21.07.2013 Views

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section (d) (c) is derived from former Rule 740 d.<br />

Section (e) (d) is derived from former Rule 740 e.<br />

Section (f) (e) is derived from former Rule 740 f.<br />

Section (g) (f) is derived from former Rule 740 g.<br />

Section (h) (g) is derived from former Rule 740 h.<br />

Section (i) (h) is derived from former Rule 740 i.<br />

REPORTER’S NOTE<br />

The proposed amendments to Rule 4-261 allow a deposition in<br />

the District Court under the same circumstances under which a<br />

deposition is allowed in a circuit court, i.e., either by<br />

agreement of the parties or by order of court if the court is<br />

satisfied that a witness whose testimony may be material may be<br />

unable to attend a trial or hearing and that the taking of a<br />

deposition is necessary to prevent a failure of justice.<br />

Depositions in circuit court criminal actions are rare, and the<br />

Rules Committee believes that they will occur with even less<br />

frequency in the District Court. However, in circumstances such<br />

as the impending military deployment overseas of a key witness,<br />

the ability to preserve the witness’s testimony for trial should<br />

not depend upon the agreement of the opposing party.<br />

-37-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!