21.07.2013 Views

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REPORTER’S NOTE<br />

The Honorable Thomas P. Smith, of the Circuit Court for<br />

Prince George’s County, observed that often there is an<br />

inconsistency between Rule 2-341 and the scheduling orders issued<br />

pursuant to Rule 2-504. The scheduling orders provide that any<br />

amendments to pleadings must be filed by a date certain, but Rule<br />

2-341 allows amendments to pleadings to be filed at any time.<br />

Sections (a) and (b) of Rule 2-341 are proposed to be restructured<br />

as to amendments without leave of court (section (a))<br />

and amendments with leave of court (section (b)). Amendments<br />

without leave of court must be filed by the date set forth in the<br />

scheduling order or, if there is none, no later than 30 days<br />

before a scheduled trial date. Amendments filed after those<br />

dates require leave of court.<br />

The Committee believes that 60 days before trial, the time<br />

the current Rule allows for amendments without leave of court in<br />

an action in which there is no scheduling order, is unnecessarily<br />

long. An action without a scheduling order generally is less<br />

complex than an action with a scheduling order, and the Committee<br />

recommends that the 60-day provision currently in section (a) be<br />

reduced to 30 days before a scheduled trial date.<br />

Additionally, the Committee recommends that a reference to<br />

Falcinelli v. Cardascia, 339 Md. 414 (1995) be added to the<br />

Committee note that follows section (b).<br />

-16-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!