21.07.2013 Views

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

r1r STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE - Maryland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REPORTER’S NOTE<br />

At the request of the Administrative Office of the Courts<br />

(“AOC”), the Rules Committee recommends that Rule 16-819 (e) be<br />

amended by deleting the “good cause” standard from the section<br />

and replacing it with language stating that after a judge or<br />

judicial appointee removes an interpreter from a proceeding, the<br />

judge or judicial appointee must then report the removal to the<br />

AOC.<br />

The proposed Rule change allows a judge or judicial<br />

appointee, in his or her discretion, to take prompt action to<br />

remove an interpreter from a proceeding when a problem with the<br />

interpreter arises in the middle of a hearing or trial. Under<br />

the proposed amended Rule, it is unnecessary to delay or<br />

interrupt the proceeding for the purpose of making a “good cause”<br />

determination as to removal of the interpreter from the<br />

proceeding. The requirement that the removal be reported to the<br />

AOC allows the AOC to track instances of problems with an<br />

interpreter that may indicate that the interpreter should be<br />

removed from the list of court interpreters.<br />

-272-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!