22.07.2013 Views

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Conceived in Liberty Volume 2 - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

17<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Tobacco<br />

The tobacco planters of Virg<strong>in</strong>ia cont<strong>in</strong>ued, <strong>in</strong> the eighteenth century, to<br />

get <strong>in</strong>to periods of economic difficulty, and the secular trend was om<strong>in</strong>ous.<br />

The price that planters had to pay for slaves rose with the <strong>in</strong>creased demand<br />

for slaves on South Carol<strong>in</strong>a rice and <strong>in</strong>digo plantations. Thus, the common<br />

price of slaves rose from thirty pounds per head <strong>in</strong> 1741 to forty-six pounds<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1750 to fifty-eight pounds <strong>in</strong> the 1770s. Soil exhaustion also lowered the<br />

productivity of the tobacco plantations.<br />

The tobacco planters cont<strong>in</strong>ued to try to escape their dw<strong>in</strong>dl<strong>in</strong>g fortunes on<br />

the market by seek<strong>in</strong>g special privilege. A favorite device was a compulsory<br />

cartel, imposed by the state, to restrict tobacco production. Production quotas<br />

were then imposed on each plantation. But these restrictions did not have the<br />

desired effect of rais<strong>in</strong>g the price of a commodity that was grown on an <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

market; and curtailment <strong>in</strong> one area provided a lively <strong>in</strong>ducement for<br />

other farmers to fill the gap by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g their output. Moreover, the cartel's<br />

schemes worked the greatest hardship on the small planter; tobacco was the<br />

major monetary medium <strong>in</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong>ia and Maryland and the small planter was<br />

forced to pay fixed sums—<strong>in</strong> tobacco—for governmental fees, taxes, and quitrents.<br />

Hence, forced restriction on the amount of tobacco grown was a great<br />

.hardship on the small planter, whose fixed fees loomed larger <strong>in</strong> proportion<br />

to his total output. Thus, a Virg<strong>in</strong>ia-Maryland tobacco cartel scheme <strong>in</strong> the<br />

late 1720s fell through because the small farmers of Maryland would not<br />

comply unless Lord Baltimore reduced the quantity of tobacco levied for quitrents.<br />

When Lord Baltimore refused to agree, the scheme had to be abandoned.<br />

The Virg<strong>in</strong>ia planters also tried to escape their difficulties by exploit<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!