20.07.2013 Views

Download - Department of Linguistics and English Language ...

Download - Department of Linguistics and English Language ...

Download - Department of Linguistics and English Language ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(384)<br />

AgrSP<br />

AgrS<br />

e<br />

3s<br />

AgrS'<br />

T<br />

4.2.5 V S O order<br />

TP<br />

X<br />

T'<br />

Vi X<br />

ju<br />

'be tall<br />

<strong>and</strong> straight'<br />

XP<br />

X'<br />

VP<br />

ti ni eo<br />

'the coconut tree'<br />

One final virtue <strong>of</strong> the analysis I have presented for Marshallese declaratives is that it can<br />

explain why V S O order is not possible in Marshallese. In pursuit <strong>of</strong> this explanation, I<br />

turn to an idea proposed by Belletti (2001, 2004), who rules out the same word order in<br />

Italian. Belletti argues that the ungrammaticality <strong>of</strong> V S O stems from the way accusative<br />

case is assigned. Following Chomsky (2001, 2002), she assumes that both nominative<br />

<strong>and</strong> accusative case may be assigned non-locally as opposed to through a spec-head<br />

relationship. Therefore nominative case may be assigned by T to a postverbal subject<br />

through an Agree relationship. In a similar fashion, Belletti proposes that accusative case<br />

is also assigned to the object via Agree, but rather than assuming that accusative case is<br />

assigned within the verb phrase, she assumes that it is assigned by an accusative case<br />

assigning head (Acc) that heads Acc(usative)P. This AccP, she argues, is higher in the<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!