1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
O-41<br />
AN EXPLORATION OF THE FUNCTION OF THE TRICEPS SURAE DURING<br />
NORMAL GAIT USING FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION<br />
Stewart, Caroline Dr 1 , Postans, Neil Dr 1 , Schwartz, Michael Dr 2,3 , Rozumalski, Adam Mr 2 ,<br />
Roberts, Andrew Mr 1<br />
1 ORLAU, RJAH Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, UK<br />
2 Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare, St Paul, USA<br />
3 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA<br />
Summary/conclusions<br />
This study uses random bursts of functional electrical stimulation (FES) to perturb normal gait.<br />
The results are used as an indicator of the normal function of the calf muscles and also to<br />
provi<strong>de</strong> supporting evi<strong>de</strong>nce for predictions based on induced acceleration analysis (IAA).<br />
Gastrocnemius and soleus are shown to have opposing actions at the knee and ankle during<br />
second rocker. These counterintuitive results correlate with published predictions from IAA.<br />
Introduction<br />
The triceps surae muscle comprises soleus and the two heads of gastrocnemius. All cross the<br />
ankle and subtalar joints, having plantarflexing moment arms. Only gastrocnemius crosses the<br />
knee, where it has a flexing moment arm. Manual muscle testing produces a predictable<br />
response and, intuitively, the common tendon suggests a similar action at the ankle.<br />
Computer simulation techniques have been used to investigate the role of particular muscles<br />
during gait. Recent work using IAA has yiel<strong>de</strong>d some surprising results for the calf muscles,<br />
<strong>de</strong>monstrating that gastrocnemius and soleus sometimes have opposing functions [1] [2]. IAA<br />
mo<strong>de</strong>ls, results, presentation and interpretation vary and the approach is not without its critics<br />
[3]. There is a clear need for additional practical validation.<br />
The aim of this study was to investigate the dynamic action of the triceps surae muscles, during<br />
normal gait, using discrete bursts of FES. IAA can also be consi<strong>de</strong>red to be a perturbation<br />
away from the existing dynamics, hence the FES results can be compared directly with IAA<br />
predictions.<br />
Statement of clinical significance<br />
The triceps surae muscles are frequently implicated in the <strong>de</strong>velopment of pathological gait<br />
patterns in conditions such as cerebral palsy. Many different treatments are recommen<strong>de</strong>d,<br />
including surgery, Botulinum toxin injection and stretching programmes. In or<strong>de</strong>r to treat the<br />
muscles appropriately it is important to un<strong>de</strong>rstand their function during normal walking.<br />
Computer simulation is becoming a clinically important tool in the <strong>de</strong>cision making process<br />
following gait analysis. If a direct link can be <strong>de</strong>monstrated between the response of subjects<br />
in the gait laboratory and the results of the mo<strong>de</strong>ls then researchers and clinicians will have<br />
much greater confi<strong>de</strong>nce in using this kind of information.<br />
Methods<br />
5 adult male subjects volunteered to take part in the study. No subject had any pathology<br />
affecting their walking. Each had one lower limb tested, selected at random. One pair of FES<br />
electro<strong>de</strong>s was placed over the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscle and a second over<br />
soleus. The timing of the stimulation was controlled using foot switches. The pulse width of<br />
the stimulation was altered to elicit as strong a contraction as was tolerable.<br />
A full body marker set was used and gait data collected using a Vicon 612 system in<br />
conjunction with a single Kistler force plate. Six different stimulation conditions were tested,<br />
the two muscles with three different timings - first, second and third rockers. The or<strong>de</strong>r of the<br />
testing was randomized. In each case a series of walking trials was collected, with each trial<br />
randomly assigned for stimulation or no stimulation. For the stimulation trials only the stance<br />
- 150 -