />

Experts frequently categorize the non-critical items sector as a buyer’s market.<br />

These items typically only constitute approximately 5% of a company’s spend (Gabbard,<br />

2004). The market offers many options and multiple suppliers, and buyers typically have<br />

=<br />

==================^Åèìáëáíáçå=oÉëÉ~êÅÜW=`ob^qfkd=pvkbodv=clo=fkclojba=`e^kdb====- 30 -<br />

=<br />

=<br />

high

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!