18.07.2013 Views

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

O-35<br />

ENERGY EXPENDITURE DURING OVER GROUND WALKING<br />

IN PAEDIATRIC AMPUTEES<br />

Jeans, KA, MS and Karol, LA, MD<br />

Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dallas, Texas, USA<br />

Summary/conclusions<br />

Results for self selected walking (SSW) in children with lower extremity amputation show that<br />

amputees of all levels tend to reduce their walking speed (a significant <strong>de</strong>crease was found in<br />

the hip disarticulation (HD) group), but the cost of ambulation and heart rate (HR) are only<br />

significantly increased in the HD group, compared to normal. Our study fails to support<br />

previous adult research that shows that as the level of amputation ascends the leg, energy cost<br />

and HR increase while SSW velocity <strong>de</strong>creases. This study <strong>de</strong>monstrates that although<br />

amputees choose to walk at a slightly slower SSW speed, the energy cost and HR of<br />

participants with Symes, below knee amputations (BKA), knee disarticulations (KD) and<br />

above knee amputations (AKA) are within normal range during SSW.<br />

Introduction<br />

In reviewing the amputee literature regarding energy expenditure, it is clear that the adult<br />

population is well <strong>de</strong>scribed [1], but less information can be found on the paediatric<br />

population. Herbert et al compared children with BKA to normal during treadmill walking at<br />

self selected speed and found that patients with BKA were able to maintain similar walking<br />

speed but had significantly higher energy costs than patients with intact limbs [2]. They did<br />

not find significant differences in HR, as the adult literature reports [1]. Ashley et al. measured<br />

HR and SSW velocity in children with Symes, BKA, KD and AKA and found that all groups<br />

walked at a slightly <strong>de</strong>creased speed, with an increased HR [3].<br />

Statement of clinical significance<br />

It is unclear if the results reported in the adult literature can be directly related to the paediatric<br />

population at multiple levels of amputation. The purpose of this study is to compare the energy<br />

efficiency of children with lower extremity amputation between groups and to age matched<br />

normals.<br />

Methods<br />

Unilateral amputees over the age of five were invited to participate in this IRB approved study.<br />

Exclusion criteria for testing inclu<strong>de</strong>d: prosthetic use of less than 6 months, prosthetic<br />

complications and skin breakdown. All participants were required to refrain from eating two<br />

hours prior to testing. Oxygen consumption was collected using the K4 b2 oxygen analysis<br />

telemetry unit (Cosmed, Rome, Italy). A five minute seated rest period was collected prior to a<br />

ten minute walk at a self selected speed around a 40 meter track. One minute of steady-state<br />

data was selected from rest and SSW, and reduced. Patients were grouped according to level<br />

of amputation: Symes, BKA, KD, AKA and HD. Each amputee was then compared to the<br />

appropriate group of age matched normals: Child 6-12yrs or Teen 13-19yrs. Variables<br />

analyzed were resting VO2 Rate (ml/kg/min), resting HR (bpm), VO2 Cost (ml/kg/m), HR<br />

(bpm) and velocity (m/min). A Tukey post-hoc multiple comparison procedure was run to<br />

compare amputee levels and to compare amputees with normal. The overall error rate is<br />

controlled at 0.05.<br />

Results<br />

Forty-three unilateral amputees and 39 normal children participated in this study. Subject<br />

<strong>de</strong>mographics can be seen in Table 1. All amputees were age matched and compared to the<br />

appropriate group. The Symes group had significantly higher BMI than normal. No other<br />

- 130 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!