Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the lower house agreed to appropriate twenty thousand pounds for the war,<br />
and to levy an onerous poll tax to raise the money. The House refused to<br />
draft militia for fight<strong>in</strong>g outside Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, but did agree to conscript all<br />
"vagrants" and to force them to fight for Virg<strong>in</strong>ian glory. D<strong>in</strong>widdie had<br />
still not given up the idea of a w<strong>in</strong>ter campaign to recapture Fort Duquesne,<br />
but the lack of <strong>in</strong>terest by the other colonies f<strong>in</strong>ally forced him to abandon<br />
the plan.<br />
Meanwhile, <strong>in</strong> late 1753, the New York government decided to call a jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
conference of the Northern colonies, with the Iroquois and other Indian<br />
tribes, for the follow<strong>in</strong>g June at Albany. As one of many conferences with<br />
the Iroquois and their followers, the idea was to try to mobilize the Indians<br />
for a general assault on French possessions <strong>in</strong> the Ohio Valley. It was the<br />
<strong>in</strong>effable imperialist and warmonger Governor Shirley of Massachusetts<br />
who seized the occasion to try to unite the colonies <strong>in</strong>to a league or confederation.<br />
Only when united under one central government could the full<br />
resources of the American colonies be mobilized by the Crown for an all-out<br />
assault on New France. The old imperialist dream of the Dom<strong>in</strong>ion of New<br />
England was now to be revived and extended to all the British colonies.<br />
The delegates to the Albany Congress were <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> appo<strong>in</strong>ted by the<br />
governors, and largely taken from the councillors of their respective colonies.<br />
The Indian conference was supposed to be the only problem on the<br />
agenda, but under cover of these proceed<strong>in</strong>gs the delegates were persuaded<br />
by Benjam<strong>in</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong>, a delegate from Pennsylvania, to seize the occasion<br />
to propose a central government to rule over all the colonies and thus prosecute<br />
a far broader and more <strong>in</strong>tensified war aga<strong>in</strong>st the French. Frankl<strong>in</strong> did<br />
this even though unauthorized to do so by Pennsylvania. This Plan of Union<br />
—largely Frankl<strong>in</strong>'s—as approved by the delegates <strong>in</strong> July, urged the British<br />
Parliament to impose over all the colonies a central supergovernment, whose<br />
executive would be appo<strong>in</strong>ted by the Crown and whose legislature would<br />
consist of a grand council chosen by the respective colonial Assemblies.<br />
Executive salaries were to be provided by the Crown, thus bypass<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
salary troubles that the royal governors had all had with the colonial Assemblies,<br />
and thus free<strong>in</strong>g the executive power from the checks and limits<br />
imposed on it by the representatives of the American public. Of particular<br />
significance was the tax<strong>in</strong>g power, to be given to the president and the<br />
Council, and to be appropriated for the functions of the general government.<br />
The Albany Plan, however, was a total dud. The <strong>in</strong>dependent and libertylov<strong>in</strong>g<br />
colonists had had enough trouble with royal prerogative embodied <strong>in</strong><br />
the executive and judicial powers of the <strong>in</strong>dividual colonies. They had no<br />
desire for another supergovernment to add still another and greater eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />
of oppression. Rhode Island and Connecticut, now happily free of all royal<br />
officials, were especially vehement <strong>in</strong> opposition. The Connecticut delegates<br />
refused to sign the plan and the Connecticut Assembly attacked it<br />
233