18.07.2013 Views

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

O-26<br />

CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT SHOULDER JOINT KINEMATICS DESCRIPTION<br />

Morrow, Duane A, MS, Lin, Hui-Ting, MS, Kaufman, Kenton R, PhD, An, Kai-Nan, PhD<br />

Department of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA<br />

Summary/conclusions<br />

While there are numerous methods available for the calculation of shoul<strong>de</strong>r joint kinematics,<br />

the ability to present these in clinically significant terms has remained a challenge. Through<br />

realignment of coordinate axes on the humerus, shoul<strong>de</strong>r kinematics can be calculated in terms<br />

that are familiar in clinical settings.<br />

Introduction<br />

The ability to <strong>de</strong>scribe calculated shoul<strong>de</strong>r joint kinematics in clinically relevant terms has, to<br />

date, been difficult. This difficulty has likely been compoun<strong>de</strong>d by the plethora of methods<br />

used to <strong>de</strong>compose the rotation of the shoul<strong>de</strong>r joint. Rotations captured using motion analysis<br />

techniques are analysed most wi<strong>de</strong>ly using either Euler angle or screw axis <strong>de</strong>composition.<br />

While those who use Euler angles in their analyses may choose to follow the rotation sequence<br />

initially proposed by An [1] and recommen<strong>de</strong>d by the ISB [2], This method, however, offers<br />

shoul<strong>de</strong>r motion results in terms of the angle and amount of humeral elevation in lieu of<br />

outright measures of flexion/extension or ab/adduction. Additionally, in the clinical setting,<br />

neural, muscular, or skeletal disor<strong>de</strong>rs may cause individuals to take up postures and<br />

compensations that may make recommen<strong>de</strong>d coordinate assignments or <strong>de</strong>compositions<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> unwanted results. Our laboratory has previously advocated the use of screw-axes for<br />

the analysis of shoul<strong>de</strong>r motion to avoid some of the pitfalls of gimbal lock that may be<br />

associated with Euler angle <strong>de</strong>composition [3]. However, the problem still remains that<br />

shoul<strong>de</strong>r flexion/extension and ab/adduction are measures of the humerus about axes of the<br />

trunk. Internal/external rotation of the humerus can change the alignment of the humeral<br />

sagittal and coronal axes, confounding the ability to examine the motion of the humerus with<br />

respect to the trunk (or scapula, for glenohumeral motion). The current study outlines a method<br />

for presenting shoul<strong>de</strong>r kinematics in terms of clinical rotations.<br />

Statement of clinical significance<br />

A simple correction algorithm may be applied to<br />

the <strong>de</strong>composition of shoul<strong>de</strong>r joint kinematics<br />

to allow for clinically meaningful interpretation<br />

of shoul<strong>de</strong>r joint motions.<br />

Methods<br />

This study was conducted as part of a larger<br />

study for the creation of a database of normal<br />

kinematics during a set of motions used in<br />

clinical upper extremity assessments of the<br />

neck, scapulothoracic, glenohumeral, elbow,<br />

and wrist joints, as well as the thoracohumeral<br />

pseudo-joint. Subjects were asked to perform<br />

select motions (full shoul<strong>de</strong>r flexion, abduction,<br />

touching their head, touching their opposite<br />

shoul<strong>de</strong>r, etc.) in a comfortable motion. For the purposes of this discussion, only motion of the<br />

humerus with respect to the thorax during shoul<strong>de</strong>r flexion will be consi<strong>de</strong>red, due to space<br />

constraints. The motion of retro-reflective markers was tracked at 60 Hz using a 10-camera<br />

Motion Analysis EVa RealTime system (Motion Analysis Corp., Santa Clara, CA, USA).<br />

Three markers, on the xiphoid process, sternal notch, and C7, were used to <strong>de</strong>fine the trunk<br />

- 104 -<br />

Figure 1. Schematic showing marker<br />

locations and coordinate axes for<br />

humerus and trunk coordinates<br />

systems. Not shown is the C7 marker.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!