1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
variability was larger (p < .001) for the hemiplegics (53ms) than for the control participants<br />
(15ms).<br />
For trials with clear frequency coupling (| ∆f| < 0.05), the variability of the relative phase between<br />
ipsilateral instants of auditory pacing and heel strikes σ for the left and right si<strong>de</strong> were compared.<br />
In the control group variability of relative phase did not differ significantly between the left<br />
(7.3°) and right (7.1°) si<strong>de</strong> of the body, whereas in the hemiplegic group σ was significantly (p <<br />
.05)lower for the non-paretic si<strong>de</strong> (9.5°) than for the paretic si<strong>de</strong> (11.7°).<br />
Figure 1. Spectrograms; contribution of frequency<br />
components is proportional to the brightness.<br />
Discussion<br />
The analysis of auditory-motor coordination showed that in stroke patients the relative phase<br />
variability between ipsilateral pacing signals and heel strikes σ was significantly lower for the<br />
non-paretic si<strong>de</strong> than for the paretic si<strong>de</strong>. In general, local <strong>de</strong>crease of variability may indicate<br />
points or regions in the workspace where useful task-specific information is available, such as<br />
information about the required timing [3]. Given such ‘anchoring’ [3], it may be postulated that<br />
stroke patients coordinate their gait to the perceptual stimulus by predominantly controlling (i.e.,<br />
synchronizing, timing) the movements of the non-paretic body si<strong>de</strong> to the ipsilateral pacing<br />
stimulus. Apparently, this is the most efficient way to <strong>de</strong>al with their gait asymmetry in this<br />
perceptual-motor task (i.e., paced walking). In the control group, no indications for lateralized<br />
auditory-motor anchoring were observed. These results substantiate the suggestion by Wagenaar<br />
and Beek [2] that tweaking the perception-action coupling by means of external rhythms can<br />
improve the spatiotemporal organization of pathological gait. Interestingly, from these<br />
observations new rehabilitation strategies might be distilled. For example, instructing<br />
hemiplegics to couple the heel strikes of their paretic instead of their non-paretic leg to the pacing<br />
signal might tentatively lead to improved gait coordination by increasing step length of the<br />
paretic limb.<br />
References<br />
[1] Wagenaar RC, Beek WJ (1992). Hemiplegic gait: a kinematic analysis using walking speed as a basis. Journal of<br />
Biomechanics, 25, 1007-1015<br />
[2] Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR (1997). Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke<br />
rehabilitation. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 151:207-212.<br />
[3] Beek PJ (1989). Juggling dynamics. Free University Press, Amsterdam<br />
- 191 -