1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
O-59<br />
AUDITORY-PACED WALKING FOLLOWING STROKE<br />
Roerdink, Melvyn, MSc 2 , Lamoth, Claudine, PhD 1 , Kwakkel, Gert, PhD 1,2 , van Wieringen, Piet,<br />
PhD 2 , Beek, Peter PhD 1<br />
1 Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Human<br />
Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />
2 Department of Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
Summary/conclusions<br />
Gait coordination is usually compromised following stroke. Auditory pacing seems to be an<br />
expedient means to improve hemiplegic gait coordination, although, to date, <strong>de</strong>tailed studies of<br />
the temporal coupling between pacing signal and gait characteristics have been lacking. In the<br />
present study this coupling was studied in both healthy and hemiplegic participants walking on a<br />
treadmill. Hemiplegics predominantly coordinated the movements of their non-paretic lower limb<br />
to ipsilateral auditory pacing stimuli. This instance of perceptual-motor anchoring may provi<strong>de</strong><br />
promising possibilities for future therapeutic interventions.<br />
Introduction<br />
Stroke patients’ gait coordination is often hampered by a marked interlimb asymmetry, impaired<br />
timing of thoracic-pelvic rotations, and altered coordinative variability [1-2]. The use of auditory<br />
pacing as a therapeutic technique may positively affect hemiplegic walking, e.g., in terms of<br />
walking velocity, stri<strong>de</strong> length and gait symmetry [2]. Unfortunately, the temporal coupling<br />
between pacing signal and gait has not been studied thus far, in spite of the fact that a <strong>de</strong>tailed<br />
analysis of auditory-motor coordination might provi<strong>de</strong> valuable information about the un<strong>de</strong>rlying<br />
motor control processes. The purpose of this study was to examine auditory-motor coordination<br />
in paced walking following stroke, in particular the coordination between footfalls and the<br />
auditory pacing signal.<br />
Statement of clinical significance<br />
A better un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of auditory-paced walking in both unimpaired and pathological gait<br />
coordination might lead to both evi<strong>de</strong>nce- and theory-based rehabilitation goals, cf. [2].<br />
Methods<br />
Six individuals with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis and six age-matched healthy controls<br />
volunteered in the study. First, the stri<strong>de</strong> frequency was <strong>de</strong>termined when participants walked at<br />
their comfortable velocity on a treadmill. Subsequently, while keeping velocity constant, stri<strong>de</strong><br />
frequency was manipulated by means of auditory pacing. The pacing frequency increased in three<br />
steps from 90%, via 100%, to 110% of the stri<strong>de</strong> frequency observed in unpaced comfortable<br />
treadmill walking. Participants were instructed to synchronize heel strikes with ipsilateral<br />
auditory pacing stimuli, that is, heel strikes of the left (right) foot had to be synchronized with<br />
auditory beeps presented at the left (right) ear. Auditory-motor coordination (i.e., mean absolute<br />
error between pacing frequency and stri<strong>de</strong> frequency | ∆f| and variability of the relative phase<br />
between ipsilateral instants of auditory pacing and heel strikes σ) was compared between groups.<br />
Results<br />
All control participants and four stroke patients coupled their stri<strong>de</strong> frequency to the prescribed<br />
auditory pacing frequency. On average | ∆f | was 0.05 stri<strong>de</strong>s/min. In Figure 1, individual<br />
spectrograms are shown. The two patients with poor frequency coupling ma<strong>de</strong> more stri<strong>de</strong>s in the<br />
90% pacing condition and fewer stri<strong>de</strong>s in the 110% pacing condition than prescribed (Figure 1,<br />
lower panel). Note that stroke patients’ spectrograms exhibited larger stri<strong>de</strong>-frequency variability<br />
as well. This ten<strong>de</strong>ncy was statistically significant at the group level, i.e., stri<strong>de</strong> interval<br />
- 190 -