18.07.2013 Views

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

1st Joint ESMAC-GCMAS Meeting - Análise de Marcha

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

O-59<br />

AUDITORY-PACED WALKING FOLLOWING STROKE<br />

Roerdink, Melvyn, MSc 2 , Lamoth, Claudine, PhD 1 , Kwakkel, Gert, PhD 1,2 , van Wieringen, Piet,<br />

PhD 2 , Beek, Peter PhD 1<br />

1 Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Human<br />

Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />

2 Department of Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

Summary/conclusions<br />

Gait coordination is usually compromised following stroke. Auditory pacing seems to be an<br />

expedient means to improve hemiplegic gait coordination, although, to date, <strong>de</strong>tailed studies of<br />

the temporal coupling between pacing signal and gait characteristics have been lacking. In the<br />

present study this coupling was studied in both healthy and hemiplegic participants walking on a<br />

treadmill. Hemiplegics predominantly coordinated the movements of their non-paretic lower limb<br />

to ipsilateral auditory pacing stimuli. This instance of perceptual-motor anchoring may provi<strong>de</strong><br />

promising possibilities for future therapeutic interventions.<br />

Introduction<br />

Stroke patients’ gait coordination is often hampered by a marked interlimb asymmetry, impaired<br />

timing of thoracic-pelvic rotations, and altered coordinative variability [1-2]. The use of auditory<br />

pacing as a therapeutic technique may positively affect hemiplegic walking, e.g., in terms of<br />

walking velocity, stri<strong>de</strong> length and gait symmetry [2]. Unfortunately, the temporal coupling<br />

between pacing signal and gait has not been studied thus far, in spite of the fact that a <strong>de</strong>tailed<br />

analysis of auditory-motor coordination might provi<strong>de</strong> valuable information about the un<strong>de</strong>rlying<br />

motor control processes. The purpose of this study was to examine auditory-motor coordination<br />

in paced walking following stroke, in particular the coordination between footfalls and the<br />

auditory pacing signal.<br />

Statement of clinical significance<br />

A better un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of auditory-paced walking in both unimpaired and pathological gait<br />

coordination might lead to both evi<strong>de</strong>nce- and theory-based rehabilitation goals, cf. [2].<br />

Methods<br />

Six individuals with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis and six age-matched healthy controls<br />

volunteered in the study. First, the stri<strong>de</strong> frequency was <strong>de</strong>termined when participants walked at<br />

their comfortable velocity on a treadmill. Subsequently, while keeping velocity constant, stri<strong>de</strong><br />

frequency was manipulated by means of auditory pacing. The pacing frequency increased in three<br />

steps from 90%, via 100%, to 110% of the stri<strong>de</strong> frequency observed in unpaced comfortable<br />

treadmill walking. Participants were instructed to synchronize heel strikes with ipsilateral<br />

auditory pacing stimuli, that is, heel strikes of the left (right) foot had to be synchronized with<br />

auditory beeps presented at the left (right) ear. Auditory-motor coordination (i.e., mean absolute<br />

error between pacing frequency and stri<strong>de</strong> frequency | ∆f| and variability of the relative phase<br />

between ipsilateral instants of auditory pacing and heel strikes σ) was compared between groups.<br />

Results<br />

All control participants and four stroke patients coupled their stri<strong>de</strong> frequency to the prescribed<br />

auditory pacing frequency. On average | ∆f | was 0.05 stri<strong>de</strong>s/min. In Figure 1, individual<br />

spectrograms are shown. The two patients with poor frequency coupling ma<strong>de</strong> more stri<strong>de</strong>s in the<br />

90% pacing condition and fewer stri<strong>de</strong>s in the 110% pacing condition than prescribed (Figure 1,<br />

lower panel). Note that stroke patients’ spectrograms exhibited larger stri<strong>de</strong>-frequency variability<br />

as well. This ten<strong>de</strong>ncy was statistically significant at the group level, i.e., stri<strong>de</strong> interval<br />

- 190 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!