18.07.2013 Views

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

O-10<br />

FEASIBILITY OF A NEW -JOINT CONSTRAINED- LOWER LIMB MODEL FOR<br />

GAIT ANALYSIS APPLICATION<br />

Pavan EE, PhD, Taboga P, Dr.Eng, and Frigo C, Ass Prof<br />

Laboratory of Movement Biomechanics and Motor Control (TBM Lab)<br />

Department of Bioengineering, Polytechnic of Milan, Milan, Italy<br />

Summary/conclusions<br />

A lower limb mo<strong>de</strong>l has been <strong>de</strong>veloped in which kinematic constraints of hip, knee, and ankle<br />

joints are <strong>de</strong>fined on the basis of functional anatomy and data collected from MRI and<br />

Fluoroscopy. In particular the femoral-tibial motion was supposed to be constrained by the<br />

knee cruciate ligaments. The feasibility of the mo<strong>de</strong>l was checked on a normal subject walking<br />

on level at natural ca<strong>de</strong>nce and performing on site exercises. Thirty-one reflective markers<br />

were positioned on pelvis and lower limbs: they were used to i<strong>de</strong>ntify anatomical landmarks<br />

and allowed us to connect a 3-D mo<strong>de</strong>l of bones to the collected data. Our results show that<br />

kinematics of femur in relation to pelvis and shank can be accurately obtained through<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntification of hip joint centre, shank location, and knee joint kinematic constraints. The<br />

markers located on the thigh (greater trochanter, medial and lateral femoral epicondyles),<br />

which were the most affected by skin motion artefacts, can be profitably removed from our<br />

protocol, and the advantage will be reduced encumbrance and improved accuracy.<br />

Introduction<br />

Protocols for clinical gait analysis can be subdivi<strong>de</strong>d into those who don’t impose any joint<br />

constraint (each segment is an in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt free body in space), and those who pre-<strong>de</strong>fine a<br />

linkage between the anatomical segments. The advantage of the last ones is evi<strong>de</strong>nt, in that the<br />

congruency of the relative movement of adjacent segments is inherently guaranteed,<br />

measurement errors of markers coordinates can be better distributed along the total limb, the<br />

problem of magnification of orientation errors of the local reference axes, because the markers<br />

are not positioned at the extremity of the anatomical segments, can be consi<strong>de</strong>rably reduced<br />

[1]. On the other si<strong>de</strong> the joint-constrained mo<strong>de</strong>ls adopt very simple spherical or cylindrical<br />

hinges to <strong>de</strong>scribe the joint kinematics, which is ina<strong>de</strong>quate particularly as far as the knee joint<br />

is consi<strong>de</strong>red. Due to this ina<strong>de</strong>quacy the rigid body hypothesis cannot be satisfied, and<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rable errors can be done in muscle-length estimation if muscle-tendon action lines are<br />

just attached to the skeleton mo<strong>de</strong>l. Our new mo<strong>de</strong>l attempts at overcoming the previous<br />

drawbacks by integrating imaging information into a mo<strong>de</strong>l of the lower limb.<br />

Statement of clinical significance<br />

An improved i<strong>de</strong>ntification of lower limb kinematics can be achieved trough proper mo<strong>de</strong>lling<br />

and anthropometric data collection from biomedical imaging. According to our scheme the<br />

markers on the thigh, which are the most affected by skin motion artefacts, can be avoi<strong>de</strong>d, and<br />

this can be an advantage in terms of reduced encumbrance and preparation time, that could be<br />

of interest for clinical application of gait analysis.<br />

Methods<br />

A motion analyser (SMART, eMotion, Italy) equipped with 6 TV-cameras located in a gait<br />

analysis laboratory was used for our experimental sessions. The mo<strong>de</strong>l proposed was<br />

composed of four anatomical segments: pelvis, thigh, shank and foot. At variance with a<br />

previous protocol [2] the number of markers (31 in total) was redundant, in or<strong>de</strong>r to check for<br />

the relative inaccuracy. Five markers were located on the pelvis, and then, bilaterally, four on<br />

the thigh, five on the shank, and three on the foot. The hip, knee and ankle joint centres were<br />

tentatively i<strong>de</strong>ntified as <strong>de</strong>scribed in [3]. Then a 3-D mo<strong>de</strong>l shank bones, obtained from<br />

previous elaboration of MRI [4] was adapted to the present subject by making them to best<br />

- 56 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!