21.07.2013 Views

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

341 provide that an amendment to a pleading without leave of<br />

court must be filed no later than the date set forth in the<br />

scheduling order entered pursuant to Rule 2-504 or, in actions in<br />

which there is no scheduling order, no later than 30 days before<br />

a scheduled trial date.<br />

Proposed amendments to Rule 2-504 modify the required<br />

contents of a scheduling order by requiring that the order<br />

contain a date by which any additional parties must be joined and<br />

a date by which amendments to pleadings are allowed as of right.<br />

The amendments also require that the deadline for filing a<br />

dispositive motion be a date that is no earlier than 15 days<br />

after the date by which all discovery must be completed, that the<br />

scheduling order controls the subsequent course of the action,<br />

and that the court shall modify the scheduling order to prevent<br />

injustice. Lastly, in conjunction with the proposed Rules<br />

changes set forth in Category Five of this Report, the<br />

appointment of counsel for a child in an action involving child<br />

custody or child access is proposed to be added to the permitted<br />

contents of a scheduling order that are set forth in subsection<br />

(b)(2) of the Rule.<br />

Proposed to be added to Rules 2-532, 2-533, 2-534, and 2-535<br />

are “saving” provisions for prematurely filed post-judgment<br />

motions, similar to the “saving” provision set forth in Rule 8-<br />

602 (d). Also in Category One, in light of Chapter 534, Laws of<br />

2006 (SB 726), are proposed amendments to Rules 2-641, 3-641, 2-<br />

644, and 3-644 that add to each Rule a cross reference concerning<br />

execution of a judgment against the property of a corporation,<br />

joint stock company, association, limited liability company, or<br />

limited liability limited partnership for the amount of fines or<br />

costs awarded against it in a criminal proceeding.<br />

Category Two comprises proposed changes to seven Rules in<br />

Title 4 and a related amendment to Rule 16-819 (d). In light of<br />

Chapter 586, Laws of 2006 (HB 833), cross references concerning<br />

surety insurers who fail to resolve or satisfy bond forfeitures<br />

are proposed to be added following subsections (d)(1) and (d)(2)<br />

of Rule 4-217. A proposed amendment to Rule 4-261 allows a<br />

deposition in an action in the District Court under the same<br />

circumstances under which a deposition in an action in a circuit<br />

court may be taken. Cross references following Rules 4-342 (g)<br />

and 4-345 (e) concerning the commitment of a defendant who has a<br />

drug or alcohol dependency to a treatment program in the<br />

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene are proposed to be added<br />

in light of Chapter 338, Laws of 2006 (HB 656). Proposed<br />

amendments to Rule 4-343 clarify the capital sentencing form with<br />

respect to mitigating circumstances and make stylistic changes to<br />

the form. In light of Chapter 353, Laws of 2006 (HB 795), a<br />

cross reference concerning procedures to be followed by the court<br />

when a defendant may be incompetent to stand trial in a violation<br />

-4-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!