21.07.2013 Views

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

action.<br />

(G) any other matter pertinent to the management of the<br />

(c) Modification of Order<br />

The scheduling order controls the subsequent course of the<br />

action but shall be modified by the court to prevent injustice.<br />

Cross reference: See Rule 5-706 for authority of the court to<br />

appoint expert witnesses.<br />

Source: This Rule is new.<br />

REPORTER’S NOTE<br />

The Rules Committee has been advised that at least one<br />

jurisdiction incorporates in its scheduling order a requirement<br />

that all dispositive motions must be filed prior to the date by<br />

which all discovery must be completed. Because the grounds for a<br />

dispositive motion may not be apparent until after discovery has<br />

been completed, the Committee recommends that Rule 2-504<br />

(b)(1)(E) be modified by the addition of the phase, “which shall<br />

be no earlier than 15 days after the date by which all discovery<br />

must be completed.”<br />

In conjunction with proposed amendments to Rule 2-341, the<br />

Committee recommends certain other amendments to Rule 2-504.<br />

Current subsection (b)(2)(C) is proposed to be transferred to<br />

subsection (b)(1), becoming new subsection (b)(1)(F), so that<br />

inclusion of a date by which additional parties must be joined is<br />

a required, rather than a permitted, component of each scheduling<br />

order. A new subsection (b)(1)(G) is proposed to be added,<br />

requiring in each scheduling order a date by which amendments to<br />

pleadings are allowed as of right. Proposed new section (c)<br />

provides that the scheduling order controls the subsequent course<br />

of the action and that the court shall modify a scheduling order<br />

to prevent injustice.<br />

In conjunction with proposed new Appendix to the <strong>Maryland</strong><br />

Rules: <strong>Maryland</strong> Guidelines for Practice for Court-Appointed<br />

Lawyers Representing Children in Cases Involving Child Custody or<br />

Child Access and proposed new Rule 9-205.1 (Appointment of<br />

Child’s Counsel), proposed new subsection (b)(2)(E) adds to the<br />

permitted contents of a scheduling order an order appointing<br />

child’s counsel in accordance with Rule 9-205.1.<br />

-20-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!