20.07.2013 Views

Download - Department of Linguistics and English Language ...

Download - Department of Linguistics and English Language ...

Download - Department of Linguistics and English Language ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.1 Introduction<br />

Chapter 3. Basic Word Order<br />

This chapter addresses the issue <strong>of</strong> basic word order. This issue is somewhat complex,<br />

since the subject may occupy one <strong>of</strong> three different sentential positions <strong>and</strong> since subject<br />

position is <strong>of</strong>ten constrained by clause type. While chapter 4 will provide a syntactic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> declaratives, this chapter focuses on describing the basic word order patterns<br />

<strong>of</strong> Marshallese sentences <strong>and</strong> examining the phonological, semantic <strong>and</strong> syntactic factors<br />

that affect subject position. I will argue that the subject surfaces in a particular position as<br />

a result <strong>of</strong> either its information status or the information status <strong>of</strong> the predicate, although<br />

the syntax prohibits the subject from surfacing in some positions in some types <strong>of</strong><br />

sentences. I will show that topicalized <strong>and</strong> focused subjects appear sentence initially, that<br />

neutral subjects appear sentence internally, <strong>and</strong> that subjects appear sentence finally as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> topicalization or focalization <strong>of</strong> the predicate. Further, I will show that sentences<br />

with final subjects have a different phonological status than the other two types <strong>of</strong><br />

sentences.<br />

This chapter proceeds as follows. In section 3.2.1, I catalogue the positions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Marshallese subject in different types <strong>of</strong> transitive sentences, including sentences with<br />

only one internal DP argument; those with both an internal DP <strong>and</strong> internal PP argument;<br />

<strong>and</strong> sentences with a CP argument. Section 3.2.2 examines intransitives, including those<br />

with <strong>and</strong> without prepositional phrases. The examination <strong>of</strong> transitive <strong>and</strong> intransitive<br />

sentences reveals that, while the subject may be sentence internal in intransitives, it may<br />

not be internal in transitives. In section 3.3, I turn to the phonology <strong>and</strong> semantics <strong>of</strong><br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!