22.07.2013 Views

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

None of these actions and restrictions had gone beyond one or two colonies.<br />

The true monopolization of the entire American postal service came <strong>in</strong><br />

1692, when the k<strong>in</strong>g granted a "patent" of monopoly privilege over all the<br />

American colonies for twenty-one years to Thomas Neal, a court favorite<br />

whom he designated as postmaster general. Neal's agent <strong>in</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g the post<br />

was Andrew Hamilton, who also served as governor of East New Jersey and<br />

who persuaded some colonial Assemblies to pass legislation enforc<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

monopoly. Thus, a New York law of 1692 prohibited posts from compet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with Hamilton's, and prescribed postage rates rang<strong>in</strong>g from four and one-half<br />

pence for nearby mail to twenty-four pence to more distant colonies. The<br />

enormous rise <strong>in</strong> postal rates from the days of free competition make clear<br />

how valuable the monopoly privilege was. Most of the colonies followed suit.<br />

The particularly free and <strong>in</strong>dependent colonies of Rhode Island and North<br />

Carol<strong>in</strong>a, on the other hand, passed no enabl<strong>in</strong>g legislation at all.<br />

Despite the enormous rise <strong>in</strong> rates, the postal monopoly suffered net losses,<br />

for the service was slow and <strong>in</strong>efficient—and undoubtedly Hamilton had<br />

priced himself out of the consumer market. But, typical of monopolists, his<br />

only suggested remedy was to raise the rates still further: from six pence to<br />

forty-two pence per letter. The U.S. postmaster general, however, <strong>in</strong>cisively<br />

held that the proposed rates were much too high and that a greater revenue<br />

would be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by lower<strong>in</strong>g rather than rais<strong>in</strong>g the rates, for then "the<br />

easy and cheap correspondency thus encouraged people to write letters." He<br />

also charged that the colonial governments did not grant enough subsidies to<br />

the posts and were <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g on free and special-delivery transmissions of all<br />

governmental letters. On Neal's death the patent of postal privilege fell partly<br />

to his creditor, Hamilton, and after Hamilton's death <strong>in</strong> 1703, the latter's<br />

creditors carried on the work.<br />

In 1707, however, the Crown refused to consider renew<strong>in</strong>g the grant and<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead purchased the privilege back from the owners, for somewhat less than<br />

seventeen hundred pounds. The American postal service became from that<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t on a Crown monopoly. The Crown moved immediately to raise its<br />

postal rates. In the Act of 1711 it established a range of some four pence to<br />

six pence on local mail to one shill<strong>in</strong>g six pence on letters to distant colonies.<br />

The act also appo<strong>in</strong>ted a royal postmaster general for the whole empire, with<br />

a deputy postmaster general stationed <strong>in</strong> New York to run the post for the<br />

English colonies on the American cont<strong>in</strong>ent. The colonies proceeded to evade<br />

the postal monopoly and its charges more than ever before. Officially the bulk<br />

of the colonies accepted the imposition without protest, with the honorable<br />

exception of Virg<strong>in</strong>ia. Virg<strong>in</strong>ia po<strong>in</strong>ted out that the establishment of postal<br />

rates by the Crown <strong>in</strong> effect constituted taxation, and a crucial po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong><br />

Crown-colony relations was always that England could not impose taxation on<br />

the colonies without the consent of their Assemblies. The Virg<strong>in</strong>ia House of<br />

Burgesses therefore refused to grant any money for the post office and also<br />

passed laws crippl<strong>in</strong>g its operation. Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, however, was <strong>in</strong>duced to jo<strong>in</strong><br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!