Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>in</strong> Massachusetts <strong>in</strong> 1686. It is also a particularly <strong>in</strong>structive example of the<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ds of forces beh<strong>in</strong>d the <strong>in</strong>flationist proposals. The orig<strong>in</strong>ators of the<br />
scheme were emphatically not poor debtor-farmers. On the contrary, they were<br />
precisely the rul<strong>in</strong>g oligarchy of Massachusetts.<br />
The year 1686 saw Massachusetts ruled by Joseph Dudley and his associates<br />
<strong>in</strong> plunder. On assum<strong>in</strong>g office, Dudley and his Council appo<strong>in</strong>ted a committee<br />
of lead<strong>in</strong>g merchants and other citizens to study trade conditions. The<br />
committee, led by Capta<strong>in</strong> John Blackwell, reported with a proposal for a<br />
bank whose notes would be forced on the people as legal tender. The plan<br />
was to <strong>in</strong>clude all the lead<strong>in</strong>g oligarchs of the Dudley era <strong>in</strong> the directorship<br />
of the bank: Dudley himself, William Stoughton, Wait W<strong>in</strong>throp, Simon<br />
Lynde, Elisha Hutch<strong>in</strong>son, Elisha Cooke, and others. No notes were to be issued<br />
below twenty shill<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> denom<strong>in</strong>ation, to ensure that the bank would be<br />
largely limited to the wealthiest citizens. The bank was to have no specie capital<br />
whatever, though <strong>in</strong>dividual directors were to bear responsibility. The plan<br />
was abandoned with the arrival of Andros. The Glorious Revolution, <strong>in</strong> 1688,<br />
<strong>in</strong>spired new talk of the Blackwell bank, but aga<strong>in</strong> the proposal fell through.<br />
Paper money f<strong>in</strong>ally came to Massachusetts not <strong>in</strong> the form of a land bank's<br />
notes, but as the first issue of government paper money <strong>in</strong> the world, apart<br />
from medieval Ch<strong>in</strong>a.* Paper money can be issued either by government for<br />
direct spend<strong>in</strong>g, or by a bank, public or private, that lends out money to the<br />
public. While the former is cruder and more flagrant, it actually has less<br />
harmful repercussions on the economy. For, given the same amount of monetary<br />
issue, lend<strong>in</strong>g out the new money <strong>in</strong>flicts additional distortion on the<br />
loan market and <strong>in</strong>terest rates, which fact generates the familiar features of<br />
the boom-bust trade cycle.**<br />
The fateful plunge of Massachusetts <strong>in</strong>to paper money came through direct<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g rather than lend<strong>in</strong>g. Massachusetts had engaged <strong>in</strong> an expedition of<br />
plunder aga<strong>in</strong>st French Quebec, an expedition it hoped would more than pay<br />
for itself. But as luck would have it, the expedition failed ignom<strong>in</strong>iously, and<br />
Massachusetts was faced with the grave problem of pay<strong>in</strong>g the salaries of its<br />
soldiers who were on the edge of mut<strong>in</strong>y. The Massachusetts government<br />
tried to borrow from three to four thousand pounds from Boston merchants,<br />
but evidently its credit rat<strong>in</strong>g was far too low. Proceed<strong>in</strong>g upon the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />
that if it could not raise money it must pr<strong>in</strong>t its own, Massachusetts decided<br />
<strong>in</strong> December 1690 to issue 7,000 pounds <strong>in</strong> paper notes. Now the government<br />
knew that it could not simply pr<strong>in</strong>t paper irredeemable <strong>in</strong> specie labeled<br />
*There is a s<strong>in</strong>gle exception: the Card Money of Quebec. In 1685 the govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>tendant of Quebec, Monsieur Meules, decided to augment his funds by divid<strong>in</strong>g some<br />
play<strong>in</strong>g cards <strong>in</strong>to quarters, mark<strong>in</strong>g them with various denom<strong>in</strong>ations, and then issu<strong>in</strong>g<br />
them to pay for wages and materials. Meules took the precaution of order<strong>in</strong>g the public<br />
to accept the cards (that is, legal tender); the cards were later redeemed with specie<br />
sent from France. Used repeatedly <strong>in</strong> Quebec, the money became play<strong>in</strong>g tickets rather<br />
than play<strong>in</strong>g cards.<br />
**For an explanation, see Murray N. Rothbard, America's Great Depression, 2d ed.<br />
(Los Angeles: Nash, 1972), pt. 1.<br />
130