21.07.2013 Views

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 203 a, b, and c<br />

and the 1966 version of Fed. R. Civ. P. 17 (a).<br />

REPORTER’S NOTE<br />

A judge of the Court of Appeals requested that the Rules<br />

Committee study whether the Rules should be amended by the<br />

addition of a general “John Doe” rule concerning the right of a<br />

party to proceed anonymously. The “John Doe” issue was discussed<br />

in Doe v. Shady Grove Hospital, 89 Md. App. 351 (1991). In that<br />

case, the Court of Special Appeals held that papers filed in an<br />

action may be filed in the name of “John Doe” if protecting the<br />

confidentiality of a party’s identity serves a compelling<br />

government interest or provides a necessary right to privacy.<br />

After its review of Doe and procedures in other jurisdictions,<br />

and given the infrequency of this type of filing, the Committee<br />

recommends that Rules 2-201 and 3-201 be amended by the addition<br />

of a cross reference to the Doe case at the end of each Rule.<br />

-11-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!