1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
O-37<br />
SUBJECT SPECIFIC HIP GEOMETRY AFTER THP INFLUENCES<br />
HIP JOINT REACTION FORCES DURING GAIT<br />
Lenaerts G, Dra 1-2 , Jonkers I, Phd 1 , Van <strong>de</strong>r Perre G, MS, Prof 2 , Spaepen A, MS, Prof 1<br />
1 Dept. of Biomedical Kinesiologym FaBeR, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium<br />
2 Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, FTW, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium<br />
Summary/conclusions<br />
Subject specific hip geometry (especially NSA) after total hip joint replacement alters the joint<br />
reaction forces at the hip and affects implant loading.<br />
Introduction<br />
Each year, 17 000 hip prostheses are implanted in Belgium. 5 – 10% need revision because of<br />
implant loosening. Several factors have been i<strong>de</strong>ntified to predispose implant loosening.<br />
Musculoskeletal loading is often reported as an important factor affecting the biological<br />
processes involved in bone remo<strong>de</strong>ling and primary fixation of implants. In patients with THP,<br />
the subject specific anatomy of the hip implant <strong>de</strong>termines the moment generating capacity of<br />
the surrounding muscles. Our previous work [3] reported a <strong>de</strong>crease in moment generating<br />
capacity of the hip abductors when a subject specific mo<strong>de</strong>l was used that incorporates RX<br />
based values for femoral neck length (NL), femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) and width of the<br />
pelvis (WP). As a result, we reported marked changes in calculated muscle (co-) activations<br />
using a static optimization approach. The present work evaluates to what extent hip contact<br />
forces during gait are influenced by subject-specific geometry of the hip and the resulting<br />
changes in muscle activation balance during gait.<br />
Statement of clinical significance<br />
A better insight in the biomechanical factors influencing hip loading during gait after THP will<br />
contribute to an enhanced un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the factors affecting initial implant fixation and<br />
eventually prevent implant loosening.<br />
Methods<br />
NL, NSA and WP were measured in 20 subjects, based on digitized post-operative RX-images<br />
(Imagica, GreyStone Inc). A <strong>de</strong>formable musculoskeletal mo<strong>de</strong>l of the lower limb was<br />
adjusted to incorporate NL, NSA and WP for all patients (SIMM, Musculographics). NL<br />
varied from 41 mm to 86 mm, NSA between113° and 144°, PW between 315 mm and 402<br />
mm. Kinematic and kinetic data obtained from a normal gait trial were imposed to each<br />
individualised mo<strong>de</strong>l to calculate (1) joint moments (2) individual muscle force generating<br />
capacity and (3) muscle moment arms over the gait cycle. Muscle activation patterns balancing<br />
the external joint moments were computed using a static optimisation algorithm, minimizing<br />
the sum of the muscle forces (Matlab, MathWorks Inc.). The 3D hip reaction forces were<br />
computed taking into account the muscle forces resulting from the muscle activation patterns,<br />
as well as external forces (the ground reaction forces – inertial forces and gravity). This<br />
analysis was repeated for a mo<strong>de</strong>l with halve hip abductor force generating capacity,<br />
mimicking hip abductor weakness after surgery. The resulting changes in muscle activations<br />
were imposed[1]. Peak reaction forces during single limb stance as well as the associated<br />
inclination of the reaction force in the sagittal and the frontal plane are reported.<br />
Results<br />
The peak reation forces in the un<strong>de</strong>formed mo<strong>de</strong>l are within the range reported in literature [2].<br />
The changes in muscle activations due to the modified geometry introduced changes in peak<br />
reaction forces (Figure 1). Consistent changes were most pronounced for the mediolateral<br />
component showing a <strong>de</strong>crease in the peak mediolateral component with increasing NSA.<br />
- 134 -