22.07.2013 Views

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

uncollectible quitrents. The upshot was that the Quakers had agreed to a large<br />

war budget without even ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of tax<strong>in</strong>g the proprietary<br />

itself. Hear<strong>in</strong>g also that hundreds of violent Scots frontiersmen were march<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on Philadelphia, the Assembly <strong>in</strong>creased its own appropriation by 5,000<br />

pounds.<br />

The Quaker Assembly not only assented sup<strong>in</strong>ely to a huge military program,<br />

but also was <strong>in</strong>duced to agree for the first time to an official governmental<br />

militia for Pennsylvania. The militia bill was <strong>in</strong>troduced by Frankl<strong>in</strong><br />

at the end of 1755. Frankl<strong>in</strong> won Quaker support by proclaim<strong>in</strong>g the voluntarism<br />

of the militia; no one, Quaker or non-Quaker, was to be conscripted<br />

<strong>in</strong>to its service who might be "conscientiously scrupulous." Furthermore, the<br />

volunteer soldiers could democratically choose their own officers. The Quakers,<br />

however, seemed to have forgotten that their pr<strong>in</strong>ciple was to oppose any governmental<br />

militia, any coercive body imposed by the state. So shrewdly did<br />

Frankl<strong>in</strong> maneuver that this unprecedented bill passed the Assembly <strong>in</strong> two<br />

days with only four pacifist Quakers <strong>in</strong> opposition—aga<strong>in</strong> led by the courageous<br />

James Pemberton.<br />

Thus, <strong>in</strong> less than a year's time, Benjam<strong>in</strong> Frankl<strong>in</strong> had succeeded <strong>in</strong> radically<br />

transform<strong>in</strong>g the politics and policies of the Quaker party and of the<br />

Assembly. He had managed to work himself <strong>in</strong>to the party leadership on a<br />

program of war expenditures and a militia, by lead<strong>in</strong>g the Assembly <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

political struggle with the proprietary and its appo<strong>in</strong>ted executive.* The pure<br />

Quakers, devoted to the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of peace and <strong>in</strong>dividualism, had been isolated<br />

and routed. The Pembertons organized a petition urg<strong>in</strong>g that Quakers<br />

"suffer" rather than pay war taxes, but this scarcely succeeded <strong>in</strong> turn<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

tide.<br />

In the meanwhile, the proprietary party was pursu<strong>in</strong>g an old dream of the<br />

younger Penns: the barr<strong>in</strong>g of the Quakers and their supporters from the<br />

Assembly <strong>in</strong> Pennsylvania. The new campaign to ga<strong>in</strong> parliamentary legislation<br />

to this effect was launched <strong>in</strong> London <strong>in</strong> early 1755 by the Reverend<br />

William Smith, who urged a Test Oath for will<strong>in</strong>gness to fight, as well as a<br />

disenfranchisement for all Germans until "they have a sufficient knowledge of<br />

our language and constitution." He also proposed the outlaw<strong>in</strong>g of all newspapers<br />

or journals pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> any foreign language. In the fall a petition for<br />

barr<strong>in</strong>g Quakers from the Assembly was circulated <strong>in</strong> Pennsylvania, led by<br />

William Allen. Alarmed, the English Quakers, a group prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong> English<br />

affairs, counterattacked with susta<strong>in</strong>ed pressure. In hear<strong>in</strong>gs before the Board<br />

of Trade, the successful war-supply and militia bills were used as evidence<br />

that the Quakers were no longer pacifist, and therefore, no longer a source of<br />

worry. The board and the Privy Council, however, disallowed the Pennsylvania<br />

militia bill <strong>in</strong> the summer of 1756, because it dared to allow exemptions<br />

to conscientious objectors.<br />

*See ibid., p. 307.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!