22.07.2013 Views

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Boston, which could send four. This meant that as the colony grew and new<br />

towns were created, the Assembly became more and more heavily dom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

by the rural towns. Furthermore, each representative had to be a resident of<br />

the particular town. Indeed, the small towns regarded themselves as overrepresented:<br />

the smallest towns were not compelled to send representatives if<br />

they didn't want to, and the next smaller towns were repeatedly try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

extend this cost-sav<strong>in</strong>g privilege to themselves. Thus the cost and trouble of<br />

send<strong>in</strong>g representatives were usually deemed greater than the advantages to be<br />

ga<strong>in</strong>ed. Often towns accepted f<strong>in</strong>es by the lower house rather than to bother<br />

send<strong>in</strong>g representatives. Undoubtedly this lackadaisical attitude reflected the<br />

relative unimportance of government <strong>in</strong> the daily lives of the people.<br />

The land-bank controversy, however, spurred the Massachusetts towns to<br />

send<strong>in</strong>g more of their full complement to the legislature. Alarmed that the<br />

Assembly could use its <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g numbers to overwhelm the Council, Governor<br />

William Shirley vetoed the division of old towns <strong>in</strong>to new, and urged<br />

that <strong>in</strong> the future no new districts have power of representation This restriction<br />

on representation from new population centers was adopted by the British<br />

government and enforced <strong>in</strong> Massachusetts for almost two decades. S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

the lower house already far outnumbered the Council and chose each new<br />

Council annually and jo<strong>in</strong>tly with the old, the Massachusetts Assembly was<br />

therefore already <strong>in</strong> effective control of the Council. The new policy thus<br />

provided an irritant to colonial relations without affect<strong>in</strong>g the basic dom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />

of the Massachusetts lower house.<br />

By the early 1760s the Crown was progressively forced to modify the ban<br />

on representation of new towns. The close of the French and Indian War led<br />

to a rapid population expansion <strong>in</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong>e, and the new Ma<strong>in</strong>e towns clamored<br />

for representation. The Lords of Trade f<strong>in</strong>ally agreed and consented, to<br />

representation from new towns <strong>in</strong> Massachusetts proper, although they still<br />

balked at representation from newly divided towns. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong> 1767, the<br />

Crown gave up completely and abandoned its futile attempt to check the<br />

power of the Assembly by restrict<strong>in</strong>g its representation.<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!