18.07.2013 Views

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

groups also appeared to increase their hip flexion moment to compensate for reductions about the<br />

knee.<br />

Discussion<br />

This study presents the first attempt to compare knee biomechanics during walking and landing<br />

between the two most commonly used graft types for ACL reconstruction and an activity<br />

matched control group. The most notable difference between the groups was seen in the moments<br />

about the knee. The patellar tendon group had a reduced external knee flexion moment at mid<br />

stance in gait and during single limb landing. The hamstring group had a reduced external<br />

extension moment at terminal stance. As the principle difference between the groups appeared to<br />

be the graft itself, these biomechanical changes may result from the effects of graft harvest. There<br />

is some evi<strong>de</strong>nce to suggest that reduced knee flexion interferes with the normal ability of the<br />

knee to absorb shock [6], and may lead to early <strong>de</strong>generative joint changes. If this is the case, the<br />

patellar tendon patients would be expected to be at greater risk of this. Clearly further long term<br />

studies are required to explore the relationship between knee biomechanics and osteoarthritis.<br />

This is an area worthy of future research as both graft types are currently used for ACL<br />

reconstruction to allow patients to return to sporting activities.<br />

References<br />

1. Bush-Joseph, C.A., et al., Dynamic function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous<br />

patellar tendon. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2001. 29(1): p. 36-41.<br />

2. Devita, P., T. Hortobagyi, and J. Barrier, Gait biomechanics are not normal after anterior cruciate ligament<br />

reconstruction and accelerated rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1998. 30(10): p. 1481-8.<br />

3. Ferber, R., et al., Gait mechanics in chronic ACL <strong>de</strong>ficiency and subsequent repair. Clin Biomech, 2002.<br />

17(4): p. 274-85.<br />

4. Georgoulis, A., et al., Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-<strong>de</strong>ficient<br />

and reconstructed knee during walking. Am J Sports Med, 2003. 31(1): p. 75-9.<br />

5. Noyes, F.R., et al., The anterior cruciate ligament-<strong>de</strong>ficient knee with varus alignment. An analysis of gait<br />

adaptations and dynamic joint loadings. Am J Sports Med, 1992. 20(6): p. 707-16.<br />

6. Cook, T., et al., Effects of restricted knee flexion and walking speed on the vertical ground reaction force<br />

during gait. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther., 1997. 25(4): p. 236-44.<br />

- 187 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!